User talk:Ziva 84: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:38, 1 September 2014

Persistent revert/restore behavior

Hi there. I noticed that back in August, you reverted a change I made to ISketch, then restored my change, and went on to do the same thing to several other edits on that page as well. In none of your changes did you leave an edit notice as to why you were doing this, so it's difficult to tell if you were experimenting, if you'd made a mistake, or if you had some reason for doing this. I've recently restored a third-party-source notice that an IP editor had originally put there and which you removed, restored and then removed again. Per WP:BRD, please open a topic on the Talk page if you feel edits are inappropriate - for instance, we could have a discussion on the difference between "cheating" and "griefing" to determine which term is more appropriate for the article.

I noticed also that you tend to just blank this Talk page without replying to anyone who's attempted to communicate with you, so I assume that you'll do the same here and give me no indication that you've read my text to you. That's fine, but just be warned that inappropriate reverting of non-vandalism content may violate some of Wikipedia's policies (particularly the 3-Revert Rule, and can result in notices to the Administrator's Noticeboard. I will assume that your blanking of your talk page constitutes an acknowledgement, and I will follow standard procedures in the future.

Personally, I'd much rather work constructively with you to improve article quality instead of reacting to disruption. Will you work with us? Thanks. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 19:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== Persistent revert/restore behavior ==
+Hi there.  I noticed that back in August, you reverted a change I made to [[ISketch]], then restored my change, and went on to do the same thing to several other edits on that page as well.  In none of your changes did you leave an edit notice as to why you were doing this, so it's difficult to tell if you were experimenting, if you'd made a mistake, or if you had some reason for doing this.  I've recently restored a third-party-source notice that an IP editor had originally put there and which you removed, restored and then removed again.  Per [[WP:BRD]], please open a topic on the Talk page if you feel edits are inappropriate - for instance, we could have a discussion on the difference between "cheating" and "griefing" to determine which term is more appropriate for the article.
+I noticed also that you tend to just blank this Talk page without replying to anyone who's attempted to communicate with you, so I assume that you'll do the same here and give me no indication that you've read my text to you.  That's fine, but just be warned that inappropriate reverting of non-vandalism content may violate some of Wikipedia's policies (particularly the [[WP:3RR|3-Revert Rule]], and can result in notices to the [[WP:AN|Administrator's Noticeboard]].  I will assume that your blanking of your talk page constitutes an acknowledgement, and I will follow standard procedures in the future.
+Personally, I'd much rather work constructively with you to improve article quality instead of reacting to disruption.  Will you work with us?  Thanks. &mdash; '''[[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]]''' ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) &mdash; 19:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)