Jump to content

Head/tail breaks: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 617935047 by Digmaa (talk) linkspam
Digmaa (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tag: possible conflict of interest
Line 21: Line 21:
* Jiang, Bin (2014), Head/tail breaks for visualizing the fractal or scaling structure of geographic features, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spacetimelab/stlab-news-publication/bin-jiang-geospatial
* Jiang, Bin (2014), Head/tail breaks for visualizing the fractal or scaling structure of geographic features, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spacetimelab/stlab-news-publication/bin-jiang-geospatial
* Lin, Yue (2013), A comparison study on natural and head/tail breaks involving digital elevation models. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:658963
* Lin, Yue (2013), A comparison study on natural and head/tail breaks involving digital elevation models. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:658963

== External links ==
Head/tail breaks on single data array, https://github.com/digmaa/HeadTailBreaks


{{DEFAULTSORT:Head tail Breaks}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Head tail Breaks}}

Revision as of 08:27, 26 July 2014

Head/tail breaks is a new clustering algorithm scheme for data with a heavy-tailed distribution such as power laws and lognormal. The heavy-tailed distribution can be simply referred to the scaling pattern of far more small things than large ones. The classification is done through dividing things into large (or called the head) and small (or called the tail) things around the arithmetic mean or average, and then recursively going on for the dividing process for the large things until far more small things than large ones is no longer valid, or with more or less similar things left only.[1]

Motivation

The head/tail breaks is mainly motivated by inability of conventional classification methods such as equal intervals, quantiles, geometric progressions, standard deviation, and Jenks natural breaks optimization for revealing the underlying scaling pattern of far more small things than large ones. Note that the notion of far more small things than large one is not just referred to geometric property, but also to topological and semantic properties. In this connection, the notion should be interpreted as far more unpopular (or less-connected) things than popular (or well-connected) ones, or far more meaningless things than meaningful ones.

Method

Given some variable X that demonstrates a heavy-tailed distribution, there are far more small x than large ones. Take the average of all xi, and obtain the first mean m1. Then calculate the second mean for those xi greater than m1, and obtain m2. In the same recursive way, we can get m3 depending on whether the ending condition of no longer far more small x than large ones is met. For simplicity, we assume there are four means, m1, m2, and m3. This classification leads to four classes: [minimum, m1], (m1, m2], (m2, m3], (m3, maximum]. The resulting number of classes is referred to as ht-index, an alternative index to fractal dimension for characterizing complexity of fractals or geographic features: the higher the ht-index, the more complex the fractals.[2]

Applications

Instead of more or less similar things, there are far more small things than large ones surrounding us. Given the ubiquity of the scaling pattern, head/tail breaks is found to be of use to statistical mapping, map generalization, cognitive mapping and even perception of beauty .[3][4][5] It helps visualizing the underlying scaling pattern of far more small things than large ones.

References

Template:One author

  1. ^ Jiang, Bin 2013a. "Head/tail breaks: A new classification scheme for data with a heavy-tailed distribution", The Professional Geographer, 65 (3), 482 – 494.
  2. ^ Jiang, Bin and Yin Junjun 2014. "Ht-index for quantifying the fractal or scaling structure of geographic features", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(3), 530–541.
  3. ^ Jiang, Bin, Liu, Xintao and Jia, Tao (2013). "Scaling of geographic space as a universal rule for map generalization", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 844 – 855.
  4. ^ Jiang, Bin (2013b). "The image of the city out of the underlying scaling of city artifacts or locations", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(6), 1552-1566.
  5. ^ Jiang, Bin and Sui, Daniel (2013). "A new kind of beauty out of the underlying scaling of geographic space", The Professional Geographer, DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2013.852037

Further reading

Head/tail breaks on single data array, https://github.com/digmaa/HeadTailBreaks