Talk:Pointwise product: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Christian75 (talk | contribs) Assessment: +Mathematics (assisted) |
Adding class, importance & field to maths rating template |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Maths rating}} |
{{Maths rating|class=start|importance=low|field=analysis}} |
||
Argh. How about having this in English? |
Argh. How about having this in English? |
||
: i don't see any obvious way to edit the article. There are plenty of blue links going to encyclopaedic descriptions of the prior knowledge you need. If you don't know what a function is, or you don't know that a function maps from a domain to a codomain, then it'll be difficult to understand the idea of a pointwise product of two functions. There is also an example with f(x) = 2x and g(x) = x + 1. It's difficult to get more introductory than that. |
: i don't see any obvious way to edit the article. There are plenty of blue links going to encyclopaedic descriptions of the prior knowledge you need. If you don't know what a function is, or you don't know that a function maps from a domain to a codomain, then it'll be difficult to understand the idea of a pointwise product of two functions. There is also an example with f(x) = 2x and g(x) = x + 1. It's difficult to get more introductory than that. |
||
Revision as of 20:29, 23 September 2014
 | Mathematics Redirect‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Argh. How about having this in English?
- i don't see any obvious way to edit the article. There are plenty of blue links going to encyclopaedic descriptions of the prior knowledge you need. If you don't know what a function is, or you don't know that a function maps from a domain to a codomain, then it'll be difficult to understand the idea of a pointwise product of two functions. There is also an example with f(x) = 2x and g(x) = x + 1. It's difficult to get more introductory than that.
- The article looks OK to me in it's present 09:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC) state. Maybe someone could add a reference, although mathematical Wikipedia articles tend to get consensus by their internal logic and by using standard terminology, IMHO. Boud (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- It's mysterious how such a simple concept became stretched out into this. If I didn't know better and read this article, I would have thought pointwise products were some high level complicated scholarly topic. 24.85.161.72 (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)