Talk:WWII in HD: Difference between revisions
m Tagging using AWB (10524) |
respond to one comment; add about development by watchers |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The section on Lt. Scheffel described him as "an amazing man and soldier." This appears to have been done by a family member or family friend. While I respect that opinion, it constitutes editorializing and is not neutral. [[Special:Contributions/108.202.62.77|108.202.62.77]] ([[User talk:108.202.62.77|talk]]) 08:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Alex |
The section on Lt. Scheffel described him as "an amazing man and soldier." This appears to have been done by a family member or family friend. While I respect that opinion, it constitutes editorializing and is not neutral. [[Special:Contributions/108.202.62.77|108.202.62.77]] ([[User talk:108.202.62.77|talk]]) 08:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Alex |
||
::Followup: the treatment of Charles Scheffel was revised sometime during last three years and there is no longer a problem that way. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
==GOCEreviewed== |
==GOCEreviewed== |
||
As well as dealing with the tags on the page, the empty sections should be completed before it's worth copy editing this. --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 17:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC) |
As well as dealing with the tags on the page, the empty sections should be completed before it's worth copy editing this. --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 17:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
==Development by watchers== |
|||
The series is available in [[Netflix]] currently (January 2015). Not sure if that can/should be noted in article. |
|||
To me, the article's topic is clearly notable, and the article is really pretty good. I removed several negative tags that seem not to apply (maybe the article was improved since 2010), and replaced just by one: {{tl|more footnotes}} (which calls for inline citations). Further development is not hugely needed, IMHO. |
|||
In general, can watchers of the TV series cite the series itself? The TV episodes themselves are sources, should be as legitimate as printed sources. Obviously they are primary sources of info about what the episodes contain, but primary sources can be used, with care, in Wikipedia. I think informed watchers/viewers should be able to generalize from the episodes themselves, though I am not sure how that is done in other articles. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:19, 21 January 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWII in HD article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Television Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Military history: War films / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 12 January 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Forum
It's impossible to watch the series online here in Israel!!! Absolutely outrageous.
Lt. Charles Scheffel
The section on Lt. Scheffel described him as "an amazing man and soldier." This appears to have been done by a family member or family friend. While I respect that opinion, it constitutes editorializing and is not neutral. 108.202.62.77 (talk) 08:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Alex
- Followup: the treatment of Charles Scheffel was revised sometime during last three years and there is no longer a problem that way. --doncram 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
GOCEreviewed
As well as dealing with the tags on the page, the empty sections should be completed before it's worth copy editing this. --Stfg (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Development by watchers
The series is available in Netflix currently (January 2015). Not sure if that can/should be noted in article.
To me, the article's topic is clearly notable, and the article is really pretty good. I removed several negative tags that seem not to apply (maybe the article was improved since 2010), and replaced just by one: {{more footnotes}} (which calls for inline citations). Further development is not hugely needed, IMHO.
In general, can watchers of the TV series cite the series itself? The TV episodes themselves are sources, should be as legitimate as printed sources. Obviously they are primary sources of info about what the episodes contain, but primary sources can be used, with care, in Wikipedia. I think informed watchers/viewers should be able to generalize from the episodes themselves, though I am not sure how that is done in other articles. --doncram 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class war films articles
- War films task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Articles reviewed by the Guild of Copy Editors