Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 October 25: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
||
====[[:List of Windows Phone 8 devices]]==== |
|||
:{{DRV links|List of Windows Phone 8 devices|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Windows Phone 8 devices|article=}} |
|||
Result contradicts consensus set by [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Android devices]], and discussion did not contain enough viewpoints. A list of devices running a single operating system, no matter how many, is "an indiscriminate collection of items that can't ever aim for completeness". Wikipedia is not Consumer Reports. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 23:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
====[[File:PCAGlobalGenetic.gif]]==== |
====[[File:PCAGlobalGenetic.gif]]==== |
||
Revision as of 23:40, 25 October 2014
Result contradicts consensus set by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Android devices, and discussion did not contain enough viewpoints. A list of devices running a single operating system, no matter how many, is "an indiscriminate collection of items that can't ever aim for completeness". Wikipedia is not Consumer Reports. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright permission given by author. Deleted with no discussion. Peasant in Suit (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- The file wasn't uploaded on en wikipedia, but on wikipedia commons so admins here can't restore or see the image. As I've no idea what the permission said it's pretty difficult to tell. If it said "you can use this on wikipedia", then the deletion on Commons was fine, Commons only accepts free images i.e. those with broader licenses for everyone to use including for commercial purposes. En wikipedia has a similar policy, though in some circumstances fair use claims can be made. --86.2.216.5 (talk) 15:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Close I agree with 86. The file was speedy deleted on Commons as "copyright violation". To request its undeletion on Commons go to commons:COM:UR. Thincat (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like the nominator has been blocked as a sock - [1] --86.2.216.5 (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)