Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Railsback: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:20, 2 January 2015

Alexis Railsback

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bit too much written in the will-be style, and no reliable sources presented. Maybe a case of too-soon. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is not a "too-soon" post. I have added legitimate References as well as Official Web links. Pageant news is slow in Kansas City and I will continue to add References as they become available. Alexis is my niece on my wife's side and I was present at the Miss Kansas USA pageant in Wichita, Kansas on 11/30/14 when she earned and was awarded her title as Miss Kansas USA 2015. Many of the photographs posted on the linked web sites were taken personally by me. Alexis is a full-time student and has contractual obligations to the Miss Kansas USA pageant so she is very busy. My niece will forward her Biography to me to post as soon as she has the time. I look forward to being present at the Miss USA 2015 pageant to support my beautiful and talented niece, Alexis Railsback. David Stoll ^{T C} 11:08, 20 December 2014 (CST)
- None of which show independent sourcing - and the official web links are inappropriate per WP:ELOFFICIAL (and have been removed a couple of times already). As I said on your talkpage, please study the relevant policies and guidelines provided (or ask). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep normally we find that state-level pageant winners of this magnitude have enough third party reliable sources to be kept. I see no reason to make an exception here. Information is verifiable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 19:51, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I expect she's a very nice person, but beauty pageant winners don't strike me as particularly notable. PatGallacher (talk) 19:53, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Paulmcdonald. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regan Hartley for some good "keep" arguments in a similar deletion discussion. Ejgreen77 (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:53, 27 December 2014 edit PatGallacher (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 49,435 edits →Alexis Railsback ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:20, 2 January 2015 edit undo Ejgreen77 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors 58,930 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	*'''Delete''' I expect she's a very nice person, but beauty pageant winners don't strike me as particularly notable. [[User:PatGallacher\|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher\|talk]]) 19:53, 27 December 2014 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' I expect she's a very nice person, but beauty pageant winners don't strike me as particularly notable. [[User:PatGallacher\|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher\|talk]]) 19:53, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

			*'''Keep''' per Paulmcdonald. See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regan Hartley]] for some good "keep" arguments in a similar deletion discussion. [[User:Ejgreen77\|Ejgreen77]] ([[User talk:Ejgreen77\|talk]]) 19:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)