Talk:Existential crisis: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Another Case of POV: {{unsigned2}} |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Another Case of POV == |
== Another Case of POV == |
||
This article is horribly vague and a perfect example of it's POV is it's solutions to existential crises. It seems to say that say factually that people who aren't having an existential crises or are in one can only come to 3 conclusions, ignoring thousands of existential psychotherapists and such who can say otherwise. |
This article is horribly vague and a perfect example of it's POV is it's solutions to existential crises. It seems to say that say factually that people who aren't having an existential crises or are in one can only come to 3 conclusions, ignoring thousands of existential psychotherapists and such who can say otherwise.<small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:24.4.134.125|24.4.134.125]] ([[User talk:24.4.134.125|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/24.4.134.125|contribs]]) 06:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
||
Revision as of 06:15, 5 July 2006
Is this page meant to be a joke or something? Half of t makes no sense, and the other half is at best uninformative. BobThePirate 18:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
It's actually hysterical, and totally appropriate. A little more definitive would be nice, but this'll do just fine for a laugh. Which I guess is whatcha need if you're looking it up.
Wikipedia, the world's first comedy encyclopedia... I guess people who actually want to know what an existential crisis is will have to go elsewhere. BobThePirate 17:39, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
too bad its not funny anymore. i think the best thing for an existential crisis is prolly humor. ive been feeling pretty nihilistic lately Everything Inane 03:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, well, on the plus side people who read the page now will at least find out what an existential crisis actually is. I had been wondering about that for a while, now I know. BobThePirate 22:37, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Sources? NPOV?
"The essence of who one is and why one exists is believed to have not been defined before birth" WHAT? BY WHOM? I've cleaned that up, put soem more links and put the article for general clean up. --Procrastinating@talk2me 14:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
"The realization of one's own moratality"
Is this a spelling error? Instr 19:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Naturally. be bold. fix it.--Procrastinating@talk2me 20:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Another Case of POV
This article is horribly vague and a perfect example of it's POV is it's solutions to existential crises. It seems to say that say factually that people who aren't having an existential crises or are in one can only come to 3 conclusions, ignoring thousands of existential psychotherapists and such who can say otherwise.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.4.134.125 (talk • contribs) 06:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)