Talk:Fantastic Four (2015 film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:03, 13 August 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fantastic Four (2015 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Film: Comic book Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.

Comics: Marvel / Films Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Proposed title move: "Untitled Fantastic Four reboot" → "The Fantastic Four (2015 film)"

Both IMDb and ComingSoon.net have listed this as the film's official title, and even its listing on the 2015 in film article calls it that. It may be just a working title, but I think it would be fair to use that as the article title for the time being.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 11:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: IMDb is not a reliable source, other wikipages can not be used to verify something, and the big one, no official title has been announced. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Doombots' is ONLY a rumor in the film..

Those Doombot references/information need to be cut because it's only a rumor, not actually confirmed to be featured in the film. Also, I'd like to point out that Tim Blake's (as it has been rumored / said) role will be a minor one, and will actually be expanded upon in the film's sequel. 71.188.21.140 (talk) 01:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible source to confirm title?

Is this Hollywood Reporter direct quoting Watts, or them just using their own formatting for the title? I want to lean as it being Watts explicitly saying "The Fantastic Four" meaning it to be the title. [1] - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:49, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where do we mention the controversies?

I realize that we can't fill the article with every fanboy rage somebody reports on a blog or whatever, but some of the controversies surrounding this movie, particularly regarding Jordan's casting and Mara's comments about the comics, have received enough media attention to merit some sort of mention (the latter was covered by Indiewire and Entertainment Weekly, while the complaints about Jordan were covered by /Film, The Wrap, and even a Cracked.com humor article). So my question is, how do we incorporate this info into the article? Should it have its own Controversy section, or should it just be incorporated into one of the existing sections (Cast, Development, etc.)?--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 21:39, 21 July 2014 (U

I think it should have it's section in this article names "Controversies". --Wikieditor14 (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 == Where do we mention the controversies? ==
-I realize that we can't fill the article with every fanboy rage somebody reports on a blog or whatever, but some of the controversies surrounding this movie, particularly regarding Jordan's casting and Mara's comments about the comics, have received enough media attention to merit some sort of mention (the latter was covered by [http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/kate-mara-says-the-fantastic-four-movie-wont-be-based-on-the-comic-book-20140715 Indiewire] and [http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/07/16/kate-maras-fanatastic-four/ Entertainment Weekly], while the complaints about Jordan were covered by [http://www.slashfilm.com/controversy-black-human-torch/ /Film], [http://www.thewrap.com/michael-b-jordan-fantastic-four-racist-backlash-expected/ The Wrap], and even a [http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/the-5-most-insulting-defenses-nerd-racism/ Cracked.com] humor article). So my question is, how do we incorporate this info into the article? Should it have its own Controversy section, or should it just be incorporated into one of the existing sections (Cast, Development, etc.)?--[[User:Invisiboy42293|Invisiboy42293]] ([[User talk:Invisiboy42293|talk]]) 21:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
+I realize that we can't fill the article with every fanboy rage somebody reports on a blog or whatever, but some of the controversies surrounding this movie, particularly regarding Jordan's casting and Mara's comments about the comics, have received enough media attention to merit some sort of mention (the latter was covered by [http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/kate-mara-says-the-fantastic-four-movie-wont-be-based-on-the-comic-book-20140715 Indiewire] and [http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/07/16/kate-maras-fanatastic-four/ Entertainment Weekly], while the complaints about Jordan were covered by [http://www.slashfilm.com/controversy-black-human-torch/ /Film], [http://www.thewrap.com/michael-b-jordan-fantastic-four-racist-backlash-expected/ The Wrap], and even a [http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/the-5-most-insulting-defenses-nerd-racism/ Cracked.com] humor article). So my question is, how do we incorporate this info into the article? Should it have its own Controversy section, or should it just be incorporated into one of the existing sections (Cast, Development, etc.)?--[[User:Invisiboy42293|Invisiboy42293]] ([[User talk:Invisiboy42293|talk]]) 21:39, 21 July 2014 (U
+I think it should have it's section in this article names "Controversies". --[[User:Wikieditor14|Wikieditor14]] ([[User talk:Wikieditor14|talk]]) 18:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)