Talk:Lost Luggage (video game): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)/GA1}} |
{{Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)/GA1}} |
||
{{Did you know nominations/Lost Luggage (video game)}} |
Revision as of 13:04, 24 June 2014
Lost Luggage (video game) is currently a Video games good article nominee. Nominated by Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits at 01:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I love that there was no room on the cartridge for a luggage train! Skycap is unfamiliar. Even though there's a wikilink, would it be appropriate to say "skycap porter" or something? Otherwise, everything reads beautifully, there's nothing that needs tweaking. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Went with skycap porter. Thanks for looking over the article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 16:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
We're now at 55 GAs in the 1980s video games category! I have to say, this was one of the cleanest, GA-ready articles I've had the pleasure of reviewing. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Im not sure quite what to say. Is this being a featured artivle intended as some kind of joke? Whilst well written and technically acceptable it is, to put mildly, not of much interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.120.173 (talk) 20:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well they can't all be winners. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Featured articles are chosen purely for how well they cover their topic, not for how interesting the topic is. It is a bit weird to see such random stuff featured though. --74.128.224.174 (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)