Talk:Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song): Difference between revisions
m This article wasn't promoted to GA status today, it was in 2010. I saw the name of the article also today on WP:GA. |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header|search=yes}} |
{{talk header|search=yes}} |
||
{{GAR/link|07:41, 29 June 2014 (UTC)|page=2|GARpage=3|status= }} |
|||
{{ArticleHistory |
{{ArticleHistory |
||
|action1=GAN |
|action1=GAN |
Revision as of 07:41, 29 June 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
The good article status of this article is being reassessed by an individual editor to determine if the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page, but the decision to list the article as a good article should be left to the editor initiating this reassessment. Date: 07:41, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) is part of the The Fame series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
New Certification
Paparazzi was certified Gold in Germany. Source: http://www.musikindustrie.de/gold_platin_datenbank/ Type "Lady GaGa Paparazzi" in to the box, and it shows up. --It's Flo (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Chord progression is incorrect
EDIT: The chord progression is now totally bizarre. Fix please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.131.132.156 (talk) 03:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
The chord progression currently in the article (Ab–Cm–Fm–Db–Ab–Cm–Fm–Db–Db) is both incomplete (it doesn't include the verse), and incorrect. As written, it most resembles the chord progression of the chorus, which is actually a progression of 4 chords that repeats 4x. The actual 4 chords in the chorus are:
Ab-Eb-Fm-Db
This relative progression qualifies as the "Sensitive Female Chord Progression", following vi-IV-I-V, but offset by two chords: I-V-vi-IV. See http://www.boston.com/ae/music/articles/2008/12/31/striking_a_chord/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitive_Female_Chord_Progression.
Chorus lyrics with the chord changes at their proper positions:
Ab Eb Fm Db I'm your biggest fan I'll follow you until you love me, Papa-paparazzi Ab Eb Fm Db Baby there's no other superstar you know that i'll be your Papa-paparazzi. Ab Eb Fm Db Promise i'll be kind, but i won't stop until that boy is mine. Ab Eb Fm Db Baby you'll be famous chase you down until you love me, Papa-paparazzi
The verse chord progression is as follows:
Verse1: Cm - Ab - Cm
Cm We are the crowd, we're c-coming out. Got my flash on it's true, need that picture of you Ab Cm It's so magical, We'd be so fantastical
Verse2:
Cm - Ab - Fm
Cm Leather and jeans, garage glamorous, Not sure what it means, but this photo of us Ab Fm It don't have a price, ready for those flashing lights, 'Cause you know that baby I...
The entire bridge is in the song key of Cm, so there is technically no progression, just that one chord.
--Novox77 (talk) 04:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks but source used states otherwise. Wikipedia goes for verifiabililty, rather than the truth. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would have hoped that a nudge to the truth would have triggered some more research on the veracity of the original source, which is clearly incorrect. Here I present three independent sources which corroborate the truth. I'm not sure what kind of source qualifies as a verifiable source, but here they are nevertheless.
- Thanks but source used states otherwise. Wikipedia goes for verifiabililty, rather than the truth. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would also hope that wikipedia ultimately wants to present truth, and that the condition of that truth is that it can be verified. As you described it, it sounded like wiki's position was to accept any verifiable source, regardless of its correctness. Novox77 (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed you are right my friend. As long as an extremely reliable source reports it, WP will add it even if it says that Jesus was born in Phillipines. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would also hope that wikipedia ultimately wants to present truth, and that the condition of that truth is that it can be verified. As you described it, it sounded like wiki's position was to accept any verifiable source, regardless of its correctness. Novox77 (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Edit Semi-Protected
{{editsemiprotected}} In the release history section:
Add that it was released in Germany on September 11, 2009 Source 1 Source 2
Add that it was released in France on Decmeber 7, 2009 Source 1 Source 2
TSWABH (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- It was already Done. --Mikemoral♪♫ 01:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Repetition
In the Music Video section, both the last and second to last paragraphs mention that "Telephone" picks up where "Paparazzi" left off. Different wording, but both making the exact same point. I'd suggest removing the first instance (and would have done myself, if there weren't references attached to both instances). JaffaCakeLover (talk) 11:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wizard of Oz dress?
She performed this song in a The Wizard of Oz dress? Where is the reference for this? I thought it was more a Thierry Mugler-esque origami dress. :S Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Chord Progression... Again
What the... Hell is this:
"Cm–A♭–C–N–C"
Since when do we have an "N-chord", or even a note? Please, someone fix this, this is absolutely ridiculous and incorrect, shouldn't take place at Wikipedia, let alone in the case of such a major song/artist/article. Thanks. My.life.is.muzik... (talk) 13:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Paparazzi+The+Remixes+Part+Deux+-+Lady+GaGa.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Paparazzi+The+Remixes+Part+Deux+-+Lady+GaGa.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
File:PaparazziRemixes1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:PaparazziRemixes1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
Paparazzi No.1 on Billboard Radio Songs
Paparazzi was lady GaGa first song on the top of Billboard Radio Songs i think it was in late 2009,but if you don't believe me,go look at official billboard radio songs chart in 2009 and see,Please change that on charts section,Thank's :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.178.214.82 (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Please refer to WP:USCHARTS. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Good article reassessment nominees
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics The Fame good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class Lady Gaga articles
- Mid-importance Lady Gaga articles
- WikiProject Lady Gaga articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class electronic music articles
- Mid-importance electronic music articles
- WikiProject Electronic music articles