User talk:Corabal

Colin McRae

Until the coroner has confirmed that Colin McRae has died we cannot put that he has died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Pears (talk • contribs) 22:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Tense

Hi. I've reverted your change of tense because the programme still exists, even though it is no longer broadcast. The JPS^{talk to me} 14:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Super Mario Galaxy

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Sepmix! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 21:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jose Mourinho's Chelsea Career

A tag has been placed on Jose Mourinho's Chelsea Career, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g2.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 19:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Chris Senior

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Chris Senior meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Senior. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Mattythewhite 15:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Chris Senior

Hey. I placed the article up for deletion due to its failing of WP:BIO. This states "Competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming or tennis", which Senior fails, as the highest he has played is the Conference National, which is semi-professional. Thanks, Mattythewhite 21:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Peter Serafinowicz Show

A tag has been placed on The Peter Serafinowicz Show, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pig^man 02:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Randy Orton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KipSmithers ^T/C 00:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Not really, our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. KipSmithers ^T/C 00:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

HEy

Hey since I know you have interacted with the WWE Brand Extension article in the past, may you do me a favor and join this discussion about splitting the brand extension and drafts. click here--TrUcO9311 20:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Never Mind the Sources

Regarding your edit to List of Never Mind the Buzzcocks episodes – as you may see from looking over the rest of that article, NMB has never before had such an extensive run as you claim here, so we'll be needing citations for the idea that there will be more than the six previously confirmed. If you need any help with citing, just drop me a line (by hitting the second D ->) ^† DBD 03:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Good stuff – then find the publication, issue and page and cite it in the references ^† DBD 15:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Pity – 'fraid it can't be cited then... :( ^† DBD 16:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Jekyll has Ended

Series one of Jekyll has ended. As of yet, there are no plans for a second series. Thus the series has ended. By your definition (whatever that may be), how would we ever mark anything as having ended? It is completely possible, whether likely or not, that there will never be another series of Jekyll. If that were the case, by your deffinition, when would you mark the series as 'ended'? With regards to your comment on the Mighty Boosh, yes that too has ended. One series (regardless of number) has ended, and another is yet to be made, thus it has ended until further notice. With respect, I think you'll find that most of the community will agree with this definition, so please, before re-reverting, state a good, solid reason why Jekyll should not be seen as ended. _TheIslander 02:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

As a side note, in case you're unaware, please read up on WP:3RR. _TheIslander 21:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, whilst I'm thinking about it, it may be a good idea to go through WP:3O. That is, of course, unless you're willing to stop reverting and discuss this, either here, on my talk page, or on the article talk page (but not in edit summaries). If not, I'll file a request at WP:3O shortly. _TheIslander 21:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

MITB

Hmm, it seems like they have changed it since I added it as a source. It used to say "Eight superstars", and now it says "A collection of superstars". TJ Spyke 00:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Umaga/Batista

They have done the same thing many times in the past though, hyping up a RAW vs. SmackDown match (the main event of NWO 2007 for example). TJ Spyke 22:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Heather Mills

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your test is here. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 23:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't do that. You think she cares? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 23:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Your note

Hello Sepmix. Thank you for your note. I think that you and IMDb could well be right. Unfortunately, a few years ago IMDb fell out of favor here at wikiP for various reasons. I would say that you could keep looking on the net and if you find a reliable source with this title (interestingly there was a brief UK series starring Patrick Stewert with this name a few years ago - this was followed by a US series that wasn't as good) please feel free to put it back in. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 16:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi again. thanks for your followup note. No apologies necessary. Speculation around each new season of Doctor Who runs riot. Even though I am a Yank I have been following and enjoying the show since 1981 and each new season has always been eagerly anticipated by we fans. Keep enjoying both the show and editing here! MarnetteD | Talk 13:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Daleks and Cybermen in S5 Finale

I agree, it's common knowledge, but only due to unreliable sources and images that cannot be used as references. As the other editor said, we just don't want to set an example that other newbie editors will follow, or most articles will end up with unsourced facts typed in as invisitext lol. magnius (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to The Pandorica Opens, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Color Signatures

Hey, no problem. I personally found the process kind of confusing, and don't remember how I did it that well, so rather than tell you, I'll just point you in the direction of where I was reading when I did it before. Check out WP:SIGNATURE, down by the Customization/Color/Appearance sections. Hopefully that helps. Sergecross73 msg me 17:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Barri Griffiths appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 18:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Royal Rumble 2011

Indeed, which is why I didn't take it off. I simply moved it into a footnote that is directly linked with the # heading. Hope that helps. -- Θakster  21:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

No problem. -- Θakster  21:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Corabal. You have new messages at Evilgohan2's talk page.
Message added 23:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

June 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to A Good Man Goes to War. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ╟─TreasuryTag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 18:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ched Evans, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bronygarth. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kilopi (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Alien creature

I left you a link to the talk page and the exact section necessary. Please choose to read the edit summary before commenting that no edit summary was left. The creature at the end is not confirmed in any capacity to be a Xenomorph beyond observation, in which case it fails to meet any of the established life cycle or characteristics. Until someone involved with the production confirms or denies what it is, it certainly isn't a Xenomorph. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Indeed, but the creature had the same head and tongue as the traditional Xenomorph, and in the end credits it stated that some characters were credited to Dan O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett, the creators of the character, no other characters other than this were linked to them.

I'm not sure how they are the creator of the character, Giger designed it. From what I remeber, those two have some ridiculous deal where they get their name on related stuff even if they had nothing to do with it. I can't remember which article I read it in so at the moment my memory is uncited. They didn't get any credit on the poster which happens even for the guy who made the first Fast and the Furious so I can't say what their credit is. Maybe the Space Jockey, or even that the design of the alien is similar enough to the Xenomorph to justify a credit if they did create it. Maybe it's because they wrote hte first one so they get credit for anything universe related including Weyland. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bronygarth, you may be blocked from editing. I'll copy this warning for you since I assume the IPs starting with 67.5 are you logged out. Note that logging out to vandalize can result in sanctions against your main account. Kilopi (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kilopi (talk) 03:41, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

I wondered why I was getting this warning, I haven't touched the page in ages dude. :/ Sepmix (talk) 19:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

London Film and Comic Con (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to William Russell, John Bradley, Terry Richards and Thomas Dekker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Only Connect (series 6)

The article Only Connect (series 6) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV content. No independent refs. No claim of notability. No evidence of awards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Bronygarth

After a vandalism spree such as this which ended with this revert by me, WHY ON EARTH would you immediately make an edit with the edit summary, "Undid revision 532793382 by Racerx11"??!! I almost injured myself trying to not revert you. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 02:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Don't bother responding. These edits clearly indicate who and what you are. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 04:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

London Film and Comic Con (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kenny Baker, Hugh Walters, James Brogden, David Banks and Peter Mayhew

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Khan Noonien Singh. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McGeddon (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ellen Page, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Super (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to WrestleMania XXX, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Antoshi ☏ ★ 16:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WrestleMania XXX, you may be blocked from editing.
Do not remove legitimate sources. Maybe if you would've read the article I cited or perhaps listened to the video on it, you would hear the match was made official. Antoshi ☏ ★ 21:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Sue Townsend

Please stop indicating that Towsend has died if you can't provide a reliable source - thanks. --A bit iffy (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks for posting on my talk page. I've answered your question there at User talk:Quenhitran#Frozen/Spirited Away. Again, thank you. ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 10:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anna (Disney) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |voice = [[Kristen Bell]] in ''[[Frozen (2013 film)|Frozen]]''<br>Livvy Stubenrauch (as a child, speaking (''[[Frozen (2013 film)|Frozen]]'')<br>Katie Lopez (as a child, singing (''[[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm AldezD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Only Connect (series 10), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. [1] AldezD (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Re your message on my talk page, there's a link in the message above showing the edit you made to Only Connect (series 10) adding unsourced content. Here is the comparison again. AldezD (talk) 13:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of highest-grossing films in Japan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Frozen (2013 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)