Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repurposing: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*'''Keep'''. I found another reference to cite, lets find some more! --[[User:Highway 231|Highway 231]] ([[User talk:Highway 231|talk]]) 13:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. I found another reference to cite, lets find some more! --[[User:Highway 231|Highway 231]] ([[User talk:Highway 231|talk]]) 13:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
**Some more references have been '''ADDED'''. |
**Some more references have been '''ADDED'''. --[[Special:Contributions/74.162.159.239|74.162.159.239]] ([[User talk:74.162.159.239|talk]]) 21:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:18, 9 July 2014
- Repurposing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like plain, nearly unsourced Original research. No indication of notabilty The Banner talk 18:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, because environmentalists could use these examples! --Highway 231 (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a guide book or collection of idea's. The Banner talk 21:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I will find reference links to secure the notability of this page. I've found lots of examples, so now what I gotta do is find some more reference links to this! --Highway 231 (talk) 00:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a guide book or collection of idea's. The Banner talk 21:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. As stated, this appears to be entirely composed of original research, and as pointed out, Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 22:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Reuse#Repurposing, where it is already mentioned. I agree that this article has a lot of well-intentioned yet unsourced original research into repurposing in the environmental/conservation field. There are also many different kinds of repurposing, Repurposing (broadcasting) and Drug repositioning, for instance. Google searches show evidence of use of this term in the environmental field, but I cannot say I've found solid secondary surveys of the practice needed for notability. It is a verifiable term and a plausible search term, so a redirect to Reuse#Repurposing seems warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 23:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I found another reference to cite, lets find some more! --Highway 231 (talk) 13:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Some more references have been ADDED. --74.162.159.239 (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)