Talk:Mahāsamādhi: Difference between revisions
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I don't mean to be disrespectful, but shouldn't this article be checked for neutral point of view and style? It seems to deal with belief, not fact, yet is written as though it is describing fact.[[User:Totorotroll|Totorotroll]] ([[User talk:Totorotroll|talk]]) 18:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC) |
I don't mean to be disrespectful, but shouldn't this article be checked for neutral point of view and style? It seems to deal with belief, not fact, yet is written as though it is describing fact.[[User:Totorotroll|Totorotroll]] ([[User talk:Totorotroll|talk]]) 18:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Indeed. I've added <code>{{unreliable sources}}</code> for a start, but I don't know enough about the topic to really improve the article. [[User:Qwertyus|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus|hm?]])</small> 20:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== So what happens to the body? == |
== So what happens to the body? == |
Revision as of 20:11, 21 September 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mahāsamādhi redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the description, where it says, "cease to live" I think it should say either, "cease to animate the mortal body," or the equivalent. 70.166.123.49 (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions?
Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. a good alternative is Indian religions. The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion". See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
List of people who have attained Mahasamadhi
Should we have a list of people (or saints for that matter) who have attained Mahasamadhi be included in this article? I feel that it would be an interesting inclusion to this article. Any thoughts on this would be most welcomed! --Siva1979Talk to me 15:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's a good idea. Kkrystian 14:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- How could we possibly verify whether or not they had attained Mahasamadhi?—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 14:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Good point. Though I wonder how the internal link "list of..." ended up in this article? If namedropping a source such as Blackman is, then wouldn't it be best to give a few examples from the text. Of the three online sources only one was useful.
Jim Steele (talk) 19:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Point of view
I don't mean to be disrespectful, but shouldn't this article be checked for neutral point of view and style? It seems to deal with belief, not fact, yet is written as though it is describing fact.Totorotroll (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. I've added
for a start, but I don't know enough about the topic to really improve the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable.
So what happens to the body?
When the consciousness leaves the body, according to this teaching, what happens to the body? Is it just an ordinary corpse, is it incorrupt, or does it vaporize, turn to dust, etc...? FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 02:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)