Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wo sukuu kai: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Kyodaiteeter (talk | contribs) |
Kyodaiteeter (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Wo sukuu kai}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Wo sukuu kai}}) |
||
Appears to be a collection of case studies lumped together as an essay to prove the existence of "wo sukuu kai" - a term apparently created by the author. This therefore constitutes [[WP:NOR|original research]]. [[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 13:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC) |
Appears to be a collection of case studies lumped together as an essay to prove the existence of "wo sukuu kai" - a term apparently created by the author. This therefore constitutes [[WP:NOR|original research]]. [[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 13:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
No, this is a Japanese term, not created by the author[[User:Kyodaiteeter|Kyodaiteeter]] ([[User talk:Kyodaiteeter|talk]]) 13:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC) |
<br>No, this is a Japanese term, not created by the author[[User:Kyodaiteeter|Kyodaiteeter]] ([[User talk:Kyodaiteeter|talk]]) 13:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:56, 4 December 2014
- Wo sukuu kai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a collection of case studies lumped together as an essay to prove the existence of "wo sukuu kai" - a term apparently created by the author. This therefore constitutes original research. DAJF (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
No, this is a Japanese term, not created by the authorKyodaiteeter (talk) 13:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)