Jump to content

Talk:Subsequent Nuremberg trials: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 212.247.167.113 (talk) to last version by Fayenatic london
Line 24: Line 24:
A guy named Chris asserts there being no doubt about the use of [[torture]] during these trials. What do [[historian|mainstream historians]] say about that? He also claims that 137 out of 139 examined men had their [[testes]] crushed. Supposing not everyone tortured had his testes crushed I find torture that widespread hard to stomach. Did the Americans decide in advance which ones to acquit? I see no sensible reason to think so.
A guy named Chris asserts there being no doubt about the use of [[torture]] during these trials. What do [[historian|mainstream historians]] say about that? He also claims that 137 out of 139 examined men had their [[testes]] crushed. Supposing not everyone tortured had his testes crushed I find torture that widespread hard to stomach. Did the Americans decide in advance which ones to acquit? I see no sensible reason to think so.


2012-08-01 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/213.114.151.180|213.114.151.180]] ([[User talk:213.114.151.180|talk]]) 18:54, 1 August 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
2012-08-01 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

Revision as of 15:20, 10 January 2015

Start class

Some expansion is needed to get to B class, plus some footnotes. But a great start. Aboutmovies 19:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of torture

There are accusations of the Nuremberg Military Tribunals using torture against the accused. Can anyone verify or debunk those accusations? While I can’t exclude the possibility of some of them being tortured I find widespread torture implausible. Please note that I don’t intend to read any “revisionist” literature. Some details of the Nazi genocide may well be legitimately revisioned. But their industrial killing of millions of defenceless people is so well-documented it is highly unlikely to be disproven.

A guy named Chris asserts there being no doubt about the use of torture during these trials. What do mainstream historians say about that? He also claims that 137 out of 139 examined men had their testes crushed. Supposing not everyone tortured had his testes crushed I find torture that widespread hard to stomach. Did the Americans decide in advance which ones to acquit? I see no sensible reason to think so.

2012-08-01 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.151.180 (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]