Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Report (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Added my $1/50 |
m Dating comment by Bhumburg - "Added my $1/50" |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:There has been no improvement in the article since the beginning of this year. No one is working on it. NUKEANDPAVE. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] <small>Please {{[[Template:re|re]]}}</small> 17:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
:There has been no improvement in the article since the beginning of this year. No one is working on it. NUKEANDPAVE. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] <small>Please {{[[Template:re|re]]}}</small> 17:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
I'm against deleting the article. At the very least, people need to know this is a humor site, not a site for actual news. [[User:bhumburg|bhumburg]] |
I'm against deleting the article. At the very least, people need to know this is a humor site, not a site for actual news. [[User:bhumburg|bhumburg]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"> — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 15:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 15:24, 20 October 2014
- National Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Further, currently is just a list of headlines that got picked up by other news agencies thinking they were legit or that others debunked. Only one sentence about the actual website. Page content is not actually about page title. Sources on page do not discuss the website/company itself or its notability. I think National Report is likely notable enough to have its own article, but current article needs WP:NUKEANDPAVE EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 15:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Totally agree! Lets delete it!Yup69 (talk) 02:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC) Keep it. Many don't realize it is a satire page and the Wikipedia page for it is the best place to explain that.
I think it should be kept. The article can be improved, but not deleted. People wanting to know what kind of "newspaper" it is (i.e. not one to take seriously) should know that. So, no deletion, but a complete make-over. My opinion. Jerappelle (talk) 15:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- There has been no improvement in the article since the beginning of this year. No one is working on it. NUKEANDPAVE. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm against deleting the article. At the very least, people need to know this is a humor site, not a site for actual news. bhumburg — Preceding undated comment added 15:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)