User talk:FWOak: Difference between revisions
m customize |
→June 2014: Requested reconsideration of deleted content based on adherence to Wikipedia's Policies |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
See also [[WP:COI]] in case it might apply. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 22:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC) |
See also [[WP:COI]] in case it might apply. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 22:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
Hi Ronz - I am contributor, FWOak and am asking that you reconsider your decision to delete my contributions to the AAT Page. |
|||
Sections removed included: |
|||
* Title: "Groups Supporting AAT" |
|||
* Subtitle: “Pet Partners® Therapy Animal Program Affiliates & Community Partners |
|||
* Sentence: A Pet Partners Affiliate is a Pet Partners group that helps train, evaluate as well as support our therapy animal teams in a local area. |
|||
* Picture: puppy in training |
|||
* External links (cited sources): Pet Partners & Delta Hearts of Gold |
|||
I felt that the additions I made did not change the meaning of an article - animal assisted therapy. The parent organization, Pet Partners link was also removed- a national group you originally shared in your article (Delta Society). I find it confusing that this link, part of the history of AAT was removed as “soapboxing” or advertising, even-though you allowed in your initial text. |
|||
Also of interest is the removal of a “dog with vest, being socialized” - How was that a COI? How is this “soapboxing?” or advertising? His vest says, “Pet me, I am friendly.” Our club has brown vests, not the green showcased (no logo also appeared on the dog or picture). |
|||
As for purpose in my additions: I have found that many, many individuals we visit with want to know more about HOW to become involved and WHERE to go for information. If you find that I have a COI, could you list some places where AAT is offered? Maybe several organizations – including the Parent Organization? |
|||
I hope you find the small added information helpful to the article and add the sections back as they adhere to the Policy Requirement set forth by Wikipedia. In essence: my additions supported ATT major points of view, giving due weight with respect to their prominence in an impartial tone. |
|||
I look forward to your response. |
|||
Respectfully, |
|||
FWOak |
|||
Revision as of 03:40, 27 June 2014
June 2014
Hello, I'm Ronz. I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions were reverted because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 22:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ronz - I am contributor, FWOak and am asking that you reconsider your decision to delete my contributions to the AAT Page.
Sections removed included:
- Title: "Groups Supporting AAT"
- Subtitle: “Pet Partners® Therapy Animal Program Affiliates & Community Partners
- Sentence: A Pet Partners Affiliate is a Pet Partners group that helps train, evaluate as well as support our therapy animal teams in a local area.
- Picture: puppy in training
- External links (cited sources): Pet Partners & Delta Hearts of Gold
I felt that the additions I made did not change the meaning of an article - animal assisted therapy. The parent organization, Pet Partners link was also removed- a national group you originally shared in your article (Delta Society). I find it confusing that this link, part of the history of AAT was removed as “soapboxing” or advertising, even-though you allowed in your initial text.
Also of interest is the removal of a “dog with vest, being socialized” - How was that a COI? How is this “soapboxing?” or advertising? His vest says, “Pet me, I am friendly.” Our club has brown vests, not the green showcased (no logo also appeared on the dog or picture).
As for purpose in my additions: I have found that many, many individuals we visit with want to know more about HOW to become involved and WHERE to go for information. If you find that I have a COI, could you list some places where AAT is offered? Maybe several organizations – including the Parent Organization?
I hope you find the small added information helpful to the article and add the sections back as they adhere to the Policy Requirement set forth by Wikipedia. In essence: my additions supported ATT major points of view, giving due weight with respect to their prominence in an impartial tone.
I look forward to your response.
Respectfully, FWOak