Talk:Satanic forces: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:22, 9 October 2004

Satanic forces

Offensive religious POV definition. I can't see how this could be expanded into an meaningful encyclopedia article. Delete. jni 16:28, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Delete. One sentence "article". Controversial. Offensive. --Jill St. Crux 17:34, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Delete. A wide, sweeping, offensive statement that is patently wrong. Average Earthman 18:28, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Satanism. No merge. — Gwalla | Talk 22:16, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Why didn't I think of that? Agreed with Gwalla, redirect. - RedWordSmith 23:28, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Satanism. Nadavspi 02:17, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Strongly disagree with a redirect to Satanism, which has nothing whatsoever to do with what this article wants to be about. Redirecting to Satanism would make as much sense as redirecting "Running dogs of imperialism" to Dogs. --jpgordon {gab} 03:02, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
How about a redirect to Satan?--Samuel J. Howard 03:16, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Do not redirect to Satanism. Redirecting to Satan seems reasonable. Gamaliel 03:22, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *'''Delete'''. Strongly disagree with a redirect to [[Satanism]], which has nothing whatsoever to do with what this article wants to be about. Redirecting to Satanism would make as much sense as redirecting "Running dogs of imperialism" to [[Dog]]s. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]] {[[User talk:Jpgordon|gab}]] 03:02, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 *How about a '''redirect to [[Satan]]?'''--[[User:Samuel J. Howard|Samuel J. Howard]] 03:16, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''.  Do not redirect to [[Satanism]].  Redirecting to [[Satan]] seems reasonable. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 03:22, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)