Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sutton twin towns mural: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 12:28, 10 September 2014

Sutton twin towns mural

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a mural where the reliable secondary sources consist of one local article ([1]the Sutton Guardian, a localized page of the Guardian)? The only other source I could find, also a local paper[2], is a copy of the press release by the Sutton Press Office[3].

These murals for the moment lack the necessary Notability to have an article here. Fram (talk) 09:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article has already been cleared for DYK. AfD seems inconsistent. In addition to the three sources already in the article, I've found this interesting feature on Sutton which highlights the mural [4] A P Monblat (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK doesn't check for notability. Wordpress blogs don't count, and the three sources are the repeat of the press release I linked to above, and two times the exact same article (the local Guardian page) under different headings. So that's still one independent but local source. Fram (talk) 11:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep There are sources, albeit local ones. Street art is not heavily reported. Should check back to 1993 when they were created, but these likely are off line. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually one source (identical in two publications), and one repeat of a press release. Fram (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *''Weak Keep'' There are sources, albeit local ones.  Street art is not heavily reported.  Should check back to 1993 when they were created, but these likely are off line.   <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 11:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 **Actually one source (identical in two publications), and one repeat of a press release. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 11:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)</small>
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts|list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)</small>
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Architecture|list of Architecture-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)</small>