User talk:Fevrret

Welcome to my new talk page!

Welcome to my new talk page! Any question, suggestions? Leave me a new message!

Make sure you sign your message as: ~~~~

Thanks!

Copyright problem: Achraf Baznani (photographer)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Achraf Baznani (photographer), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.graphicart-news.com/wild-imaginative-surrealism-photography-achraf-baznani/#.VA6vjCinBIA, http://www.baznani.com/about-the-artist/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Achraf Baznani (photographer) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Achraf Baznani (photographer), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Achraf Baznani (photographer). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Achraf Baznani (photographer) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Achraf Baznani (photographer) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Things

Saw you mention my name so I've looked around a bit. A couple of things:

1. Here, you really aren't supposed to move other user comments around, even if it might make sense. The reason being that if people reply to various posts, moving what they replied to makes it hard to follow the conversation. Yes Maro was voting many times, which needed to be addressed. The usual way there is to strikethrough like this just the extra keeps, and then leave a note there saying something like "struck multiple votes from the same user". See This one for example of how that should go.
2. The above does absolutely not excuse those personal attacks that were thrown at you, of course.
3. On User talk:Pietaster: He is what we call Autopatrolled, meaning that he makes so many new articles, and can be trusted to make good ones, that his articles are automatically marked as reviewed. Un-reviewing them like that is not good, and hopefully he won't take offense, as you're still new at this.

Just a reminder to go slow and consider the Why's as well as the What's for the way things go here. Crow^Talk 22:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

The above didn't meet WP:CIV and attacked me directly for being a sock muppet.

Yes I understand that (my point #2 above). Crow^Talk 22:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Maromania

How do you know Maromania? Do you know Rojer1212? Crow^Talk 21:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I do not know Maromania. I just referred that he felt accused too. No, I don't know Rojert1212. --Fevrret (talk) 23:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing and likely abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Randykitty (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Fevrret (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not created multiple accounts as said. I do not accept this type of behavior Fevrret (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not created multiple accounts as said. I do not accept this type of behavior [[User:Fevrret|Fevrret]] ([[User talk:Fevrret#top|talk]]) 18:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not created multiple accounts as said. I do not accept this type of behavior [[User:Fevrret|Fevrret]] ([[User talk:Fevrret#top|talk]]) 18:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not created multiple accounts as said. I do not accept this type of behavior [[User:Fevrret|Fevrret]] ([[User talk:Fevrret#top|talk]]) 18:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}