Talk:Anti-Catalan sentiment: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:34, 20 October 2014

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalan-speaking countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history, languages, and cultures of Catalan-speaking countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Catalan-speaking countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesTemplate:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesCatalan-speaking countries
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Bias

This page is strongly biased by the writer's political orientation. The anti-catalanism is a very serious matter to many people living in and outside Spain and it deserves to be treated from a more impartial perspective.

I agree that the article content as such was too biased to the right. However the name anti-catalanism is too biased in favour of catalan nationalism. Anyone who is against positions held by catalanist parties can be unfairly deemed anticatalan according to this definition.

--Burgas00 10:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I have to disagree with myself there. Anticatalanism is definitely a political reality in Spain.--Burgas00 23:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point

What's the point of creating an article named "anti-catalanism" (and the redirection catalanophobia) and reducing it to anti-catalannationalism? It may be big or small or not event exist but writing an article about hatred towards everything catalan is not pandering to catalan nationalism.

An encyclopedia must deal with facts, and therefore all its entries must be based on objective facts, or on a balanced set of authoritative quotations. I agree that the whole entry should be removed. It amounts to political propaganda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polifemo (talk • contribs) 15:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto to both. added some tags. --MauritiusXXVII ^{(Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!)} 23:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

This article currently doen't respect the neutral point of view policy, lacks verifiability, and it's an original research. And "these policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles". Talking plain, this article is a real bullshit. We need delete it or rewrite it. I've erased the discrimination tag (senseless, if we cant verify the content). I'll try to search some reliable sources and rewrite it with a minimums. And we need another one about anti-espanyolisme (two sides of the same coin). --Owdki ^talk 17:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish biased

The Crticism section is the largest of the article, and it only reflects the ideas of C's and UPyD, two small political parties, one of them non-existing in Catalonia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.151.54.254 (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly find this article ridiculous from the academic point of view. No sources, citations. Pure political propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1D50:2:101:911D:67DE:E50F:82CE (talk) 10:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exemplification

I think that with this matter we could use the hundreds of examples given in the social media, like youtube, twitter and others. It may be not nice to show hatred, but if it is in the name of objectivity, we could use it. This reality shouldn't be denied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.77.230.16 (talk) 07:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Coronel Fenymore (talk) 20:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)== Neutrality ==[reply]

If you want to be absolutely neutral, do not write any articles.

Lack of Neutrality

I tagged the article as lacking of neutrality for the following reasons:

By saying Anti-Catalanism is the collective name given to various historical trends in Spain and in France that have been hostile to Catalan culture and traditions. In more recent times it can also refer to a reaction against Catalan nationalism or Catalan independentism it is taken an opinion as a fact. People against catalan independency or catalan nationalism are considered by this definition as haters of catalan culture, which is not true (for example, think of a catalan person who doesn't want independence). Only accepting the two extremes (independenstism versus anti-catalanism) is a serious lack of neutrality.

Also, España 2000 is a political party without any single deputy in the Spanish parliament, thus being a extremely small minority, and it does not belong to Wikipedia as a viewpoint (see WP:WEIGHT). Any reference to their opinions should be eliminated.

The Further reading section is completely useless. Free advertising.

In the overall, with such lack of good references and lack of (or partially selected) explanation, this article is more a tendentious political/opinion article rather than an encyclopedic article, and it may confuse non-biased people or people who don't know about the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.84.69.83 (talk) 23:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:33, 20 October 2014 edit 141.84.69.83 (talk) →Lack of Neutrality: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:34, 20 October 2014 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,783 edits m Signing comment by 141.84.69.83 - "→Lack of Neutrality: new section" Next edit →
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* The ''Further reading'' section is completely useless. Free advertising.		* The ''Further reading'' section is completely useless. Free advertising.

	* In the overall, with such lack of good references and lack of (or partially selected) explanation, this article is more a tendentious political/opinion article rather than an encyclopedic article, and it may confuse non-biased people or people who don't know about the topic.		* In the overall, with such lack of good references and lack of (or partially selected) explanation, this article is more a tendentious political/opinion article rather than an encyclopedic article, and it may confuse non-biased people or people who don't know about the topic. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/141.84.69.83\|141.84.69.83]] ([[User talk:141.84.69.83\|talk]]) 23:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->