User talk:Sanskari

You are invited to India

Sanskari

on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit
Userpage / Talkpage / About me / Photo Gallery / Created & improved articles / Awards
 42 
India 06:17, 28 December 2024 IST [refresh]

This user has opted out of talkbacks

Note: I don't appreciate {{tb}} instead of this you can use {{reply}} or {{ping}}. I am busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

I seek peace in the religion

File:Meditative smile of the icy blue Buddha statue.jpg

Meditation is the best medicine to restore peace — इषर्ग राजन

16:53:39, 4 October 2014 review of submission by Jds319

• Jds319 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Parviz Kambin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Cutest Penguin: Please help me to understand how to prove the notability of the subject. I have included many references to Dr. Kambin from medical writing and peer review articles. Dr. Kambin is a Pioneer in his field. His finding and inventions have been vetted in the medical community and are being used in the US and throughout the world. Being a pioneer in his field most of the documentation on this subject are his own notes and writings. Any insight or direction you can provide will be welcomed. Jds319 (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Jds319 (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

@Jds319: In order to establish notability you need to find reliable sources like the articles published in th newspaper (it has to be published online) and cite the contents you can follow these below links to learn more on how you can improve your article. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 17:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

• From the editor: The Signpost needs your help

• Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism

• News and notes: Wikipedia article published in peer-reviewed journal; Wikipedia in education

• WikiProject report: Animals, farms, forests, USDA? It must be WikiProject Agriculture

• Traffic report: Shanah Tovah

• Featured content: Brothers at War

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rebecca Bardoux

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rebecca Bardoux. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

07:50:56, 5 October 2014 review of submission by DanielleLachance

• DanielleLachance (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Israel Women’s Network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

DanielleLachance (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello Cutest Penguin,

I see that you had declined by submission, and I was just wondering if you could elaborate on your explanation. I wasn't sure what the following meant: '"As well as it seems to be copyvio from jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/israel-womens-network and some external links used in the article which needs to be removed."' Does "copyvio" mean plagiarized? If so, could you point out what part of my text is plagiarized, because I've read through my text and the text of the webpage and found nothing that seemed to be copied. And which external links need to be removed, and why?

Thank you, I appreciate your feedback!

Danielle

Hello! @DanielleLachance:, it is requested that always sign your post on talkpages by adding ~~~~. Well, copyvio means that the content that you have added in the article is seems to be copied from that particular website whose link has been provided in the draft while declining your submission. Click here to see copvio if you are not sure about what all contents has been copied. In some places in your draft you have directly linked the draft with some URLs such as Prevention of Sexual Harassment Law, Prevention of Family Violence Law, Committee for the Advancement of Women which is not permitted on Wikipedia please avoid poiting direct links. Thanks! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 10:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
7		Delhi School of Management (talk)						Add sources
6		Commonwealth of World Citizens (talk)						Add sources
1		Surpura (talk)						Add sources
14		Bhagwan Parshuram Institute of Technology (talk)						Add sources
50		Faculty of Law, University of Delhi (talk)						Add sources
1,196		Kishore Kumar (talk)						Add sources
27		Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering, Kollam (talk)						Cleanup
150		Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium (Delhi) (talk)						Cleanup
76		Amer, India (talk)						Cleanup
203		Jawaharlal Nehru University (talk)						Expand
28		B.V.B. College of Engineering and Technology (talk)						Expand
82		Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University (talk)						Expand
55		Eastern Institute for Integrated Learning in Management University (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
51		Sharda University (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
55		Sanjiv Bhatt (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
8		Henry Zvi Lothane (talk)						Merge
801		Administrative Assistant (talk)						Merge
62		Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (talk)						Merge
7		Delhi Public School, Durg (talk)						Wikify
130		India News (talk)						Wikify
497		Bhagyashree Patwardhan (talk)						Wikify
41		St. Mary's College of Engineering and Technology (talk)						Orphan
3		Fei Dawei (talk)						Orphan
6		Maharaja Agrasen College of Engineering and Technology (talk)						Orphan
12		Lal Bahadur Shastry College of Engineering Kasargod (talk)						Stub
15		University of Kota (talk)						Stub
7		Ram Lal Anand College (talk)						Stub
6		Dr. Navalar Nedunchezhiyan College of Engineering (talk)						Stub
10		INS Rahav (talk)						Stub
1		W. Randolph Hodges (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Re:Samanadhikaranya

I thank you for pointing out my mistake. I had forgotten that I had filled-up this blank earlier. I have since expanded and re-cast this page using the material contained in the article Samanadhikaranyam rightly declined by you today. Regards.Aditya soni (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

@Aditya soni: As I guess you mean Samanadhikaranyam, it is requested that please provide the valid links if in case I am wrong. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 14:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I have also copied the some content of the draft to the mainspace article since it lacked the main part of a article.— CutestPenguin^Hangout 17:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

The wonderful annual meeting! And more!

Hello, fellow Wikipedian!

I am excited to announce our upcoming Annual Meeting at the National Archives! We'll have free lunch, an introduction by Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, and a discussion featuring Ed Summers, the creator of CongressEdits. Join your fellow DC-area Wikipedians on Saturday, October 18 from 12 to 4:30 PM. RSVP today!

Also coming up we have the Human Origins edit-a-thon on October 17 and the WikiSalon on October 22. Hope to see you at our upcoming events!

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2014)

Seasoned and chargrilled lamb fillet steak Hello, Cutest Penguin. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Steak Previous selections: International airport • Ancient Roman architecture Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC) •

Chandramukhi

Hi, Cutest Penguin. I have submitted the article Chandramukhi to the WP:GOCE/REQ for requesting a copyedit. I was hoping that you would be interested in taking it up for a c/e. If not, can you suggest anyone who might be interested in it. Humbly requesting you on this context. Thanking you . Ssven2 (talk)

Tech News: 2014-41

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• You can use the phab: and phabricator: interwikis to link to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org. [1] [2]
• Some wikis have a template to track bugs in Bugzilla. You should update it to work with Phabricator. You can look at the one on mediawiki.org to see how. [3] [4]
• You can look at Special:MediaStatistics to see what kind of files are on your wiki. [5]
• A new tool can now create thumbnails of large TIFF images. This concerns files larger than 50 megapixels. These thumbnails are also sharpened. You can comment on Commons. [6]
• The Media Viewer tool has a clearer link to the file page. It also has buttons to download, share and embed the file. You can enlarge images by clicking on them. [7]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf2) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since 2 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from 7 October, and on all Wikipedias from 9 October (calendar).
• If you make a code mistake when editing a Lua script, you won't be able to save your edit. [8] [9]
• We fixed some more Internet Explorer bugs. If you use Internet Explorer 10, you will be able to use VisualEditor next week. Support for earlier versions is coming next. [10]
• On Thursday, the tool to edit TemplateData will come to 30 more wikis. [11] [12]
• You can help sort bugs in the Book and PDF export tool on October 8. [13]
• 1% of logged-out readers are getting pages from servers that run the HHVM tool. HHVM should make pages load faster. [14]

Future changes

• You can look at the plan of the Mobile team for their future work. [15]
• More changes to Media Viewer are coming. It will be easier to disable it, and you will see the caption below the image. [16] [17]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

06:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Request on 08:55:04, 6 October 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Onenessall

• Onenessall (talk · contribs)
  • User:Onenessall (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Onenessall (talk) 08:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello Cutest Penguin! Thank you for your review of Sri Ramakant Maharaj. I wonder if you can offer some guidance, please? Re: third-party sources, these are difficult to locate - because although this Master has belonged to the Inchegiri Navnath Sampradaya Lineage since 1962, and has been teaching for the last decade - he has only come into focus in the West in the last two years. Re: notability, he is the only direct disciple of Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj who is initiating others into this lineage, but again, this is difficult to source. (As an aside, I have been a serious student of Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj for decades. Having kept my ears open over the years, for a living Master from the same lineage, Sri Ramakant Maharaj only came into my view in the last year.)Word of this rare living Master, Sri Ramakant Maharaj is slowly but surely spreading across the world.

Having looked at Wiki's guidelines re verifiability of articles etc, I see that there are maybe some options that could apply to this article: ie notifications that inform there is a lack of "neutral" sources: eg use of templates such as "third-party", or "Unreferenced" or "Citations needed"... Your help would be very much appreciated as to how to move forward with this article. Thanks Onenessall (talk) 08:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

@Onenessall: Your draft only consist of self-published sources which is generally not considered to be the reliable source^{see link} in order to establish notability^{see link} you need to find reliable sources^{see link} for example articles published in the newspaper and that has to be online too so that it can be verified^{see link}. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 09:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

09:46:25, 6 October 2014 review of submission by NapaBrenda

• NapaBrenda (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nichelini Family Winery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello - Thank you for the prompt review, but I need further guidance as to why my sources do not prove notability. I have in my references 7 different newspaper articles about the subject from 3 separate newspapers, as well as 2 published books covering the subject, 3 other primary sources and the listing on the National Register of Historic Places. As I state in my article, this winery is the oldest winery in the Napa Valley (America's primary wine-growing region), and that fact alone seems to make it notable. Let me know what else you would like in terms of references - I have dozens of books on my shelf about this subject! Thank you -

NapaBrenda (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

@NapaBrenda: The references has to be published online so that it can be verified where in your draft I cannot see any such sources. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 10:00, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

• No, references do not need to be published online to be considered reliable. Books and newspapers that are only available in print are valid references. As well, there is no requirement that references be in English. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
• @NapaBrenda: @Cutest Penguin: This page may be helpful: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @Eastmain: What you are talking about? I think AfC decline reason have sufficient information to guide the editor about finding the sources and please don't use {{ping}} while mentioning about me on my talkpage. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 12:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

01:03:37, 7 October 2014 review of submission by NapaBrenda

• NapaBrenda (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nichelini Family Winery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Cutest Penguin: So, it seems my sources do not need to be accessible online - see in the rules under Verifiability/Accessibility: "Some reliable sources may not be easily accessible. For example, an online source may require payment, and a print source may be available only in university libraries or other offline places. Do not reject sources just because they are hard or costly to access." As I am writing about a historical subject, many of my sources are from very old books and articles that you can probably only find in libraries. That being said, several of my sources ARE available online, and I will provide links. I will also add some other online sources. Hopefully this will then meet the standard!

NapaBrenda (talk) 01:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

@NapaBrenda: There is no need of using such paid references, please see WP:RS to know how you can identify reliable sources and can support your draft/article. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 12:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

14:09:37, 7 October 2014 review of submission by Lwill74

• Lwill74 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dexter Allen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Lwill74 (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I wanted to see if I can get some help on improving my article. I asked the musician I wrote about and his assistant to help me get more references, but is there anything else I need to do? Thanks! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dexter_Allen

Hey Hi! @Lwill74:, as I can see you have added only 3 references which is not sufficient to meet the notability guidelines, and even the #1 and #3 references is not seems to be reliable source. Unfortunately I won't be able to help you out in finding the references since I am not aware about that subject all I can suggest that you should see WP:RS which will be helpful in finding and identify the reliable sources. Cheers! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 14:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of extinct mammals

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of extinct mammals. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

BLP Issue

Hi Cutest_Penguin,

The controversies section has been removed from this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kailash_Vijayvargiya

The content was well sourced and was not a copyright violation as well. Moreover, the facts were not deduced or views of some people were not stated. The facts were stated. The editor who removed the section has stated that, "(per BLP policy and accompanying discretionary sanctions, the controversies section is not to be added back to the article until additional balanced, neutral information has been added)". I have gone through Biographies of living persons but could not find the reason for removal. I request you to kindly educate me on this issue. Katyaan (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello! @Katyaan:, On English Wikipedia such articles is governed as per Biographies of living persons (BPL), by adding (per BLP policy and accompanying discretionary sanctions, the controversies section is not to be added back to the article until additional balanced, neutral information has been added) @Nick: wanted to say that controversy or criticism sections shouldn't form the majority of content in any given article, nor should articles focus solely on criticism. The overall content of that article was consist of criticism and controversies in majority where other vital information lacked or you can say was in minority which is not appreciated as per BLP policy. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 12:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

@Cutest Penguin: I see. So, if the page is developed via additional balanced content, this section can be resurrected. Got it. Thanks. Katyaan (talk) 12:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Filtermist International

Please would you look at your review and consider whether you have given the correct reason for declining the draft, and also whether you might have left a comment to guide the author? Fiddle Faddle 17:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

@Timtrent:  Done. I think the decline reason has the sufficient information to tell the editor what need to be done in that case, as well as his/her recent contributed article Industrial Extraction needs to be reviews which is already under mainspace and may not be suitable for Wikipedia. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 17:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. The reason I asked is that the author left a question on the AFC Help desk, and, when I looked, I find I disagree with your assessment. Now, it's fine that we disagree, but I felt it was useful if I mentioned it and how I disagree. I see a somewhat promotional, ill referenced draft, not something that falls into any obvious WP:NOT compartment. I appreciate your subsequent comment there which tends to head towards my way of thinking. I'm by no means saying that I am correct, nor that you are incorrect. I just wanted you to know that we have differing approaches.

I do, very much, think AFC Comments are the single most helpful thing we can do for a new editor, and I thank you sincerely for adding yours to the review. Fiddle Faddle 19:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

05:16:44, 10 October 2014 review of submission by Nusaiba Tasnim

• Nusaiba Tasnim (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sayeed Abubakar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nusaiba Tasnim (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear Sir, I don't understand what are wrong information I have submitted on poet Sayeed Abubakar. Sayeed Abubakar is a renowned poet of Bangladesh. Can you help me in this regard please? Sincerely yours Nusaiba Tasnim

@Nusaiba Tasnim: The subject you are trying to publish under the mainspace is seems to be previously deleted as per Criteria for speedy deletion A7 which says An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, this is because your article lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to verify the information. It is requested that before re-submitting the draft for review only after adding reliable sources to establish notability. Another thing, always sign your post on talk pages by adding ~~~~ at the end of your comment. Cheers! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 11:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Using incorrect AFC labels

Hello CP, while I admire your prolificness in rating AFC articles, it seems that frequently I run across ones you've mislabeled, often in rather confusing ways. As just a few examples from this evening (and I've been noticing this for days):

• Draft:Sayeed Abubakar, you picked BLP vio, but this is no potentially defamatory content, and the text has not been removed as the pink box claims. I think "ILC", lack of inline cites, or "V", lack of reliable sources, would be far more appropriate.
• Draft:Kenizé Mourad, you indicated that it is in inappropriate article about a fictional character, but Mourad is a writer, not a character. So the appropriate option would be "BIO" and direct the originator to WP:Notability (writers).

Please do take care in choosing your Decline criteria, less it confused the originators as is the case with the Abubakar article, where the originator is confused as to what is defamatory, when instead he should be understanding that he needs more formal sources to establish Notability. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

@MatthewVanitas: Thanks for reviewing and letting me know about decline criteria. Well, FYI I have fixed in the case of 1st where it seems to be deleted 3 times under mainspace as per copyvio two times and once as per A7 (more recent). I use afch (rewrite) to review article and just chose the option 'NOT SUITABLE' which automatically added the comment and section Literary Career seems to be NOT SUITABLE as per WP:NOT. Cheers! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 10:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm, "not suitable" is more for things like directories, editorials, how-to, recipes, etc. A bio of a poet is certainly the sort of thing WP does, just maybe not this poet ("bio") or if it's not referenced properly ("v" or "ilc"). I just think it's confusing Abubaker originator to link to WP:NOT when poet bios in general are legit, just his draft isn't a proper poet bio yet. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

@MatthewVanitas: We have already discussed in depth about this matter on IRC and even I have fixed it as per your suggestions I have tried to inform or you can say that I tried to give some hints that how the editor can improve it. Cheers! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

20:15:06, 10 October 2014 review of submission by Paulinaperez82

• Paulinaperez82 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Skip Kelly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The article was declined because the reviewer said the material was about a fictional character. It is not about a fictional character, the article is about a real radio and television personality in the United States.

Paulinaperez82 (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)