Bank examiner: Difference between revisions
m Robot - Speedily moving category Accountancy to Category:Accounting per CFDS. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
you got an orange penut, yea, an orange penut, yea, for me, wow I I guess I accept you |
|||
A '''bank examiner''' is a financial professional, a species of [[auditor]], who has the task of making sure that [[bank]]s, [[savings and loan]]s, [[credit union]]s and similar financial institutions, and their branches, are operating legally and ethically, in accordance with the standards imposed on these institutions by the [[charter]]ing level of government. In the United States, they may work for state governments, for a [[United States government]] agency, or for the [[Federal Reserve Bank]]; or may be employed by the institutions themselves as [[internal auditor]]s. |
|||
Bank examiners act to monitor, assess and evaluate the compliance of institutions with relevant regulations and laws, including the institution's own stated policies and procedures. They evaluate the condition of [[recordkeeping]], compliance with [[data acquisition|data entry]] and [[Financial transaction|transaction]] regulations, and on the staff's ability to understand and follow relevant [[Standard Operating Procedure|protocols]]. The bank examination process may include personal inspection of the facility and its physical records, as well as computer access to [[electronic records]]. Bank examiners usually work on-site, traveling to various institutions and branches as scheduled or as requested, although some work may also be done through remote access. The bank examiner is expected to be knowledgeable of [[Finance|financial management]] and [[accounting]] principles (particularly [[forensic accounting]], as well as the relevant banking procedures and protocols. In most cases, an examiner will have worked in [[management]] positions in such facilities. |
Bank examiners act to monitor, assess and evaluate the compliance of institutions with relevant regulations and laws, including the institution's own stated policies and procedures. They evaluate the condition of [[recordkeeping]], compliance with [[data acquisition|data entry]] and [[Financial transaction|transaction]] regulations, and on the staff's ability to understand and follow relevant [[Standard Operating Procedure|protocols]]. The bank examination process may include personal inspection of the facility and its physical records, as well as computer access to [[electronic records]]. Bank examiners usually work on-site, traveling to various institutions and branches as scheduled or as requested, although some work may also be done through remote access. The bank examiner is expected to be knowledgeable of [[Finance|financial management]] and [[accounting]] principles (particularly [[forensic accounting]], as well as the relevant banking procedures and protocols. In most cases, an examiner will have worked in [[management]] positions in such facilities. |
Revision as of 16:10, 28 October 2014
you got an orange penut, yea, an orange penut, yea, for me, wow I I guess I accept you
Bank examiners act to monitor, assess and evaluate the compliance of institutions with relevant regulations and laws, including the institution's own stated policies and procedures. They evaluate the condition of recordkeeping, compliance with data entry and transaction regulations, and on the staff's ability to understand and follow relevant protocols. The bank examination process may include personal inspection of the facility and its physical records, as well as computer access to electronic records. Bank examiners usually work on-site, traveling to various institutions and branches as scheduled or as requested, although some work may also be done through remote access. The bank examiner is expected to be knowledgeable of financial management and accounting principles (particularly forensic accounting, as well as the relevant banking procedures and protocols. In most cases, an examiner will have worked in management positions in such facilities.
Bank examiners may report findings to their agency, and possibly to the board of directors or upper management of the institution. They are expected to provide analysis and evidence to substantiate their findings, in an objective and non-judgmental manner; and in particular to draw any serious violations of regulations to the appropriate levels of authority.
References