Template:NBL Ladder 2010–11: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
tidy style |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|- style="background: #ccffcc;" |
|- style="background: #ccffcc;" |
||
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
||
| 1 || |
| 1 || style="text-align:left;" | [[New Zealand Breakers]] |
||
| 28 || 22 || 6 || 4-1 || W3 || 2,463 || 2,367 || 104.06% || 78.57% |
| 28 || 22 || 6 || 4-1 || W3 || 2,463 || 2,367 || 104.06% || 78.57% |
||
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
||
| 2 || |
| 2 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Townsville Crocodiles]] |
||
| 28 || 17 || 11 || 3-2 || L1 || 2,225 || 2,163 || 102.87% || 60.71% |
| 28 || 17 || 11 || 3-2 || L1 || 2,225 || 2,163 || 102.87% || 60.71% |
||
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
||
| 3 || |
| 3 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Perth Wildcats]] |
||
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 3-2 || L2 || 2,380 || 2,192 || 108.58% || 57.14% |
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 3-2 || L2 || 2,380 || 2,192 || 108.58% || 57.14% |
||
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
|- bgcolor= #ccffcc |
||
| 4 || |
| 4 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Cairns Taipans]] |
||
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 4-1 || W4 || 2,186 || 2,107 || 103.75% || 57.14% |
| 28 || 16 || 12 || 4-1 || W4 || 2,186 || 2,107 || 103.75% || 57.14% |
||
|- style="background: #ffcccc;" |
|- style="background: #ffcccc;" |
||
|- |
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;" |
||
| 5 || |
| 5 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Wollongong Hawks]] |
||
| 28 || 15 || 13 || 4-1 || W1 || 2,272 || 2,209 || 102.85% || 53.57% |
| 28 || 15 || 13 || 4-1 || W1 || 2,272 || 2,209 || 102.85% || 53.57% |
||
|- |
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;" |
||
| 6 || |
| 6 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Gold Coast Blaze]] |
||
| 28 || 13 || 15 || 2-3 || W1 || 2,396 || 2,440 || 98.20% || 46.43% |
| 28 || 13 || 15 || 2-3 || W1 || 2,396 || 2,440 || 98.20% || 46.43% |
||
|- |
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;" |
||
| 7 || |
| 7 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Melbourne Tigers]] |
||
| 28 || 10 || 18 || 1-4 || L3 || 2,209 || 2,357 || 93.72% || 35.71% |
| 28 || 10 || 18 || 1-4 || L3 || 2,209 || 2,357 || 93.72% || 35.71% |
||
|- |
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;" |
||
| 8 || |
| 8 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Adelaide 36ers]] |
||
| 28 || 9 || 19 || 1-4 || L1 || 2,212 || 2,362 || 93.65% || 32.14% |
| 28 || 9 || 19 || 1-4 || L1 || 2,212 || 2,362 || 93.65% || 32.14% |
||
|- |
|- style="background-color:#ffcccc;" |
||
| 9 || |
| 9 || style="text-align:left;" | [[Sydney Kings]] |
||
| 28 || 8 || 20 || 2-3 || L3 || 2,171 || 2,317 || 93.70% || 28.57% |
| 28 || 8 || 20 || 2-3 || L3 || 2,171 || 2,317 || 93.70% || 28.57% |
||
|} |
|} |
Revision as of 19:49, 13 December 2014
# | Team | Pld | W | L | Last 5 | Streak | For | Against | % | Win % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New Zealand Breakers | 28 | 22 | 6 | 4-1 | W3 | 2,463 | 2,367 | 104.06% | 78.57% |
2 | Townsville Crocodiles | 28 | 17 | 11 | 3-2 | L1 | 2,225 | 2,163 | 102.87% | 60.71% |
3 | Perth Wildcats | 28 | 16 | 12 | 3-2 | L2 | 2,380 | 2,192 | 108.58% | 57.14% |
4 | Cairns Taipans | 28 | 16 | 12 | 4-1 | W4 | 2,186 | 2,107 | 103.75% | 57.14% |
5 | Wollongong Hawks | 28 | 15 | 13 | 4-1 | W1 | 2,272 | 2,209 | 102.85% | 53.57% |
6 | Gold Coast Blaze | 28 | 13 | 15 | 2-3 | W1 | 2,396 | 2,440 | 98.20% | 46.43% |
7 | Melbourne Tigers | 28 | 10 | 18 | 1-4 | L3 | 2,209 | 2,357 | 93.72% | 35.71% |
8 | Adelaide 36ers | 28 | 9 | 19 | 1-4 | L1 | 2,212 | 2,362 | 93.65% | 32.14% |
9 | Sydney Kings | 28 | 8 | 20 | 2-3 | L3 | 2,171 | 2,317 | 93.70% | 28.57% |
Usage
This is a template that was created to easily update every article with the 2010–11 NBL Ladder. To use the update on any article, insert:
{{2010–11 NBL Ladder}}
To highlight the Sydney Kings, insert:
{{2010–11 NBL Ladder|team=SYD}}
For the other teams, use:
- Adelaide 36ers - ADE
- Cairns Taipans - CNS
- Gold Coast Blaze - GCB
- Melbourne Tigers - MEL
- New Zealand Breakers - NZB
- Perth Wildcats - PER
- Townsville Crocodiles - TSV
- Wollongong Hawks - WOL
</noinclude>