Collectivism (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:58, 2 October 2004

Collectivism, in general, is a term used to describe a theoretical or practical emphasis of the group, as opposed to, and possibly at the expense of, the individual. It is thus directly opposed to individualism, although many collectivists also derive their philosophy from a concern for the well-being of the individual.

Many types of collectivism state that the good of the group is more important than the good of the individual - or, alternatively, that the individual serves his own interests by serving the group's interests, as a bee ultimately serves its own self by serving its hive. Collectivism in this sense is closely associated with altruism. Varieties of collectivism are distinguished in part by which group they mean, for example corporation, national, racial, religious, economic class, or all of humanity.

Politics

Some political systems are based on a form of collectivism known as corporatism - fascism in particular. Nationalism regards people with reference to their nationality. Marxism regards people with reference to their economic class.

Some political collectivists hold that different groups have competing interests, and that the individual's interests and characteristics are in fact tied up with the interests and characteristics of his or her group. Or in other words, that the individual serves his real interests by serving his group's interests. Differences between groups are considered significant, while differences between individuals within groups, to the extent that they are acknowledged at all, are considered unimportant. This line of reasoning, anti-collectivists allege, often leads to the suppression of individual rights, which are sacrificed for the alleged good of the group.

Other political collectivists emphasize the notions of equality and solidarity, and see all human beings as part of the same group, with common interests. They maintain that competition and rivalry between individuals or smaller groups is overall counter-productive or detrimental, and should therefore be replaced with some form of co-operation. Anti-collectivists make the same objections to this form of collectivism as to the previous one, while collectivists defend their views by arguing that the "common good" is only the sum of the "individual good" of every member of the group, and that collectivism therefore benefits the individual. There is also a specifically economic objection, which is that competition is healthy for the economy, and that cooperation in the sense intended here really amounts to anti-competitive combination, or cartel, which harms the economy in a way similar to a monopoly. To this, cooperative collectivists respond by pointing out that cartels and monopolies only hurt the economy insofar as they are forms of "cooperation" in a system that was designed for competition.

Economic Collectivism

Economic collectivism holds that capital and land should be owned by the group and not by the individual. Central to this is the concept of the commons, as opposed to private property. This philosophy coincides with the concept that many (perhaps all) valued commodities are public goods, and are difficult to, or should not be privatized, such as environmental goods, national defense, law enforcement and information goods.

Relying on individual choice for the provision of public goods is seen to lead to market failure and the free rider problem. Collective action, enforced by authorities, social pressure or coercion, is thus seen to be the only reliable means of ensuring a supply of a public good.

Anti-collectivism

Some anti-collectivists, such as Ayn Rand and those influenced by her, reject collectivism as fallacious in theory and immoral in practice. For instance, Rand argued in her essay "Racism" that racism was a crude form of collectivism because it involved judging people, not as individuals, but as members of a racial collective.

In The strange death of capitalist individualism J A Banks argues that liberal capitalism has been seceded by a system of private collectivism, based upon large, hierarchical, and often transnational corporations. These corporations regard their employees as dispensable, interchangeable commodities, ignoring their individuality and only purchasing labour that requires a minimum set of skills. Oligarchic directors with vastly inflated salaries lead from the top of steep corporate hierarchies and are often unaccountable even to shareholders. Private collectivism contrasts with the traditional capitalist mode of production, in which individual capitalists employed workers, invested in capital and collected profits directly, rather than a collective organization (the joint stock corporation).

Anti-capitalists generally see such developments as the inevitable result of capitalism, and argue that the idealized version of capitalism that is supported by Banks and others is something that either never truly existed, cannot exist, or cannot be sustained over time.

Collectivism is also the name of a free magazine for Wolverhampton; see Collectivism (magazine).

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 '''Collectivism''', in general, is a term used to describe a theoretical or practical emphasis of the group, as opposed to, and possibly at the expense of, the individual. It is thus directly opposed to [[individualism]], although many collectivists also derive their philosophy from a concern for the well-being of the individual.
-Many types of collectivism state that the good of the group is more important than the good of the individual&mdash;or, alternatively, that the individual serves his own interests by serving the group's interests, as a bee ultimately serves its own self by serving its hive. Collectivism in this sense is closely associated with [[altruism]]. Varieties of collectivism are distinguished in part by which group they mean, for example corporation, national, racial, religious, economic class, or all of humanity.
+Many types of collectivism state that the good of the group is more important than the good of the individual - or, alternatively, that the individual serves his own interests by serving the group's interests, as a bee ultimately serves its own self by serving its hive. Collectivism in this sense is closely associated with [[altruism]]. Varieties of collectivism are distinguished in part by which group they mean, for example [[corporatism|corporation]], [[Nationalism|national]], [[Nazism|racial]], [[Theocracy|religious]], [[Marxism|economic class]], or [[Meritocracy|all of humanity]].
+==Politics==
-Economic collectivism holds that [[capital (economics)|capital]] and land should be owned by the group and not by the individual. Central to this is the concept of the [[commons]], as opposed to private [[property]]. This philosophy coincides with the reality that many valued commodities are essentially [[public goods]], and are impossible or difficult to [[privatize]], such as [[environmental goods]], national [[defense]], [[law enforcement]] and [[information goods]]. Relying on individual choice for the provision of [[public goods]] will lead to [[market failure]] and the [[free rider problem]]. [[Collective action]], enforced by authorities, social pressure or coercion, may be the only reliable means of ensuring a supply of a public good.
+Some political systems are based on a form of collectivism known as [[corporatism]] - [[fascism]] in particular. [[Nationalism]] regards people with reference to their nationality. [[Marxism]] regards people with reference to their economic class.
+Some political collectivists hold that different groups have competing interests, and that the [[individual]]'s interests and characteristics are in fact tied up with the interests and characteristics of his or her group. Or in other words, that the individual serves his real interests by serving his group's interests. Differences between groups are considered significant, while differences between [[individual]]s within groups, to the extent that they are acknowledged at all, are considered unimportant. This line of reasoning, anti-collectivists allege, often leads to the suppression of [[individual right]]s, which are sacrificed for the alleged good of the group.
-Some political systems are based on a form of collectivism known as [[corporatism]]&mdash;[[fascism]] in particular.  [[Nationalism]] regards people with reference to their nationality.  [[Marxism]] regards people with reference to their economic class.
-Some political collectivists hold that different groups have competing interests, and that the [[individual]]'s interests and characteristics are in fact tied up with the interests and characteristics of his or her group. Or in other words, that the individual serves his real interests by serving his group's interests. Differences between groups are considered significant, while differences between [[individual]]s within groups, to the extent that they are acknowledged at all, are considered unimportant.  This line of reasoning, anti-collectivists allege, often leads to the suppression of [[individual right]]s, which are sacrificed for the alleged good of the group.
 Other political collectivists emphasize the notions of equality and solidarity, and see all human beings as part of the same group, with common interests. They maintain that competition and rivalry between [[individual]]s or smaller groups is overall counter-productive or detrimental, and should therefore be replaced with some form of co-operation. Anti-collectivists make the same objections to this form of collectivism as to the previous one, while collectivists defend their views by arguing that the "common good" is only the sum of the "individual good" of every member of the group, and that collectivism therefore benefits the [[individual]]. There is also a specifically economic objection, which is that competition is healthy for the economy, and that cooperation in the sense intended here really amounts to anti-competitive combination, or cartel, which harms the economy in a way similar to a monopoly. To this, cooperative collectivists respond by pointing out that cartels and monopolies only hurt the economy insofar as they are forms of "cooperation" in a system that was designed for competition.
+==Economic Collectivism==
-Some anti-collectivists, such as [[Ayn Rand]] and those influenced by her, reject collectivism as fallacious in theory and immoral in practice, according to their own personal moral views. For instance, Rand argued in her essay "Racism" that [[racism]] was a crude form of collectivism because it involved judging people, not as individuals, but as members of a racial collective. However, this usage of "collectivism" to refer to general social and cultural groups is unique to Rand, as collectivism generally means a specific system of social organization and economic production. Furthermore, a criticism against one specific form of collectivism is not a criticism against collectivism in general.
+Economic collectivism holds that [[capital (economics)|capital]] and land should be owned by the group and not by the individual. Central to this is the concept of the [[commons]], as opposed to private [[property]]. This philosophy coincides with the concept that many (perhaps all) valued commodities are [[public goods]], and are difficult to, or should not be [[privatize]]d, such as [[environmental goods]], national [[defense]], [[law enforcement]] and [[information goods]].
+Relying on individual choice for the provision of [[public goods]] is seen to lead to [[market failure]] and the [[free rider problem]]. [[Collective action]], enforced by authorities, social pressure or coercion, is thus seen to be the only reliable means of ensuring a supply of a public good.
+==Anti-collectivism==
+Some anti-collectivists, such as [[Ayn Rand]] and those influenced by her, reject collectivism as fallacious in theory and immoral in practice. For instance, Rand argued in her essay "Racism" that [[racism]] was a crude form of collectivism because it involved judging people, not as individuals, but as members of a racial collective.
-In ''The strange death of capitalist individualism'' [[Joseph A Banks|J A Banks]] argues that liberal capitalism has been seceded by a system of private collectivism, based upon large, hierarchical, and often transnational corporations. These corporations regard their employees as dispensable, interchangeable commodities, ignoring their individual potential and only purchasing labour that requires a minimum set of skills. Oligarchic directors with vastly inflated salaries lead from the top of steep corporate hierarchies and are often unaccountable even to shareholders. Private collectivism contrasts with the traditional capitalist mode of production, in which individual capitalists employed workers, invested in capital and collected profits directly, rather than a collective organization (the joint stock corporation).
+In ''The strange death of capitalist individualism'' [[Joseph A Banks|J A Banks]] argues that [[liberal capitalism]] has been seceded by a system of private collectivism, based upon large, hierarchical, and often [[transnational corporation]]s. These corporations regard their employees as dispensable, interchangeable commodities, ignoring their individuality and only purchasing labour that requires a minimum set of skills. [[Oligarchic]] directors with vastly inflated salaries lead from the top of steep corporate hierarchies and are often unaccountable even to shareholders. Private collectivism contrasts with the traditional capitalist mode of production, in which individual capitalists employed workers, invested in capital and collected profits directly, rather than a collective organization (the joint stock corporation).
 Anti-capitalists generally see such developments as the inevitable result of capitalism, and argue that the idealized version of capitalism that is supported by Banks and others is something that either never truly existed, cannot exist, or cannot be sustained over time.