User talk:Vanjagenije

Main	Articles	Files	Userboxes	Awards	Tools	News	Deletion log	Talk page

In an emergency, this user may be slapped with a trout.

Proposed deletion of Patanjali (Patu) G Keswani

Hi,

I have fixed all issues highlighted. Please review my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patu_Keswani again.

Hi! You did not fix all the issues. All articles (especially WP:BLP) should have WP:Inline citations in order to establish WP:Verifability. Your article has only one inline citation. Other sources are also not properly formatted. See here how to format sources: WP:Citing sources. Other issue is that the article is nearly WP:Orphan. There is only one other article that links to it (see here: [1]). You should try to WP:DE-ORPHAN the article. Feel free to ask me for help. And please, sign your posts (see here: WP:SIGN). Vanjagenije (talk) 10:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I have fixed issues. Please review and let me know if any other issues left.

Thanks

Actually, you did not fix all issues. You inserted inline citations, but they are all WP:Bare URLs, they are not in the proper style (see: WP:Citing sources). One of your citations points to another Wikipedia article, which is contrary to the WP:Circular policy. The article is getting better, but you have to work on the proper style of citation. And, please, SIGN YOUR POSTS (see here how to do it: WP:SIGN). Vanjagenije (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I have fixed issues stated in earlier post. Please review it once again. Vivekkhanna123456 04:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Vanjagenije (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

New articles being marked for deletion

Hi! Thanks for your efforts with the New Page patrol. I notice that you recently proposed the Scalliwag article for deletion when it was only twelve minutes old. Although a cursory internet search does tend to suggest that the song is not notable, I am concerned that such a rapid PROD can only discourage editors. May I therefore suggest that you patrol new pages from the back of the queue as suggested here? This would allow editors time to establish any notability from offline sources. Longwayround (talk) 17:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Pan-nationalist concepts

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Pan-nationalist concepts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Olla Podrida

I don't really care one way or the other. I just found this old brochure and thought somebody would be interested, as other malls (past and present) seem to have pages. If somebody wants to write an article based upon the brochure, be my guest. By the same token, if it does not qualify, they can also delete it. Elpablo69 (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi! The problem with the article was the WP:Notability. Yes, some malls have Wikipedia articles, but not all of them. Only those notable enough have articles. Notability is generally established by citing reliable sources (see: WP:42). Your article did not cite any source, nor did it explain why the said mall would be notable. Another problem is that you filled the article with images scanned from the brochure. That is a copyright violation, since you are not the author of the brochure, and since you do not have author's permission to publish those images (see: WP:COPYRIGHT). Vanjagenije (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

My plan was not to write a detailed article, but provide source material for other editors. However if it is not within the guidelines, I take no offense to deletion. Interesting that WP would consider something to be copyright when there is no copyright notice anywhere, and the publisher is out of business. Gotta love lawyers, huh? Elpablo69 (talk) 04:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

According to the laws of almost all countries that ratified the Berne Convention (including the United States), copyrights do not depend on any kind of copyright notice. Every work is copyrighted per se, the same moment it is created, with or without notice. The copyright belongs to the author of the work, and copyright is valid even after the death of the author (70 years after his death in most countries). And, yes, copyrights are very important for Wikipedia, and any kind of copyright violation is quickly removed. You can learn more about copyrights on Wikipedia here: WP:COPYRIGHT. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Miss Multiverse page deleted

Greetings, you have a very nice wikipedia page and profile... congrats!!!

I have a frustrating issue here... I have created the page Miss Multiverse, it was deleted once before about a year ago, i don´t understand why if it has all the right references, no use of promotion, just facts, there are even winners of miss universe that have participated in Miss Multiverse whom have profiles on wikipedia... and its still deleted as if this beauty pageant does not exist.

There are many smaller beauty pageants listed on wikipedia, we are just not able to comprehend why this is happening, it almost feels as if enthusiasts or supporters of other pageants are deleting this one, it takes time to learn how to use wikipedia and frustrating to see someone just come and delete it.

I will appreciate your help enormously, if you would kindly take a look and figure out a solution.

Best regards,

Jose Cuello (talk) 14:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Your article (Miss Multiverse) was deleted on 13 September 2013 following an wp:articles for deletion discussion. The discussion is kept here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Multiverse. The main reason the article was deleted is the lack of wp:Notability. One of the main rules of Wikipedia is that only subjects that are notable enough may have Wikipedia articles. The notability of the subject is proved by citing multiple reliable sources that significantly cover the subject (see: WP:42). That is the only way to prove notability. It is not important whether the pageant is big or small, and who participated, but whether there are reliable independent sources that significantly cover the subject. Your article currently does cite some sources, but I can't see what the situation was in September 2013. That version probably did not cite sources, or the sources were not reliable. Again, I can't see how the article looked liked before it was deleted, so I can't be sure. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

As far as I see, the article is safe now, as the speedy deletion proposal was contested, and the administrator did not speedy delete. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations

You mass use speedy deletion templates in articles by User:Appletreer. But, user Appletreer is not blocked and also articles (like as Aeroport_(Metrovalencia) etc) do not meet any requirements for speedy deletion (articles meet the standards, so). Please reverted your edits, if you want delete these articles, please use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, I know, he is not blocked (yet). Blocked users cannot create articles, so it is clear that he is not blocked. But, he is an obvious sockpuppet of User:Pumpie who is blocked indefinitely. A sockpuppet investigation is open (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pumpie) and he will be blocked very soon. I am aware that I should wait for the investigation to be closed before invoking G5, but this is a very well known sockmaster, with dozens of proven socks. His behavior is easily recognized, so I tagged those articles in advance. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

If user vandalises pages - ok, quickly reverts but this user not vandalises pages. There is no justification to use "speedy delete" templates before end of sockpuppet case. Also, G5 say: "... and which have no substantial edits by others". Part of these articles have been corrected by others. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 22:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Porto Campanhã railway station

Hello Vanjagenije. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Porto Campanhã railway station, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not created by a banned user, or the page does not violate the user's ban. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Corroios railway station

Hello Vanjagenije. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Corroios railway station, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not created by a banned user, or the page does not violate the user's ban. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Plaza Venezuela (Caracas Metro)

Hello Vanjagenije. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Plaza Venezuela (Caracas Metro), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not created by a banned user, or the page does not violate the user's ban. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Valencia Nord railway station

How about, you will remove the PROD tag and we will redirect the article to Estació del Nord, Valencia? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

As I can see, that is already done. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Protecting African Lions

Dear Vanjagenije

Protecting African Lions PAL is a high profile charitable organisation with multiple celebrities involved including Conor Mccreedy and Rohan Marley, son of Bob Marley.

This organisation is not different to:

1. Save the rhino - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Save_the_Rhino 2. Save the Elephant - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Save_the_Elephants 3. Project Elephant - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Elephant 4. etc 5. etc

The list goes on of similar projects that all have wikipedia pages, why is PAL not in the same category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael J Palmer (talk • contribs) 11:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi! The whole problem with your article is WP:Notability. In Wikipedia, only notable subjects may have articles. Notability is proven by citing reliable independent sources that significantly cover the subject (see: WP:42). At the moment when I tagged the article for speedy deletion ([2]), it did not cite any sources, nor did the article explain why the subject is notable (it did not contain so-called WP:Credible claim of significance). Other articles you mention (Save the Rhino, Save the Elephants, Project Elephant) all cite reliable sources, and that is the difference. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Gann Church article improvement

Hello Vanjagenije, regarding the Gann Church article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gann_Church) I made a first start, but there is indeed little information available on the internet about the church. I do have a photo of the church made on my holiday trip and the information I put in the article about the church is from an information-sign nearby the church. So I want to update the article at least with a photo of the church.

Hi, Tjeerdnet! First of all, you should sign every post you write on a talk page (see here: WP:SIGN). You are welcome to add a photo to the article, if you are the author of the photo. You should upload your photo to the Wikimedia Commons. Commons is Wikipedia's sister project made for uploading free files (like images, videos and so). You can upload the photo using Commons' upload wizard (here). When you upload the photo, you can easily include it into the article. You can read here how to insert a photo into the article: Help:Files. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk back 2014 Kuala Lumpur

Hi! Well, Del Potro, Raonic and Nishikori are the only confirmed players to play in the tournament (the defending champion Sousa could also be there but there's no reliable source to use), and since they are the only ones, they have to be seeds at the moment. But no, there's really no source on seeds three months before the tournament. JoseRodil25 (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

So, as there are no sources, that information has to be removed. Wikipedia only accepts verifiable information (see: WP:Verifability). By the way, tournament seeds are always announced few days before the tournament, so there is no way to know seeds for a tournament three months in advance. Those three players are the only confirmed players as of today, but there will be much more players, and we cannot know how they are going to be seeded. WP:Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Wikipedia only accepts verifiable, sourced information. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Timlin

Hi Vanja, I am a drama undergraduate at Flinders University Adelaide and my current research is in the area of Australian New Wave drama from the late 60s into the early 80s. I apologize for my clumsy first efforts on this page and have since polished up the page. Let me know if it of a more acceptable standard. I'd like to also make you aware that as my current paper is on the Australian Performing Group which was responsible for a tremendous shift in Australia's theatre and thus influenced our nation's future culture and psyche that I'll be expanding on the pages Australian Performing Group, La Mama Theatre (Melbourne), The Pram Factory, Jack Hibberd, Kerry Dwyer, John Romeril, Graeme Blundell, Alex Buzo, Kris Hemensley, Barry Oakley, Bill Garner, Bruce Spence and their collective works. I'll continue to read wiki entry tutorials and endeavour to strngthen my encyclopedic style. Thank you for your moderation.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/la-mama-founder-betty-burstall-dies-20130617-2odza.html#ixzz34zW3C5iP