Jump to content

Talk:Fedora Linux/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+
r
Line 10: Line 10:


:First up, this article is really short. It is around a sixth of the size of the Debian and Ubuntu articles, which suggests that there is a lot of detail not present here. There is no section on hardware requirements or the development process, and details about kernels and packages are left out. The GAC don't require it to be too long, but without significantly more detail I wouldn't pass it. Sorry. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 22:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
:First up, this article is really short. It is around a sixth of the size of the Debian and Ubuntu articles, which suggests that there is a lot of detail not present here. There is no section on hardware requirements or the development process, and details about kernels and packages are left out. The GAC don't require it to be too long, but without significantly more detail I wouldn't pass it. Sorry. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 22:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Since there was no response, I'm failing it this time, but if another GAN is opened I will happily review it. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 16:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:26, 19 July 2014

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jamesx12345 (talk · contribs) 22:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this in the next week or so. Jamesx12345 22:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First up, this article is really short. It is around a sixth of the size of the Debian and Ubuntu articles, which suggests that there is a lot of detail not present here. There is no section on hardware requirements or the development process, and details about kernels and packages are left out. The GAC don't require it to be too long, but without significantly more detail I wouldn't pass it. Sorry. Jamesx12345 22:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since there was no response, I'm failing it this time, but if another GAN is opened I will happily review it. Jamesx12345 16:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]