Talk:First-hitting-time model: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Adding class & importance to statistics rating template |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This page needs a lot of work for both content and its exposition. An excellent reference is "A Guide to First Passage Processes" by Sidney Redner. [[User:Adamace123|Adamace123]] ([[User talk:Adamace123|talk]]) 16:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC) |
This page needs a lot of work for both content and its exposition. An excellent reference is "A Guide to First Passage Processes" by Sidney Redner. [[User:Adamace123|Adamace123]] ([[User talk:Adamace123|talk]]) 16:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
I think we should change the title to 'First passage time' or 'First passage process' [[Special:Contributions/149.171.172.161|149.171.172.161]] ([[User talk:149.171.172.161|talk]]) 05:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:42, 21 October 2014
Statistics Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
I don't think the equation for S(t) can be right? Doesn't seem to take into account the possibility that the process may move beyond xc then back again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.124.72 (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
This page needs a lot of work for both content and its exposition. An excellent reference is "A Guide to First Passage Processes" by Sidney Redner. Adamace123 (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
I think we should change the title to 'First passage time' or 'First passage process' 149.171.172.161 (talk) 05:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)