Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur's Missing Pal: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:56, 9 July 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as copyvio. Kimchi.sg 17:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur's Missing Pal

WP:SPAM,WP:VER,WP:NOR Blatant Advertisment Ste4k 21:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete as per nom. ForestH2 | + | √+ | √ | √- | - 22:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It needs rewriting not deleting. Given time to grow this could become a big article. Let it grow. If in a few months it hasn't attracted the attention of editors, that might be the time to consider deleting it. SilkTork 16:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the whole page is a copyvio from the Lions Gate Films site anyway. Blanking the page and adding copyvio tag. --Aguerriero (talk) 19:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result of the debate was '''delete''' as copyvio. [[User talk:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi.sg]] 17:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 ===[[Arthur's Missing Pal]]===
 [[WP:SPAM]],[[WP:VER]],[[WP:NOR]] Blatant Advertisment [[User:Ste4k|Ste4k]] 21:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 5: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Keep''' - It needs rewriting not deleting. Given time to grow this could become a big article. Let it grow. If in a few months it hasn't attracted the attention of editors, that might be the time to consider deleting it. [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] 16:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''' - the whole page is a copyvio from the Lions Gate Films site anyway.  Blanking the page and adding copyvio tag. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 19:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>