Jump to content

Template:NBL Ladder 2010–11: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
tidy style
Line 13: Line 13:
|- style="background: #ccffcc;"
|- style="background: #ccffcc;"
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
| 1 ||align=left| [[New Zealand Breakers]]
| 1 || style="text-align:left;" | [[New Zealand Breakers]]
| 28 || 22 || 6 || 4-1 || W3 || 2,463 || 2,367 || 104.06% || 78.57%
| 28 || 22 || 6 || 4-1 || W3 || 2,463 || 2,367 || 104.06% || 78.57%
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
| 2 ||align=left| [[Townsville Crocodiles]]
| 2 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Townsville Crocodiles]]
| 28 || 17 || 11 || 3-2 || L1 || 2,225 || 2,163 || 102.87% || 60.71%
| 28 || 17 || 11 || 3-2 || L1 || 2,225 || 2,163 || 102.87% || 60.71%
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
| 3 ||align=left| [[Perth Wildcats]]
| 3 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Perth Wildcats]]
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 3-2 || L2 || 2,380 || 2,192 || 108.58% || 57.14%
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 3-2 || L2 || 2,380 || 2,192 || 108.58% || 57.14%
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc
| 4 ||align=left| [[Cairns Taipans]]
| 4 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Cairns Taipans]]
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 4-1 || W4 || 2,186 || 2,107 || 103.75% || 57.14%
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 4-1 || W4 || 2,186 || 2,107 || 103.75% || 57.14%
|- style="background: #ffcccc;"
|- style="background: #ffcccc;"
|- bgcolor=#ffcccc
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;"
| 5 ||align=left| [[Wollongong Hawks]]
| 5 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Wollongong Hawks]]
| 28 || 15 || 13 || 4-1 || W1 || 2,272 || 2,209 || 102.85% || 53.57%
| 28 || 15 || 13 || 4-1 || W1 || 2,272 || 2,209 || 102.85% || 53.57%
|- bgcolor=#ffcccc
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;"
| 6 ||align=left| [[Gold Coast Blaze]]
| 6 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Gold Coast Blaze]]
| 28 || 13 || 15 || 2-3 || W1 || 2,396 || 2,440 || 98.20% || 46.43%
| 28 || 13 || 15 || 2-3 || W1 || 2,396 || 2,440 || 98.20% || 46.43%
|- bgcolor=#ffcccc
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;"
| 7 ||align=left| [[Melbourne Tigers]]
| 7 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Melbourne Tigers]]
| 28 || 10 || 18 || 1-4 || L3 || 2,209 || 2,357 || 93.72% || 35.71%
| 28 || 10 || 18 || 1-4 || L3 || 2,209 || 2,357 || 93.72% || 35.71%
|- bgcolor=#ffcccc
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;"
| 8 ||align=left| [[Adelaide 36ers]]
| 8 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Adelaide 36ers]]
| 28 || 9 || 19 || 1-4 || L1 || 2,212 || 2,362 || 93.65% || 32.14%
| 28 || 9 || 19 || 1-4 || L1 || 2,212 || 2,362 || 93.65% || 32.14%
|- bgcolor=#ffcccc
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;"
| 9 ||align=left| [[Sydney Kings]]
| 9 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Sydney Kings]]
| 28 || 8 || 20 || 2-3 || L3 || 2,171 || 2,317 || 93.70% || 28.57%
| 28 || 8 || 20 || 2-3 || L3 || 2,171 || 2,317 || 93.70% || 28.57%
|}
|}

Revision as of 19:49, 13 December 2014

# Team Pld W L Last 5 Streak For Against % Win %
1 New Zealand Breakers 28 22 6 4-1 W3 2,463 2,367 104.06% 78.57%
2 Townsville Crocodiles 28 17 11 3-2 L1 2,225 2,163 102.87% 60.71%
3 Perth Wildcats 28 16 12 3-2 L2 2,380 2,192 108.58% 57.14%
4 Cairns Taipans 28 16 12 4-1 W4 2,186 2,107 103.75% 57.14%
5 Wollongong Hawks 28 15 13 4-1 W1 2,272 2,209 102.85% 53.57%
6 Gold Coast Blaze 28 13 15 2-3 W1 2,396 2,440 98.20% 46.43%
7 Melbourne Tigers 28 10 18 1-4 L3 2,209 2,357 93.72% 35.71%
8 Adelaide 36ers 28 9 19 1-4 L1 2,212 2,362 93.65% 32.14%
9 Sydney Kings 28 8 20 2-3 L3 2,171 2,317 93.70% 28.57%