Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 April 23: Difference between revisions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deleting a message that was sent to me |
m T13bot task 1 using AWB |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude><div class="boilerplate |
<noinclude><div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 1px 0 0; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; font-size:10px"> |
||
{| width = "100%" |
{| width = "100%" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Revision as of 15:23, 11 July 2014
April 23
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![02:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_April_23#c-AnomieBOT-2012-04-23T02:02:00.000Z-File:Screenshot_of_the_members_from_their_recent_effort_"BABY_I'M_SORRY".png){kind=link}
- File:Screenshot of the members from their recent effort "BABY I'M SORRY".png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Screen capture from a music video. Chikazuku (talk) 01:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:James Dudley Fooshe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No original source. Says was "original photo before 1936" and is listed as PD-US which applies to photos made prior to 1923. With unknown date of publishing and unknown source, unable to assess appropriate copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This photo of James dudley Fooshe was taken in 1918 at Augusta, richmond Co., Georgia. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamuelTGeer (talk • contribs) 15:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- When and where was it published? -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Christopher-Showerman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Seems to be a screenshot from a film. Dubious own work. Similar (and older) photo here. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jason whitehorn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image has a tag on the image that says "_____ photography (sorry, I cannot read it) 2002" As the image doesn't source that group or person, I cannot believe the validity of the copyright tag. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image source User:Peterchasefx but this article Says it was taken by Eric Edmeads. Unknown original source. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mafiia.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is a logo. probably not free. May be covered under PD-Text, but font is unique. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mir Tanha Yousafi Treh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Images are scans of the covers of books. As such they are most likely copyright. If they are, there is no FUR and they would not pass WP:NFCC#8 since they are used in the article about the author, not about the book. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MNYL - Office Networks.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphaned image looks to be a map for Max New York Life Insurance that was taken from a website (see the bottom left: Click on the Marked States to Find Max New York Life Addresses) Probably not free. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Road-97-Tabyad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploaded as http://www.panoramio.com/photo/13539995 long before it was uploaded on Wikipedia. MGA73 (talk) 18:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm doubting the validity of this image as a whole representing the band as the background image is from here. The copyright of this image is unknown. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eurofighter and crest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The crest is most likely copyrighted, and the photo may not be the uploader's own work. Cloudbound (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The crest is most likely copyrighted, and the photo may not be the uploader's own work. Cloudbound (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Modular origami.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of origami, possibly in Japan. Could the photographed things be seen as artworks and thus be potential FOP issues? Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I took this photograph in Moscow, Russia. Denghu (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Freedom of panorama is also an issue in Russia. See Commons:COM:FOP#Russia. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I took this photograph in Moscow, Russia. Denghu (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.