Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 October 25: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dennis Brown (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*'''Close''' I agree with 86. The file was speedy deleted on Commons as "copyright violation". To request its undeletion on Commons go to [[commons:COM:UR]]. [[User:Thincat|Thincat]] ([[User talk:Thincat|talk]]) 18:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Close''' I agree with 86. The file was speedy deleted on Commons as "copyright violation". To request its undeletion on Commons go to [[commons:COM:UR]]. [[User:Thincat|Thincat]] ([[User talk:Thincat|talk]]) 18:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
* Looks like the nominator has been blocked as a sock - [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:Peasant_in_Suit] --[[Special:Contributions/86.2.216.5|86.2.216.5]] ([[User talk:86.2.216.5|talk]]) 19:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
* Looks like the nominator has been blocked as a sock - [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:Peasant_in_Suit] --[[Special:Contributions/86.2.216.5|86.2.216.5]] ([[User talk:86.2.216.5|talk]]) 19:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
* '''Close as wrong forum''' The file was deleted by [[User:INeverCry]] on Commons. If the uploader disputes the deletion, the dispute should take place on Commons instead. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 00:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:09, 26 October 2014
Result contradicts consensus set by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Android devices, and discussion did not contain enough viewpoints. Recommend a relisting with wider opinions from those involved with articles for other operating systems. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- As closing admin, I will just say the consensus was unquestionably to keep and I endorse my own close. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Android devices doesn't matter. It isn't the same kind of article in any way, and we don't use precedence like courts do here. Even though it was the nom, that comparison wasn't considered in the tally, per WP:WAX. Dennis - 2¢ 23:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright permission given by author. Deleted with no discussion. Peasant in Suit (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- The file wasn't uploaded on en wikipedia, but on wikipedia commons so admins here can't restore or see the image. As I've no idea what the permission said it's pretty difficult to tell. If it said "you can use this on wikipedia", then the deletion on Commons was fine, Commons only accepts free images i.e. those with broader licenses for everyone to use including for commercial purposes. En wikipedia has a similar policy, though in some circumstances fair use claims can be made. --86.2.216.5 (talk) 15:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Close I agree with 86. The file was speedy deleted on Commons as "copyright violation". To request its undeletion on Commons go to commons:COM:UR. Thincat (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like the nominator has been blocked as a sock - [1] --86.2.216.5 (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Close as wrong forum The file was deleted by User:INeverCry on Commons. If the uploader disputes the deletion, the dispute should take place on Commons instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)