Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gus Sorola (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Clarityfiend (talk | contribs) Creating deletion discussion page for Gus Sorola. (TW) |
Delete |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Gus Sorola}}) |
:({{Find sources|Gus Sorola}}) |
||
Being a computer technician and voice actor is not enough, not by a far stretch. Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NACTOR]]. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 10:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
Being a computer technician and voice actor is not enough, not by a far stretch. Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NACTOR]]. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 10:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. I cannot find "significant coverage in multiple published[3] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[4] and independent of the subject...", which is required to meet the basic standard of notability under [[WP:BASIC]]. Neither is there any evidence of a) significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; b) a large fan base or a significant "cult" following or c) unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment, which are required to establish notability under [[WP:NACTOR]]. I therefore support the nomination on the basis of lack of notability, as destined in WP policy. [[User:Wikipeterproject|Wikipeterproject]] ([[User talk:Wikipeterproject|talk]]) 14:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:22, 10 June 2014
AfDs for this article:
- Gus Sorola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Being a computer technician and voice actor is not enough, not by a far stretch. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I cannot find "significant coverage in multiple published[3] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[4] and independent of the subject...", which is required to meet the basic standard of notability under WP:BASIC. Neither is there any evidence of a) significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; b) a large fan base or a significant "cult" following or c) unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment, which are required to establish notability under WP:NACTOR. I therefore support the nomination on the basis of lack of notability, as destined in WP policy. Wikipeterproject (talk) 14:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)