Talk:Peaks Island: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by 64.134.136.132 - "" |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
== Golf Cart Taxi Incident == |
== Golf Cart Taxi Incident == |
||
This is trivial content. The entire section should be removed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.134.136.132|64.134.136.132]] ([[User talk:64.134.136.132|talk]]) 01:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
This is trivial content. The entire section should be removed. |
Revision as of 01:02, 8 June 2014
Maine Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
The Wreck of the Hesperus
Removing this section:
- Portland native Henry Wadsworth Longfellow was inspired to write one of his most famous poems The Wreck of the Hesperus after seeing the wreck of the schooner Helen Eliza, which sank off the island's southeast side in 1869 where "the cruel rocks...gored" her.
Many, many sites/events have been attributed as Longfellow's inspiration. Such as Folklore: When/what was the wreck of the Hesperus' Econrad 14:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Island Secession Debate
I've added a reference to the debate about Peaks breaking off from Portland. I'm not entirely sure where that's going, but I figured that I would add it. If somebody else has any more recent information about the succession debate, please post.
Thanks... --Alphachimp 05:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- The secession isn't going to happen. I remeber they were discussing a secession back when Long Island seceeded in 1993, but then Portland stepped up and gave Peaks more services. Mostly because Portland can't afford to lose the tax dollars the residents of Peaks provides. If the debate gets to a point where a movement just might happen, I'm sure Portland will launch a counter-defensive. Almost Famous 07:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think it might happen. I guess the island residents voted to secede. It's now in the hands of the legislature. I noted it in the article, btw. Alphachimp talk 05:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- I added an update to the secession discussion, current as of Oct. 14, 2007.TomBohan 19:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- I discovered that my Oct 2007 text regarding the secession movement had been substantially distorted, with an element of emotionalism introduced, in Nov 2007. I have now brought the text back to what it was and have also updated the subject through Jan. 2009.TomBohan (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Tom, I revised the politics section to be much shorter and found citations for nearly every revised sentence that I wrote. Given the Peaks Island page is after all an encyclopedia entry, I thought it would be better to keep things tight and excise discussion about the secession pro/anti points of view, and of PIC member composition. The cited references can shed enough background on both of those items, I think.
- Side note: In my opinion, the section should be revised to add text about the 1991-1995 secession movement, about which there is zero online; I'll have to find something in the PPH archives. A research project... there may also be earlier instances of Peaks/Portland political wrangling that I haven't heard of yet.Jubal Kessler (talk) 23:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
History Request
The article could use a formal, cited walkthrough of Peaks history, starting from settlement in the late 1600s to present day, which can also help set the context for a more complete "Demographics" section. The collection of trivia about John Ford and the Gem Theater is not really a complete picture of the island, which is why I put that under "Notable Items" instead of a section called "History".Jubal Kessler (talk) 23:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. It has been four years since the suggestion, and nobody has stepped up to do it. So somebody in Portland with access to the Portland historical society should spend an afternoon putting together this history, with citations to appropriate books and articles.ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 16:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Taxi
Welcome to a new editor. An interesting quirky island sort of thing, this taxi incident. I reformatted the footnotes for the first two paragraphs, as per Wikipedia style. The text of the third paragraph though, appeared not to be supported by the cited sources. "Many said" and "others thought" was not in the articles cited. Also to be candid, three paragraphs is more space than this incident may deserve. Still, I will tread carefully with this new editor and limit myself to a reversion just to get attention directed to this talk page. My congratulations on an interesting addition to Wikipedia.ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 20:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Golf Cart Taxi Incident
This is trivial content. The entire section should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.136.132 (talk) 01:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)