User talk:DrC.Humphreys: Difference between revisions
Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) m Talkback (User talk:Vanjagenije#Gekkos of Zimbabwe) (TW) |
→Geckos: r |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
[[''Lygodactylus'']], ''[[Lygodactylus]]''. |
[[''Lygodactylus'']], ''[[Lygodactylus]]''. |
||
If you use double square brackets to create a link to another Wikipedia article, what is inside the brackets must be exactly the name of that article, without any extra punctuation marks. I can see that this is confusing, when the name of the article is correctly italicised. [[User:Maproom|Maproom]] ([[User talk:Maproom|talk]]) 13:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
If you use double square brackets to create a link to another Wikipedia article, what is inside the brackets must be exactly the name of that article, without any extra punctuation marks. I can see that this is confusing, when the name of the article is correctly italicised. [[User:Maproom|Maproom]] ([[User talk:Maproom|talk]]) 13:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
:as the other users have indicated , the article you created that was deleted has been restored and moved to [[User:DrC.Humphreys/Gekkos of Zimbabwe]]. |
|||
:not much of the draft as it stands is appropriate for the encyclopedia. since we already have an article about geckos as a whole and individual species of geckos, you would need to demonstrate that your specific sub-article topic, "geckos endemic to Zimbabwe", [[WP:42|has been written about by reliable sources]]- so rather than repeating information about individual species- which are already covered in their individual articles- you would need to find sources talking about the Zimbabwe geckos '''as a group''' - what they share in common, what makes them unique, why the area has the number that they do, how the concentration compare to other gecko concentrations, human impact in Zimbabwe on these species etc. the bit about the stamp series is a start. |
|||
:Then you will need to document every claim by [[WP:REFB|using an inline citation]] to a [[WP:RS|reliably published source]] (because of the dynamic and open editing nature of Wikipedia, we need specific inline citations at the point in the article where the claim is made - it is not like a permanent paper book where you write a paragraph and place a footnote at the end and the content and the footnote are permanent. at any point some yahoo can come along and add something or change wording and readers and editors need to be able to quickly [[WP:V|verify]] whether a sources actually supports the content.) -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 12:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Talkback== |
==Talkback== |
Revision as of 12:07, 21 October 2014
Welcome!
Hello, DrC.Humphreys, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reptiles and Frogs of the Eastern Highlands may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Reptiles_and_Frogs_of_the_Eastern_Highlands&diff=prev&oldid=630364301 --CiaPan (talk) 11:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gekkos of Zimbabwe
Hello DrC.Humphreys,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gekkos of Zimbabwe for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Vanjagenjie Regarding the nomination for deletion The duplication you refer to is of GEKKO an ASIAN Genus of lizard.....my article is African Lizards of the Order. I am a zoologist, conservationist and a vet and I live (mostly) in Zimbabwe. The article now seems to be permanently lost and has been deleted by Alexf Thanks Clive
Talkback
Message added 11:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Vanjagenije (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Geckos
I have just had a quick look at your draft article User:DrC.Humphreys/Gekkos of Zimbabwe. I have no views on whether it could become an acceptable article. I am writing here only to point out why many of the links on the page do not work, and therefore appear in red. Observe the difference: ''Lygodactylus'', Lygodactylus. If you use double square brackets to create a link to another Wikipedia article, what is inside the brackets must be exactly the name of that article, without any extra punctuation marks. I can see that this is confusing, when the name of the article is correctly italicised. Maproom (talk) 13:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- as the other users have indicated , the article you created that was deleted has been restored and moved to User:DrC.Humphreys/Gekkos of Zimbabwe.
- not much of the draft as it stands is appropriate for the encyclopedia. since we already have an article about geckos as a whole and individual species of geckos, you would need to demonstrate that your specific sub-article topic, "geckos endemic to Zimbabwe", has been written about by reliable sources- so rather than repeating information about individual species- which are already covered in their individual articles- you would need to find sources talking about the Zimbabwe geckos as a group - what they share in common, what makes them unique, why the area has the number that they do, how the concentration compare to other gecko concentrations, human impact in Zimbabwe on these species etc. the bit about the stamp series is a start.
- Then you will need to document every claim by using an inline citation to a reliably published source (because of the dynamic and open editing nature of Wikipedia, we need specific inline citations at the point in the article where the claim is made - it is not like a permanent paper book where you write a paragraph and place a footnote at the end and the content and the footnote are permanent. at any point some yahoo can come along and add something or change wording and readers and editors need to be able to quickly verify whether a sources actually supports the content.) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.