User talk:Dodo bird: Difference between revisions
→Ramifications: many things like that are happening |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Ramifications == |
== Ramifications == |
||
that you may not [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coat of Many Colours/Archive |understand]] at all. Might want to read [[User talk:Sagaciousphil#Weird activity on dog articles.|this too]]. And calling [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dogs&diff=634626033&oldid=634600806|people fucking as-hole] - considering the tone of that discussion, even if you misunderstood it, it is over the top. I sincerely hope you don't use this kind of language to often because it is not very constructive. Don't do that again, it is blockable. [[User:Hafspajen|Hafspajen]] ([[User talk:Hafspajen|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC) |
that you may not [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coat of Many Colours/Archive |understand]] at all. Might want to read [[User talk:Sagaciousphil#Weird activity on dog articles.|this too]]. And calling [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dogs&diff=634626033&oldid=634600806|people fucking as-hole] - considering the tone of that discussion, even if you misunderstood it, it is over the top. Even if there were NO other things behind this but solely he very conversation - still there was no reason to react like that, it is just never a reason to jump into a discussion calling fucking ashole somebody you don't even know. I sincerely hope you don't use this kind of language to often because it is not very constructive. Don't do that again, it is blockable. [[User:Hafspajen|Hafspajen]] ([[User talk:Hafspajen|talk]]) 05:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:17, 24 November 2014
archive |
Removal of duck image
Hi. I agree with your removal of the duck image on Poultry farming, but I think we need some images of poultry other than chickens - do you have any ideas?__DrChrissy (talk) 02:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Here's some I found on Commons.--Dodo bird (talk) 03:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
-
Turkeys on pasture at an organic farm
-
Breeding geese in France
-
Farm geese, Poland
-
Farm geese, Poland
-
Farm geese, Poland
-
Toulouse geese for foie gras
English Shepherd reverts
Hello, I reverted the edits to English Shepherd and Talk:English Shepherd because they were made by Kumioko, a banned user, in violation of his ban. But it looks like you and another IP user have taken responsibility for them by reverting my edits so I won't touch them again. Graham87 07:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of Summary
Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#.22Summary_Tables.22_for_Fatal_Dog_Attacks_article conversation is not over. I will wait the appropriate amount of for you to respond substantively to my points there and redo this. It is not enough for disagreement to exist, it must be substantive and in line with the general consensus about rules, guidelines, correctness in matter of fact, and good rhetoric and reasoning. This is not what consensus means, not vote count. Chrisrus (talk) 02:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
RM notification
Since you have participated in at least one Requested Move or Move Review discussion, either as participant or closer, regarding the title of the article currently at Sarah Jane Brown, you are being notified that there is another discussion about that going on now, at Talk:Sarah Jane Brown#Requested move #10. We hope we can finally achieve consensus among all participating about which title best meets policy and guidelines, and is not too objectionable. --В²C ☎ 17:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Ramifications
that you may not understand at all. Might want to read this too. And calling fucking as-hole - considering the tone of that discussion, even if you misunderstood it, it is over the top. Even if there were NO other things behind this but solely he very conversation - still there was no reason to react like that, it is just never a reason to jump into a discussion calling fucking ashole somebody you don't even know. I sincerely hope you don't use this kind of language to often because it is not very constructive. Don't do that again, it is blockable. Hafspajen (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)