User talk:K7L/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SIP address, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages UDP and Firewall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Respect national varieties of English

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Chris the speller ^yack 18:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

The text which you have been changing in multiple articles was originally submitted in English. You are changing it repeatedly to American, or even going as far as to claim that valid English spellings (such as "centre") are part of the French language. Your edits are therefore violating WP:RETAIN and are disruptive. Please cease and desist, unless the topic is blatantly US-centric (such as U.S. Route 66 or the US Highway system) to the point where there's some reason to use American instead of proper English. K7L (talk) 18:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I never claimed that 'centre' is part of the French language. According to you, there are two varieties of English, huh, American English and "proper" English? Now I see why the other editors find it difficult to have constructive discussions with you. I won't try. And you would be wise to refrain from contribution-stalking. Chris the speller ^yack 19:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Party line (telephony) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• //news.google.com/newspapers?id=jRkqAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ESgEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6310,5038221 Party line protected], The Milwaukee Journal, Jun 18, 1968</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Area code 600 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Number portability

Toll-free telephone number (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Number portability

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Area codes 416, 647 and 437 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bethesda, Ontario

Area codes 819 and 873 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Saint-Celestin, Quebec

Automatic number identification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Plant test number

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Area codes 212 and 646, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long distance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CBM

Pan Am Railways (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CBM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

unexplained edits

Hi, you have made unexplained revert[1] of those two edits #1 and #2. Such behavior is disruptive please explain it on talk, thanks. --84.111.101.105 (talk) 07:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive edit

Hi, in your recent edit [2] stating that "If this is under NYT editorial control it should be WP:RS" You have reverted:

1. [3] where i added rs tag and publication details.
2. [4] where I removed information not in sources (stated as [while...] which run the risk of being WP:SYN ) and used the clarification as described in source.

As such your edit summary is misleading and doesn't cover you removals. Please reinstate the missing information. --84.111.101.105 (talk) 08:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

I haven't removed anything other than your bizarre misuse of {{rs}} to say the New York Times editorial is not a reliable source. You are the one who keeps removing things, mostly on pretexts like claiming to be copy-editing or combining something. K7L (talk) 17:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to U-Drop Inn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• storm]]; the damaged elements were replaced by [[light emitting diode|LEDs]] in February 2014.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ron Warnick |title=U-Drop Inn neon lights are back on - in LED |publisher=Route
• |publisher=Route 66 News |url=http://route66news.com/2014/02/12/u-drop-inn-neon-lights-back-led/ ]}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blonde joke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Redhead, Clumsiness and Cluelessness

Lawyer joke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scorn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Railway Museum of Eastern Ontario may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• fight to keep rail stations from going the way of the steam train], Ottawa Citizen, Dec 10, 1984]</ref> as railways are federally regulated, locally-opposed demolitions of historic stations in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

I thought I'd already fixed that? K7L (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Smiths Falls may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] line extending westward via Napanee-Deseronto<ref>http://rmeo.org/hist_proj/?page_id=728</ref>). By 1887, the CPR had extended its Toronto-Smiths Falls mainline to reach [[Montréal]]; in 1924,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bay of Quinte Railway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Salmon River, Trent River and Short line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Dihydrogen monoxide hoax

Your recent editing history at Dihydrogen monoxide hoax shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Follow BRD. -- Brangifer (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your deletion of ten kilobytes of validly-sourced content unrelated to the point in dispute is disruption of Wikipedia to make a WP:POINT and is vandalism. You have been warned. You continued. I've therefore taken the matter to AIV. Do not vandalise articles to try to make a point again. K7L (talk) 02:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Everyone has rejected your bad faith interpretation of events, as well as your little disruptive and subversive temper tantrum edit war after you lost your attempt to change the title. Get over it, and don't try to disrupt the redirect again or disrupt the article again. -- Brangifer (talk) 06:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Your edits are problematic. Take a look at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Statement by Neuraxis, "User:BullRangifer has twice deleted my comment for a clarifiation request and is now alleging I am edit warring over it!". Evidently I am not the only one encountering problems with inappropriate removal of content on your part. Don't assume that, just because you've been here for a while and made valid contributions in the past, that you have a "get out of jail free card" if you continue to disrupt Wikipedia in the future - whether it's pushing your agenda that all chiropractors are quacks or merely deleting valid, sourced content from articles to prove a point, eventually these antics begin to wear very thin. K7L (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

My removal of a misplaced comment and advice to place it in the proper place was the "100% correct" thing to do. That Neuraxis complained and ignored my edit summary was also wrong, and you are making the same mistakes that he makes.

Face it:

1. You lost your attempt to change the title of the article. Consensus was against you. Being a sore loser,
2. you then ignored that consensus and tried to sneakily edit your version in place, but were reverted.
3. I caught you and deleted your attempts, then
4. you filed a dubious complaint at AIV and that too was rejected (Edit summary: "notvand".
5. You don't seem to know what a POINT violation is, yet you keep using that term.
6. There is no evidence of any vandalism on my part.
7. You then used a sockpuppet in an attempt to misuse the redirect to create the article as you'd like it.
8. No one agrees with you.
9. All this demonstrates massive incompetence.
10. It also demonstrates tendentious and battlefield behavior.
11. BTW. I don't think all chiropractors are quacks. I have no idea where you got that idea.
12. It's your numerous antics which are wearing thin, not mine.

Find other, less contentious, areas to edit. You should be blocked. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm MrBill3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Functional medicine seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Seek consensus before making substantial changes to a controversial article. Your edits do not reflect NPOV or MEDRS. MrBill3 (talk) 04:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Apologies

I'm sorry about accidentally leaving two wikilinks. While composing my own comment, I wanted to easily check the history of those links (which link to Properties of water), but I forgot to remove the wikilinks when I finally submitted my comment. No offense intended. -- Brangifer (talk) 04:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Functional medicine has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do.

• Revision as of 00:02, 16 June 2014 combine duplicate ref tags, don't list citations as "ibid" as that breaks when subsequent edits change the text

The above edit summary does not accurately reflect the substantial addition of content that edit involved. MrBill3 (talk) 07:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The substantial addition of content was made back here by another editor; I was trying to clean up that edit's duplicate references, unmatched brackets and make clear claims made were from proponents and not from neutral sources. I am not the original author and have no horse in this race. K7L (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eskimo Pie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tropicana and Trix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Channel 75, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMPS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhinoceros Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Turner (politician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Stop

Please "cease and desist". Valid talk needs to be on the article talk page, not a redirect page, perhaps you have not understood that. Article talk should not be spread out over multiple locations. My talk page is my talk page, do not undo my edits, it is my prerogative to delete what I please on my talk page. See: WP:OWNTALK. Please familiarize yourself with what is civil behavior, and what constitutes vandalism, before making accusations, as none of my actions have been disruptive. If you feel that my actions are "detrimental" to the integrity of "Wikipedia", then instead of edit warring like you have done, and creating broken discussion treads for an article, please feel free to take it up with an administrator, and I will gladly accept any sanctions imposed by their enlightened judgement.--Notwillywanka (talk) 04:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

No, the user talk page warnings are kept in the page history - that's the only reason why policy condones hiding them from the current version. By moving your entire talk page to a /delete subpage, you are attempting to hide them not only from the current version of the page but also from the article history. That is not acceptable. Furthermore, Talk:Collège de Jonquière is a perfectly valid talk page. Only you are demanding that it be redirected, and as such your removal of valid comments by other editors is vandalism. Do this again and I will report it. K7L (talk) 04:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Please report me immediately if you feel that way. Otherwise leave things the way they should be.--Notwillywanka (talk) 04:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Reported. Please do not vandalise Wikipedia again to make a WP:POINT. K7L (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

66 Motel

I have to admit my January 2 edit on 66 Motel (Needles) is poorly planned, as I found out I had removed the hotel's founding date and relevent back-history.

I still think the content in the article has to be changed, but not in a large scale. Couldn't details of I-40's construction through town just be in the "Decline" section? TheGGoose (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll move the Red Rock Bridge information to the Topock, Arizona article. TheGGoose (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

The bridges might be a valid article topic in their own right. Trails Arch Bridge is on the US National Register of Historic Places, was given a WP article on July 2013 at Old Trails Bridge and is notable independently of Carty's Camp or the later Needles motel. The Red Rock Bridge is the direct successor to the Old Trails arch bridge, so the info should be moved there instead of to the city in Arizona. K7L (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Okay, whatever works, but I won't move the details between the articles. TheGGoose (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: NotWillyWonka

In regards to your comments at RFPP, please note that it's generally discouraged to throw out claims of sockpuppetry. I would strongly suggest that you either file a request at WP:SPI or retract your statement. As for the user page, users are allowed to remove warnings from their page and they shouldn't be restored. If there are continued actions related to the warning (e.g. user vandalizes, removes warning, then resumes vandalizing), then you can escalate it through the proper venues. Since the user has request that you stop restoring the edits, please note that further restorations can be considered disruptive editing. Mike V • Talk 05:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

The user had been moving the entire talk page (with the warnings in the history) to a subpage and nominating that subpage (invalidly) for speedy deletion. An administrator, as part of a rename of an inappropriate user name containing "willy" and "wank", attempted to piece the history back together and created a new user talk page under NotWillyWonka with a proper {{archive}}. The user appears to be trying to make that history go away by using two accounts. I appreciate your concern and have opened a WP:SPI investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NotWillyWonka. There's a huge difference between merely archiving warnings (which is permitted) vs. aggressively hiding them as this user has done, while continuing to edit disruptively. K7L (talk) 13:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

There were indeed some problems with this user, but they have been solved. They now have a new username which they are using. Your SPI is seriously malformed. The only problem I can see is that they don't leave a link to the archive on their talk page. That should be fixed. There has been no attempt to delete the archive. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

They're using both a new username and the renamed old username in parallel, so that is two simultaneous accounts. One or the other should be abandoned. K7L (talk) 15:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

The renamed username (NotWillyWonka) is proper to use. If NoGoodOnesLeft is a sockpuppet, that wouldn't be good, but you need to provide evidence. Not everyone who opposes you on one article (and in this case is siding with you on another) is a sockpuppet. -- Brangifer (talk) 16:00, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toll-free telephone numbers in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N11. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)