Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Yacht: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::@Sca, it at 80 feet is actually considered a Super Yacht, and I do not think that anyone in the boating community would ever consider this just a Speed Boat. With regard to Aesthetic value, Commons has few Aerial photos of any boats [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go-fast_boat#mediaviewer/File:Gofast.jpg this one] is from the DEA, Created: 2004-12-01 or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go-fast_boat#mediaviewer/File:USCG_pursuing_gofast_boat.jpg this one] a coast guard shot from 2007, are the only aerial photos I have seen. [[User talk:WPPilot|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:WPPilot|WPPilot]] '''</span> 15:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC) |
::@Sca, it at 80 feet is actually considered a Super Yacht, and I do not think that anyone in the boating community would ever consider this just a Speed Boat. With regard to Aesthetic value, Commons has few Aerial photos of any boats [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go-fast_boat#mediaviewer/File:Gofast.jpg this one] is from the DEA, Created: 2004-12-01 or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go-fast_boat#mediaviewer/File:USCG_pursuing_gofast_boat.jpg this one] a coast guard shot from 2007, are the only aerial photos I have seen. [[User talk:WPPilot|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:WPPilot|WPPilot]] '''</span> 15:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
* '''Comment''' I very much liked the original here, which I thought striking indeed. But I can't fault the technical objections raised. If it was a historical image, then per the guidelines that wouldn't matter. But that's not the case here and frankly Pilot has to up his (her) game. It's a bore, I agree. I have a whole load of images shot on my own gear I know are very fine from a compositional point of view, but I can't in all honesty advance them as "featured". [[User:Coat of Many Colours|Coat of Many Colours]] ([[User talk:Coat of Many Colours|talk]]) 22:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC) |
* '''Comment''' I very much liked the original here, which I thought striking indeed. But I can't fault the technical objections raised. If it was a historical image, then per the guidelines that wouldn't matter. But that's not the case here and frankly Pilot has to up his (her) game. It's a bore, I agree. I have a whole load of images shot on my own gear I know are very fine from a compositional point of view, but I can't in all honesty advance them as "featured". [[User:Coat of Many Colours|Coat of Many Colours]] ([[User talk:Coat of Many Colours|talk]]) 22:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: Wow that was a fun ride from" ''Yes, excellent''" to "''It's a bore''" in a few short hours. OK, ''Coat of Many Colours'' thank you for your comments, I have, in the past already been able to retain a featured photo status for aerial shots of yachts: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cabo_San_Lucas_Race_Start_2013_photo_D_Ramey_Logan.jpg| File:Cabo San Lucas Race Start 2013 photo D Ramey Logan.jpg] and perhaps, if the airplane in your own gear bag is running ok would you mind showing me how it is I "up my game", as I would love to know, what your talking about in detail. Aerial photos here, on Wikipedia are not that common nor relatively easy to get as it is not easy to fly, and shoot but please do tell as its better to has Game up, rather then the yoyo ride I think I just took :) |
:: Wow that was a fun ride from" ''Yes, excellent''" to "''It's a bore''" in a few short hours. OK, ''Coat of Many Colours'' thank you for your comments, I have, in the past already been able to retain a featured photo status for aerial shots of yachts: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cabo_San_Lucas_Race_Start_2013_photo_D_Ramey_Logan.jpg| File:Cabo San Lucas Race Start 2013 photo D Ramey Logan.jpg] and perhaps, if the airplane in your own gear bag is running ok would you mind showing me how it is I "up my game", as I would love to know, what your talking about in detail. Aerial photos here, on Wikipedia are not that common nor relatively easy to get as it is not easy to fly, and shoot but please do tell as its better to has Game up, rather then the yoyo ride I think I just took :) [[User talk:WPPilot|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:WPPilot|WPPilot]] '''</span> 02:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
Revision as of 02:34, 24 July 2014
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 01:41:22 (UTC)
- Reason
- Wonderful high res photo of a 80 foot motor yacht at full speed taken from aircraft.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Yacht - Motorboat - Luxury yacht - Gulfstar Yachts
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water
- Creator
- WPPilot
- Support as nominator – talk→ WPPilot 01:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Yes, excellent. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Lots of noise, especially chroma noise. Seems underexposed and lacking detail. The angle-of-view would be more involving if lower. Is this really our best picture of a yacht? -- Colin°Talk
- Comment See Alt:. talk→ WPPilot 21:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose — Speedboat on water. EV? Aesthetic value? Sca (talk) 02:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Sca, it at 80 feet is actually considered a Super Yacht, and I do not think that anyone in the boating community would ever consider this just a Speed Boat. With regard to Aesthetic value, Commons has few Aerial photos of any boats this one is from the DEA, Created: 2004-12-01 or this one a coast guard shot from 2007, are the only aerial photos I have seen. talk→ WPPilot 15:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I very much liked the original here, which I thought striking indeed. But I can't fault the technical objections raised. If it was a historical image, then per the guidelines that wouldn't matter. But that's not the case here and frankly Pilot has to up his (her) game. It's a bore, I agree. I have a whole load of images shot on my own gear I know are very fine from a compositional point of view, but I can't in all honesty advance them as "featured". Coat of Many Colours (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Wow that was a fun ride from" Yes, excellent" to "It's a bore" in a few short hours. OK, Coat of Many Colours thank you for your comments, I have, in the past already been able to retain a featured photo status for aerial shots of yachts: File:Cabo San Lucas Race Start 2013 photo D Ramey Logan.jpg and perhaps, if the airplane in your own gear bag is running ok would you mind showing me how it is I "up my game", as I would love to know, what your talking about in detail. Aerial photos here, on Wikipedia are not that common nor relatively easy to get as it is not easy to fly, and shoot but please do tell as its better to has Game up, rather then the yoyo ride I think I just took :) talk→ WPPilot 02:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC)