User talk:Shark310

Talk:Nate Moore (actor)#Voluntary manslaughter case.

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Nate Moore (actor)#Voluntary manslaughter case.. Thanks.  —Josh3580_talk/hist 01:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Template:Z48

December 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nate Moore (actor). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dave Oren Ward. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 21:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

It appear that you are just as much at "war". This article does not need your inaccurate and irrelevant "facts". It's clear you have an agenda. The new edits you continually put in violate Wp policy. Why don't yiy stop editing and allow it to run its course? It appears that one can not have a "one sided war." If I am warring surely you are as well, scalhotrod... Shark310 (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Shark310 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The articles that were in AFD are now deleted and thus it is a moot Point. While I now know what sock puppetry is, I literally had never even heard of it before. After a user attempted to WP "OUT" me, and attempted to announce that my identity was a specific person by name, i had privacy concerns. I won't do it again.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The articles that were in AFD are now deleted and thus it is a moot Point. While I now know what sock puppetry is, I literally had never even heard of it before. After a user attempted to WP "OUT" me, and attempted to announce that my identity was a specific person by name, i had privacy concerns. I won't do it again. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The articles that were in AFD are now deleted and thus it is a moot Point. While I now know what sock puppetry is, I literally had never even heard of it before. After a user attempted to WP "OUT" me, and attempted to announce that my identity was a specific person by name, i had privacy concerns. I won't do it again. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The articles that were in AFD are now deleted and thus it is a moot Point. While I now know what sock puppetry is, I literally had never even heard of it before. After a user attempted to WP "OUT" me, and attempted to announce that my identity was a specific person by name, i had privacy concerns. I won't do it again. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}