User talk:Mhbeals: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There's more discussion of your flow chart going on. I'm not sure if they are discussing its applicability in the academic discipline of history or in Wikipedia. I thought the discussion had made it clear that the flow chart wasn't directly applicable in Wikipedia, but maybe you can't expect everyone to read everything... or maybe I'm getting the wrong end of the stick somewhere. [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 17:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC) |
There's more discussion of your flow chart going on. I'm not sure if they are discussing its applicability in the academic discipline of history or in Wikipedia. I thought the discussion had made it clear that the flow chart wasn't directly applicable in Wikipedia, but maybe you can't expect everyone to read everything... or maybe I'm getting the wrong end of the stick somewhere. [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 17:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks for letting me know. Been on real world sabbatical. I have responded but I believe there may be some fundamental philosophical differences of opinion, if I understand the criticisms corrrectly. [[User:Mhbeals|Mhbeals]] ([[User talk:Mhbeals#top|talk]]) 18:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC) |
::Thanks for letting me know. Been on real world sabbatical. I have responded but I believe there may be some fundamental philosophical differences of opinion, if I understand the criticisms corrrectly. [[User:Mhbeals|Mhbeals]] ([[User talk:Mhbeals#top|talk]]) 18:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Disambiguation link notification for August 10== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Dumfries Courier]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Annan]] and [[John McDiarmid]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:25, 10 August 2014
There's more discussion of your flow chart going on. I'm not sure if they are discussing its applicability in the academic discipline of history or in Wikipedia. I thought the discussion had made it clear that the flow chart wasn't directly applicable in Wikipedia, but maybe you can't expect everyone to read everything... or maybe I'm getting the wrong end of the stick somewhere. Yaris678 (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. Been on real world sabbatical. I have responded but I believe there may be some fundamental philosophical differences of opinion, if I understand the criticisms corrrectly. Mhbeals (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)