User talk:Wesha: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:28, 9 August 2014

Welcome!

Hello, Wesha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

I reverted your change on the July 12 article because the general format for such pages asks that the second date listing not be hyperlinked. Kingturtle 20:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rs132damage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rs132damage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Streisand effect

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Streisand effect, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pixelface 18:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008 South Ossetia War

Hello, you have contributed to the article. Currently there is a vote seeking to change the name of said article. Can you please vote as you feel is right? HistoricWarrior007 (talk) 06:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing survey

Hi Wesha. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University in the United States. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic current events articles on Wikipedia. I have noticed in the talk page archives at 2008 South Ossetia war that you have contributed to the editing or maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below. An explanation of my project is included with the survey.

Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=kLMxj8dkk_2bls7yCBmNV7bg_3d_3d

Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons lyonspen | (talk) 21:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an Arbcom restriction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:35, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rs82lagg3.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rs82lagg3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rs132damage.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rs132damage.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Troll (Internet); it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 14:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey hey, it IS an appropriate image. Please READ the article before complaining. -- Wesha (talk) 23:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Underground rocket schematics

Hey there. This is in reply to your post in the graphics lab. I would be happy to redraw the schematics if you can provide a translation. Roshan (talk) 14:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Huffington Post, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Streisand effect for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Streisand effect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streisand effect (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Ṟ Ṉ 02:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Able Archer 83

Hi. You recently made an edit to the Able Archer 83 Article saying it was a 10-day exercise starting on 2 November 83 rather than a 5-day exercise starting on 7 November.

I think you may be confusing the scenario with the exercise itself. Exercises have a scenario as a context, explaining what has (for purposes of the exercise) been assumed to have been happening. It sets the stage for the exercise itself. In this case, the scenario began with (fictional) events on 2 November through 6 November which led up to the exercise itself that began on 7 November and continued through 11 November.

I refer you to the quotation from the SHAPE historian, Dr. Gregory Pedlow, at the bottom of the section on "Exercise Able Archer 83" in the Article, that explains the war game:

"The exercise scenario began with Orange (the hypothetical opponent) opening hostilities in all regions of ACE on 4 November (three days before the start of the exercise) and Blue (NATO) declaring a general alert. Orange initiated the use of chemical weapons on 6 November and by the end of that day had used such weapons throughout ACE. All of these events had taken place prior to the start of the exercise and were simply part of the written scenario. There had thus been three days of fighting and a deteriorating situation prior to the start of the exercise. This was desired because — as previously stated — the purpose of the exercise was to test procedures for transitioning from conventional to nuclear operations. As a result of Orange advance, its persistent use of chemical weapons, and its clear intentions to rapidly commit second echelon forces, SACEUR requested political guidance on the use of nuclear weapons early on Day 1 of the exercise (7 November 1983)..."

Note that he explicitly says that the events before 7 November "had taken place prior to the start of the exercise and were simply part of the written scenario." He also explicitly notes that Day 1 of the exercise was 7 November 1983.

I am aware that some second-and third-hand sources make the same error of confusing the scenario with the exercise, but according to SHAPE it was a 5-day exercise starting on 7 November.

May I recommend that you correct your edit yourself? Or, if you have good authority showing that the SHAPE historian was in error, perhaps you could provide it.

Thanks. D.A.Timm (talk) 09:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]