User talk:The Satanic Sheik

Can I ask why you left a message on CurtisNaito's talk page about your edits to the Jimmu article?

To be fair, he never actually edited that article until recently, and then only to re-insert questionable material that I had removed. There was a MASSIVE discussion on the talk page, in which numerous other users agreed that the material should not be re-added. I don't blame you for not reading the discussion, but I would advise you to read WP:CANVAS before posting notifications to one side of a previously-resolved content dispute. If you want to argue about discussion of National Foundation Day in the Jimmu article, that's a discussion I might be willing to have, but please keep discussion to the article talk page, and if you must notify other user's on their talk pages please notify all parties equally. 126.0.96.220 (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey look! It’s an angry sockpuppet. You don’t want to mess with me. Move along. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 06:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

And who are you, the proud lord said, that I must bow so low? Only a cat of a different coat, that's all the truth I know. In a coat of gold or a coat of red, a lion still has claws, and mine are long and sharp, my lord, as long and sharp as yours. And so he spoke, and so he spoke, that lord of Castamere, but now the rains weep o'er his halls with no one there to hear. Yes, now the rains weep o'er his halls, with not a soul to hear. 126.0.96.220 (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

When you tell girls that you are Wikipedia troll, I bet they are impressed. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm an honest person, and if I don't tell girls that you're a Wikipedia troll (something that's true) why would I tell them that I'm a Wikipedia troll (something that isn't)? :P 126.0.96.220 (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

So it only looks like trolling? My mistake. I'm sure you are thinking only of improving the encyclopedia. After all, you not the kind of guy who who would post ridiculous accusations on random talk pages simply in the hope of generating stupid arguments. Because that really would be trolling. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Excuse me? I asked about a half-dozen times how you randomly stumbled across an article in which I had been involved in a content dispute recently, and all of your edits were either simply reformatting the article (i.e., you moved information around but didn't add anything, indicating that you learned everything you know from our Wikipedia article) or reverting me. Seriously, how did this chain of events come about? Why are you even here? I edit articles on topics of interest of me, and get in conflicts when either other editors with an interest in the topic disagree with me or random trolls who blame me for them previously having been site-banned come along and start trolling me. I wonder which one you are... 126.0.96.220 (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

You obviously love to argue. You happily take one point of view in one post and the opposite in the next. It's all about being as big a pain in the neck as possible, I suppose. You must be laughing harder each time you write more of this nonsense. After you came here and spewed your batshit, I immediately and correctly identified you as troll. You think I'm trolling you? This is my talk page! Now you're back for more. There is only one explanation: In your screwed up mind, which I imagine is located somewhere near the middle of your screwed up universe, "troll" is the highest compliment you are ever likely to recieve. So of course you're hungry for more. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 10:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Okay, you've accused me of "taking one point of view in one post and the opposite in the next" at least three times now, but none of my posts immediately preceding said accusations could be reasonably taken as doing so, and you have yet to cite a single example of me doing so. My stance on the Jinmu article has not changed. I engaged in compromise with User:Nishidani and User:Sturmgewehr88 when they made suggestions that I didn't entirely agree with. Please read WP:COMPROMISE: upholding a consensus decision that one had previously negotiated and hadn't got 100% of what one originally requested is not "taking one point of view in one post and the opposite in the next". But I don't see where I even did that. You are trolling me. Your only edit to this encyclopedia has been to an article in a subject-area you know nothing about and have no interest in (checking newspaper archives for information on ancient history/literature? seriously?), solely in order to get a rise out me. That is the very definition of trolling. 126.0.96.220 (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh, and given that your account's whole purpose is to troll me (seriously, how did you come across the Jimmu dispute, and why were you reading JoshuSasori's "HijiriWatch" blog?) you can't possibly claim I'm trolling you simply by posting to your talk page. Your talk page (as well as your account) only exists as a result of your desire to troll me. 126.0.96.220 (talk) 15:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

National Foundation Day is an "ancient history/literature" subject? I had no idea. I see that my last post was not enough to convince you that you're not welcome here. You're a troll because your agenda is all about one upping other editors, as opposed to improving the encyclopedia. I am trying to improve the article, but I've had my hands full replying to all your messages and accusations. When I took a break from editing, you charged over here demanding answers. That's how much you crave my abuse, you poor sick thing. So let's get down to brass tacks. Why does a single "honest person" need nineteen Wikipedia accounts? Did you lose your password nineteen times? Is someone handing out an award to the "Wikipedian with the most sockpuppets"? Please help me better understand what it is you're trying to accomplish. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 10:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

National Foundation Day is an "ancient history/literature" subject? I had no idea. I see that my last post was not enough to convince you that you're not welcome here. Actually, in case you haven't noticed, the article in question is not about National Foundation Day. It's about Japan's legendary first emperor and a principal character in Japan's oldest literary work. You're a troll because your agenda is all about one upping other editors, as opposed to improving the encyclopedia. I am trying to improve the article, but I've had my hands full replying to all your messages and accusations. I laid out the details of why your edits to that article are appropriate. I was editing that article and other articles in the area nine years ago. You appeared suddenly solely in order to annoy me. Therefore, it is who is the troll. Why does a single "honest person" need nineteen Wikipedia accounts? Did you lose your password nineteen times? Is someone handing out an award to the "Wikipedian with the most sockpuppets"? How many of these accounts have I edited from within the last year? How many accounts have you edited from within the last year? Who are you? Are you someone other than User:Kauffner? Or are you someone else?126.0.96.220 (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

So you not going tell me why you created so many accounts? Well, they say online privacy is hot these days. To start with the premise that the subject of article is strictly ancient history is to assume an answer. When I add information about the holiday, various editors "thank" me. So I am not only one who thinks it should be mentioned. Perhaps others are afraid of you, or just exhausted by your constant bickering. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 07:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Re:

Just because technical limitations of CU prevented you from getting blocked as a confirmed sock of Kauffner, doesn't change the fact you obviously are. See you on WP:ANI. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)