Talk:Lost Luggage (video game): Difference between revisions
TonyTheTiger (talk | contribs) four=yes |
Promoted to featured article |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
{{Article history |
{{Article history |
||
| action1 = GAN |
| action1 = GAN |
||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
| action2oldid = 615199473 |
| action2oldid = 615199473 |
||
| |
| action3 = FAC |
||
| action3date = 01:58, 10 August 2014 |
|||
| action3link = Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Lost Luggage (video game)/archive1 |
|||
| action3result = promoted |
|||
| action3oldid = 620578938 |
|||
| currentstatus = FA |
|||
| itndate = |
| itndate = |
||
| dykdate = 16 June 2014 |
| dykdate = 16 June 2014 |
||
Line 21: | Line 26: | ||
|four=yes |
|four=yes |
||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{featured article candidates|Lost Luggage (video game)/archive1}} |
|||
{{Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)/GA1}} |
{{Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)/GA1}} |
Revision as of 15:38, 13 August 2014
Lost Luggage (video game) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I love that there was no room on the cartridge for a luggage train! Skycap is unfamiliar. Even though there's a wikilink, would it be appropriate to say "skycap porter" or something? Otherwise, everything reads beautifully, there's nothing that needs tweaking. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Went with skycap porter. Thanks for looking over the article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 16:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
We're now at 55 GAs in the 1980s video games category! I have to say, this was one of the cleanest, GA-ready articles I've had the pleasure of reviewing. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Im not sure quite what to say. Is this being a featured artivle intended as some kind of joke? Whilst well written and technically acceptable it is, to put mildly, not of much interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.120.173 (talk) 20:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well they can't all be winners. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Featured articles are chosen purely for how well they cover their topic, not for how interesting the topic is. It is a bit weird to see such random stuff featured though. --74.128.224.174 (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)