Talk:IXS Enterprise: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Capilleary (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Can a picture be added to this? It would really help conceptualize this craft to readers. The only reason I can think of a picture not having been added already is because of licensing for the official images. Is this true? If so, let's figure out a fair-use solution. [[User:Astrobotanical|Astrobotanical]] ([[User talk:Astrobotanical|talk]]) 23:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC) |
Can a picture be added to this? It would really help conceptualize this craft to readers. The only reason I can think of a picture not having been added already is because of licensing for the official images. Is this true? If so, let's figure out a fair-use solution. [[User:Astrobotanical|Astrobotanical]] ([[User talk:Astrobotanical|talk]]) 23:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
-- |
|||
Mark Rademaker has allowed the use of his images on this article if it remains open. Quote: |
|||
''I believe that wiki page is subject to deletion, and with good reason. :) |
|||
You have my permission if it remains open.'' |
|||
[[User:Capilleary|Capilleary]] ([[User talk:Capilleary|talk]]) 12:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:40, 13 July 2014
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is both not noteable and dumb. I propose that this page be removed.
--
Scientists and artists have worked on this concept. It is the result of hundreds of hours of work, that could be the first baby step to the future of civilization. Some day, this page will serve as a historical account of how things started to take shape. Of course, if anyone has any way of showing that this is indeed not notable and dumb, arguments will always be considered. Capilleary (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
--
You did not even propose a reason for it being "not noteable" and "dumb." Either provide an actual, helpful insight or you will not be taken seriously. Copulative (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
--
Do you mind at least providing a reason for your statements about the article? I'm open to any valid arguments. Thank you. Sabhansali (talk) 06:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
--
why on earth or indeed the universe should this be deleted? - it is neither inaccurate - nor is it not notable and nor is it dumb - please enlighten us with the reasons why you think this is so?
--
Can a picture be added to this? It would really help conceptualize this craft to readers. The only reason I can think of a picture not having been added already is because of licensing for the official images. Is this true? If so, let's figure out a fair-use solution. Astrobotanical (talk) 23:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
--
Mark Rademaker has allowed the use of his images on this article if it remains open. Quote: I believe that wiki page is subject to deletion, and with good reason. :) You have my permission if it remains open. Capilleary (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)