User talk:198.23.81.141: Difference between revisions
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and '''<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Userlogin|type=signup&campaign=anonwelcometemplate}} create an account]</span>'''. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on [[User talk:Robert McClenon|my talk page]], or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:Category:Wikipedians looking for help|helpme]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on this page. We also have an [[WP:TMM|intuitive guide on editing]] if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign and date]] your talk page comments with four tildes ('''~~~~'''). <p>Happy editing! [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 18:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)</p></div> |
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and '''<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Userlogin|type=signup&campaign=anonwelcometemplate}} create an account]</span>'''. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on [[User talk:Robert McClenon|my talk page]], or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:Category:Wikipedians looking for help|helpme]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on this page. We also have an [[WP:TMM|intuitive guide on editing]] if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign and date]] your talk page comments with four tildes ('''~~~~'''). <p>Happy editing! [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 18:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)</p></div> |
||
== Regarding Russia's GDP discussion == |
|||
== Discretionary Sanctions == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[ee|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:Your not making any sense Robert McClenon. ''Portions of [[Russia]], including the capital of [[Moscow]] are in [[Eastern Europe]] as usually defined, so that disruptive editing is subject to sanctions'' This is not Russia to place sanctions like the media is talking about, this is about the source, content and ip hoping on a user who is pushing the agenda since 2013. Are you related to this editor? |
:Your not making any sense Robert McClenon. ''Portions of [[Russia]], including the capital of [[Moscow]] are in [[Eastern Europe]] as usually defined, so that disruptive editing is subject to sanctions'' This is not Russia to place sanctions like the media is talking about, this is about the source, content and ip hoping on a user who is pushing the agenda since 2013. Are you related to this editor? |
||
Revision as of 21:49, 22 July 2014
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
- Create new pages, and customize the appearance and behavior of the website
- Rename pages
- Edit semi-protected pages
- Upload images
- Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed
- Utilize a vast array of editing tools
In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place{{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~). Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Regarding Russia's GDP discussion
Portions of Russia, including the capital of Moscow are in Eastern Europe as usually defined, so that disruptive editing is subject to sanctions. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Your not making any sense Robert McClenon. Portions of Russia, including the capital of Moscow are in Eastern Europe as usually defined, so that disruptive editing is subject to sanctions This is not Russia to place sanctions like the media is talking about, this is about the source, content and ip hoping on a user who is pushing the agenda since 2013. Are you related to this editor?
- Second Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
- What behavior?
- controversial topics, what topic is controversial?
- What disruption?
- sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing? Really, where are the notes of sanctions, show me where please?
- I clearly don't understand your point on sanctions on Wikipedia and how I disrupted anything? Where, show me where please? Third sanctions are referring to financial lock down, so where did this come from? I've been using Wikipedia for 10 years, never has anybody stated sanctions before on Wikipedia. Am I being sanctioned for mentioning the name Russia or are you trying to sanction me for making a report of anti Russia POV pushing? I am really am clued on what your allegations are?
- Are you calling me Russian or Pro-Russian here to make the threat of sanctions? I am completely lost here on the comments you made on my talkpage.
--198.23.81.141 (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- You disrupted the user page of User:Gladio4772 with a lengthy post that amounts to a rant. A user's user page is normally under control of the user. That is why I warned you of sanctions. You ask where the notes of sanctions are. I am not sure whether you are asking about international sanctions, or about Wikipedia discretionary sanctions. Where the Wikipedia sanctions are is: WP:ARBEE. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, define rant? I reported it, I showed the information of ip hoping. Did you bother to look at the ip's on all traces referring to the same ip or called it rant first? I am looking at your involvement on the discussion Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, this was started on July 19, it lists are you are the author of Talk:Russia#MISTAKE IN RANKING NOMINAL GDP.It's 9th!: here is your contribution here http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADispute_resolution_noticeboard&diff=617618864&oldid=617601957
Noticed how the discussion is closed after 3 days only. Is rather interesting isn't it? From July 19 19:45 opened to July 22 18:01 closed.
You stated There is a dispute about Russia's ranking among other nations in terms on GDP. This is a content dispute, but is getting heated, due to one editor accusing others of vandalism.
Upon this discussion history here http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADispute_resolution_noticeboard&diff=617999036&oldid=617617819 there was one editor who abused the discussion but is also interesting that the comments where not removed but allowed in. When you stated This is a content dispute, but is getting heated, due to one editor accusing others of vandalism but you didn't step in, you allowed it. I am concerned what was your involvement in this discussion if you started the discussion but you didn't see the alert on contributions. Why didn't you questioned it? If you started the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard Talk:Russia#MISTAKE IN RANKING NOMINAL GDP.It's 9th discussion, there should of been questioning there to begin with. A conflict of interest? I see the discussion as a possible setup, if not where is the police on this discussion?--198.23.81.141 (talk) 21:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)