Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Booraz (talk | contribs)
17 edits
No edit summary
Line 516: Line 516:


::'''request''' I want to create this page wih a modified and non-promotional content. Please allow me to do that and if in case the content seems to be promotional then please do modify it. [[User talk: Rowmanwhite]] (UTC)
::'''request''' I want to create this page wih a modified and non-promotional content. Please allow me to do that and if in case the content seems to be promotional then please do modify it. [[User talk: Rowmanwhite]] (UTC)

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TSPĮ==

*{{revisions|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TSPĮ}}
<i></i>I, Booraz, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. [[User:Booraz|Booraz]] ([[User talk:Booraz|talk]]) 13:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:56, 30 January 2015

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

File:Union Internationale des Guides et Scouts d'Europe.svg

maybe should have been deleted from offspring articles, but should not have been deleted from parent article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Union_of_Guides_and_Scouts_of_Europe . And yes, I have seen the deletion discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review/Archive_58#File:Union_Internationale_des_Guides_et_Scouts_d.27Europe.svg . Limiting use to the parent article would have saved the image in the first place, instead of deleting it wholesale. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just got back from the hospital, many thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mitosis digital agency

This is a corporate company website information of digital advertising industry of malaysia -Ravindrakumar20102013 (talk) 19:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. We don't unilaterally restore G11 deletions here, either. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Center for Undergraduate Research in Mathematics

I, Dmcoff, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dmcoff (talk) 21:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete this article--I have new sources to use. Thank you. Dmcoff (talk) 21:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. This page was undeleted on 9 Jan, and has been edited since by you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
However, the draft article has now been deleted as a blatant copyright violation.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

tyler adkins

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Trooperstraw (talk) 06:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC) www.theadkinsfirm.com . It is clear based on the website and its content that nothing described was contrived or falsified. There is no reason why this worthy candidate should be deleted[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ZEEKtheFREAK

I, Zeek58, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zeek58 (talk) 08:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ZEEKtheFREAK

No reasoning given. -Zeek58 (talk) 08:17, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RTB2

I think I can add more citations, and was unfairly deleted. If restored, merge with Radio Television Brunei. -202.160.36.103 (talk) 10:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTB2, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I suggest you create a new draft for it and start with your new citations. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...why? RTB1 still remains, why not merge it? Or even userify the RTB2 page? 202.160.36.103 (talk) 11:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC) BTW, if you don't, I will be on break (for this account)[reply]

Because this page is solely for undeleting pages deleted uncontroversially. The presence of a deletion debate means there was controversy over it (And before you ask, admins will unilaterally overturn deletions based on no-participation AfDs, on the grounds that there was no debate, so it may as well have been PRODded). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy is possible. But you must request that. This article was a battle ground with much disruptive, and promotional editing, and reversals. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frosae Wine Sorbae

The page was not used for advertisement. I followed the same format as Ben and Jerry's and other dessert companies, so if those are acceptable then why isn't this one? -Chrissip (talk) 15:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You can't argue for undeletion based on the presence of articles in like topic areas. All articles on Wikipedia must independently satisfy our notability policies. If the article you are using as justification itself fails this, it will likely be nominated for deletion soon. G11s also won't unilaterally be restored here. One thing that people seem to always never realise is that G11 deletions are issues of tone as opposed to format or sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. @Chrissip: The article didn't resort to many promotional words or phrases, but it looked as a whole like a corporate brochure having the sole purpose of using Wikipedia for publicity purposes. That isn't permitted. If you disagree with the deletion decision, take it up with the deleting administrator Jimfbleak.
Also, if you are affiliated in any way with the company, you are required as by wmf:Terms of Use, to which you agreed when you created the account, to disclose your affiliation publicly. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dailypact

hi there i do not think that this page should be deleted i created the page as a founder of the website i created it so that people can find my site easily who are interested in creating blogposts. the page represents general information about the company and their is nothing spam with it and then click the "Save page" button below -Goodboysssszzz (talk) 23:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. If it does get deleted, admins will not restore G11 deletions here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, having a page solely so "that people can find [your] site easily" is advertising, which we do not permit. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done The page was deleted via A7 and G11, neither of which are things that can be restored through REFUND. You can ask the deleting admin if they'll restore the page and if they refuse you can then go through WP:DRV, but I'll openly say that I think it will be extremely unlikely that they will restore this article. I'm also concerned about notability, as it appears that this site just recently launched and as such, will be unlikely to have received enough coverage to pass notability guidelines for websites. If you think that it has, then you can try making a new version of the article at WP:AfC, the articles for creation process. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Multi Image Group

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Hueyoneil (talk) 05:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Finnegan

Kyle Finnegan is a current professional baseball player for the Oakland Athletics and is indeed a notable person, He has played in the prestigious Cape Cod Baseball League and is currently in the AA level for the Midland Rockhounds, a minor league affiliate of the Oakland Athletics {{Userspace draft|source=ArticleWizard|date=January 2015}}— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeschmoe1991 (talk • contribs)

@Joeschmoe1991: I have restored the article to User:Joeschmoe1991/Kyle Finnegan. Please work it it there, expanding the content and citing to reliable secondary sources that are independent of this person which verify that content you add and indicate notability. Please understand that this was not deleted on the basis of notability (an assessment of notability requires looking at whether topic is notable regardless of what's currently written in an article or draft article). The speedy deletion criterion it was deleted under ("CSD A7") regards whether the content actually seen in the article credibly indicates importance or significance, and has nothing to say on the whether the topic is or is not actually notable. What can be confusing is that they do interface, in that A7, like the other speedy deletion bases is a line in the sand as to the current content, is a device that often gets rid of content that has a probability of being not notable, if we looked for sources out in the world.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Balasuriya

The page that was speedy deleted is not fulfill the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. The deletion process seemed to be a personal attack by the proposer -Lkwikie (talk) 10:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done This was deleted via WP:A7 by RHaworth and as such you would have to ask him to restore the page and if he refuses, take it to deletion review. Offhand I do have to ask if you are the same editor as User:Textlover since this seems to be a word-for-word re-creation of the article Dinura and the article Dinura Pradeep Balasooriya. I also notice that there were several accounts editing Dinura Pradeep Balasooriya. (User:Samithaathula, User:Dinura Pradeep Balasooriya, User:Textlover, and yourself) Please understand that this gives off the impression that you are using multiple accounts in order to accomplish a purpose, which can be seen as WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. If you were asked to come on to Wikipedia to try to create the page after it was deleted, then this can be seen as WP:MEATPUPPETRY. Both are against Wikipedia policies and can lead to accounts getting blocked depending on the circumstances, especially if it looks like you were trying to create pages to promote someone or something, which offhand does appear to somewhat be the case here since it looks like there was a concentrated effort to create Dinura related pages on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:05, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I noticed that in one of the edits to the first article (Dinura Pradeep Balasooriya) someone mentioned that the sourced did not actually discuss the person that the article was about. I'll bring up one specific example: this book uses the name Balasuriya, but a look shows that it's actually about Tissa Balasuriya- a completely separate person. This was very, very easily detected and will discredit an editor and an article very quickly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Top Law Schools of India Rankings

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Hrithikashu (talk) 12:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WTA Tier I, PM, P5 Series records and statistics

I, Pindica, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pindica (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carpe Diem (Cultural Fest)

the page is for information on cultural festival of IIM Calcutta, one of the top management institutes in the world. it mentions all the events sponsors history and we are in the process to add more data to it. It will help people to undertand the event and ads to the knowledge by providing a structures information -Argost (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Randykitty (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Makeup Artist Association

There is no promotion or any advertisement of company in this article. It is a proper association that is registered with the Register of Society under the Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Singapore and then click the "Save page" button below -Reciffoodc (talk) 17:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Sphilbrick (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. We base content not on whether it exists, but on whether unrelated people have written about it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done This was a little too promotional for me to feel comfortable restoring it to the mainspace. It also read suspiciously like a copyright violation, as it came across like something that is typically used on an official website. Apart from that, there are some issues with notability as the organization exists (WP:ITEXISTS) but does not appear to be notable in and of itself. While I was looking for potential copyright violations I noticed that I didn't really see any coverage for the organization in reliable sources like newspapers and the like. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ron Burman

Requesting a final chance at reediting & resubmitting this page. Burman is an important figure in the world of A&R and the contemporary music business.Scottmcph1999 (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • On a side note, you will want to edit it for tone. Some of it is a little casually written and while it doesn't come off as overly promotional to where I'd decline on that basis, it would likely be an issue that would require a re-write in the future. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Martian War Saga (franchise)

in 2013 (as you didn't know), I was writing a new James Bond franchise before the deal with Disney comes to affect in this year -2.125.238.232 (talk) 00:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done and will not be done It was deleted as a hoax and as such is extremely unlikely to be restored without some good, solid proof that this actually exists. Also, it looks like this IP is User:Callump90 trying to evade his block, so I'm going to extend a warning that if you continue to try to re-introduce pages or further evade your block using IP addresses it is possible that your IP will eventually become permanently blocked as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pasteland/sandbox

I, Pasteland, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pasteland (talk) 02:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done I'm just a little uncomfortable restoring this since it reads suspiciously like it's taken from somewhere (ie, a copyright violation) and it's written in a manner that is so casual that it comes across as promotional at times. I'd prefer that this be re-written from scratch as at best it reads like a promotional WP:PEACOCK page for the guy. A good example of the promotional prose is the statement "Despite the stark, and deadpan severity of his work, laughter is to be taken in with all films, as he feels it is the most important part of the human condition." Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tieo Panther Bear

I, 76.14.113.81, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.14.113.81 (talk) 03:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia has many articles about Rap Artist, and has nothing about "Gangsta Leene" the rap artist. I felt it neccessary to include this artist, to let the world know about this well known, unknown rap artist, to those whom it may concern. -76.14.113.81 (talk) 03:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done I don't have a problem with you making a new draftspace entry, but the page was incredibly promotional in how it was written to the point where it would require a complete and total re-write to meet the NPOV standards. It's also written in a manner that comes across like it was taken from an official page, meaning that it kind of gives off the impression that it is likely to be a copyright violation. Also, please be aware that Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion like Bandcamp and is not intended to be used to "let the world know" about someone unless the person passes notability guidelines. I understand that this is an AfC submission, but it is still not intended to be used for publicity purposes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Franse

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -204.27.156.146 (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Errol Francis Sawyer

I, Fred Bakker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fred Bakker (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fred Bakker:  Not done, because there is no need: your sandbox article has been accepted, and is at Errol Francis Sawyer. Thank you for your contribution. JohnCD (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zarmina siraj ul haq

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Blackswan786 (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Hi, This page is not created for someone promotion. Zarmina siraj is an emerging online researcher in pakistana and a notable person here.so kindly undelet the info.sooner you ll be seeing many contributiong her works in this staeter article about her. so plz take this deletion back and get her on wikipedia again. thank you.[reply]

@Blackswan786: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Wikipedia does not cover "emerging" people, only those who have already arrived, see WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Miller (director, photographer)

I, Drlouie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drlouie (talk) 09:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Drlouie: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Michael Miller (director, photographer). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph DiGiovanni

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -204.27.156.146 (talk) 13:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC) He was a major crime figure in KC in the early 20th Century[reply]

 Not done. The deleted article was about a non-notable hand surgeon, and isn't eligible for restoration by request anyway, because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. Create it from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Rebshfx (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you're talking about Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lori Blondeau? I've restored it. Nyttend (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Later Sui Empire (dominating usurp during 1418-1644)

The article is new build version which I do develop and different form former similiar version of it. This version is not mangled, not vandal and not Hoax. Because, the article uses authentic text and legal books as listed at the article references section. The chinese used there can be read at online ctext.org which legally title of document. Why do the deletion? Please restore and undelete the page. -ADHZ07111989 (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done The problem that happened here, is that you replaced your article with a comment about the page, which caused the whole lot to be deleted. To talk about the validity of the topic, use the talk page at Talk:Later Sui Empire (dominating usurp during 1418-1644). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harivanga

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hasanur16 (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Morris Quinlan Experience

LeoTheDobermann (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Secunia

The article was deleted due to an expired prod. I feel that Secunia is notable, and that the number of employees it has shouldn't be used to gauge that. -Neøn (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no article for Secunia PSI (personal software inspector), notable free software (showing up in a search), if that's the Secunia you are talking about. It would be definitely notable (in the field of "computer security", "computer risk assessment", or similar), but maybe the PRODded article was in a hopeless state. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed a hopeless state. The entire text of the article was Secunia is an IT security company specialising in vulnerability management based in Copenhagen, Denmark. Niels Henrik Rasmussen, Thomas Kristensen, Michael H Zaman, Thomas Pill, and Jakob Balle founded Secunia in 2002, on a budget of $26,000. Their focus was the development of applications to address vulnerabilities in software and operating systems. No references provided, either. If you really want it to be undeleted, I will, but you'll need to rewrite everything anyway, so it wouldn't be any easier than creating a new article. Nyttend (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looking on the Wayback Machine, the article was relatively recently more substantial than when it was deleted, albeit lacking references. Granted the article will need an overhaul, I still think it would be easier to improve upon it. Why not add a section about Secunia PSI to the article, instead of creating a stub? If there's enough material it can be split off into its own article later. --Neøn (talk) 03:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Provenzano Crime Family

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -204.27.156.146 (talk) 18:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There is not, nor ever has been, an article by that name (uppercase or lowercase) in main article space, draft space, or AFC space. Please specify the correct title. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Clinicallytested/sandbox

My sandbox was deleted because, i suppose, i copy/pasted part of a user's edit. Am i supposed to ask the user to copy/paste his edit onto my sandbox? And by the way isn't it that all material published on wikipedia is free to copy? What am i missing? -Clinicallytested (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to copy elsewhere according to the terms of the Creative Commons license - which requires attribution to contributors. The existence of such a license does not however mean that Wikipedia is in any way obliged to host a repeatedly-deleted article in user space. It has been made abundantly clear that this material is entirely unacceptable for article content, and Wikipedia is not a webhosting service. If you wish to promote conspiracy theories, do so elsewhere. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Basically you want Targeted Individual back, but there were two AFDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual (2nd nomination) which decided to delete. There does not seem to be any prospect that this content would be come acceptable as an article. A related substantiated topic is Electronic harassment. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Seth Michelson

I, PVFanta, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PVFanta (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dao Leo ranaldo (rapper)

the page had a detailed load of facts which should have the notabilty to be on an Encyclopedia click the "Save page" button below -Itzcallum (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jackmcbarn (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done no claim of importance and no references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gus Sorola

Please userfy the most recent diff before deletion to Draft:Gus Sorola so I can work on adding second party sources. His company (Rooster Teeth) is releasing their first feature film this year which received a record $2.48 MILLION from crowdfunding. Thanks! -EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you will need to prove Sorola is notable independent of Rooster Teeth. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The deleted article is short enough that the relevant material (of which there is very little) could easily fit into Rooster Teeth. The deleted article shows no evidence of notability other than notability inherited from Rooster Teeth, and as we all know notability is not inherited. The three citations in the article point at Rooster Teeth podcasts and a YouTube video. Nothing independent.
Technical observation: I don't see any administrative tool to restore deleted revisions to another name. I wanted to do that while keeping the deletion log in its current place. I can restore the whole thing, then move it all to draft space, and the deletion log will move with it. And if I just copied and pasted the most recent deleted revision to draft, the editing history would be lost in the draft. I suppose if the draft were moved back over the main space title, the editing history would be merged. Suggestions? ~Amatulić (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Amatulic, you can't move logs. Delete Draft:Gus Sorola, and there will always be an entry in the deletion log for Draft:Gus Sorola, even if you undelete it, move it without redirect, split the history, etc. Nyttend (talk) 04:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Amatulic: I guess restore to Gus Sorola, G6 the draft, move it to the draft, then change Gus Sorola back to a redirect to Rooster Teeth until I can determine whether he has enough notability for the article. That would be great thanks! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ankur Ghai

I see that you placed the ankur ghai article for speedy deletion. All the sources are attached on the page.

He has been a part of two major tv series for two major channels here [Star Plus] and [Sony TV] and his name is mentioned on both wikipedia pages and other sources on google. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tum_Aise_Hi_Rehna https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nach_Baliye_6

Could you tell me what other information is needed for not letting this page go for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpavlankar (talk • contribs) 09:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The page has not been deleted yet, so the best place to contest this will be at the article page. However that said, being on the two shows is enough to warrant it passing speedy deletion criteria- although the editor that put it up for speedy could still take it to AfD. The best way to show notability for this would be to provide coverage in reliable sources like the Times of India. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TEJAS MAIYAD

Enter your Photography here and then click the "Save page" button below -Tejasmaiyad94 (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA)

the page contains important information on such an organization which represents the garment industry of Bangladeshis. I included the article in the Wikipedia since it is searched by many people globally because it deals with international stakeholders, including brands,buyers, development partners, scholars, researchers etc. Besides, the sources of information of this article are authentic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.234.212.164 (talk) 11:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ann Conolly

I, MerielGJones, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MerielGJones (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MerielGJones: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Before you do that, check out WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bhopal Ayurvedic Surgical Center

I, BASCAWC, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BASCAWC (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It was just one paragraph of unambiguously promotional text, with unsubstantiated puffery such as "one of the few", "one of the leading", "farsighted", "peoples like you", and so on. There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring an advertisement. Please start over. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joe Chenelly

I, 66.194.124.226, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This is a page I feel strongly about. It was an active page for years before it was deleted about seven months ago. I edited and thought it was being reviewed. I didn't know there was more edits needed. I got a message this morning that it was needing to be edited or would be deleted again. I came over as soon as I got the email but it was already gone. I will get the edits done ASAP if given the chance. 66.194.124.226 (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Avedro

I, K18s, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. k18s (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Please try again from scratch without attempting to promote the company. The draft was just one paragraph peppered with trademark names (complete with ™ and ® symbols everywhere, in contravention of Wikipedia's Manual of Style). As for establishing notability that will allow the article to be kept, please see Wikipedia:Golden rule for a brief overview of what is expected. Referencing press releases, narrow-interest trade publications, and the company's own website won't work to establish coverage. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valguard

The pages was deleted because it was seen as promotional and not notable, however the article followed all the criteria outlined by section G11 to NOT be deleted as it maintained a completely neutral point of view, in addition notability was shown in the section of the article outlining the recent robbery, which was reported by the news (which was linked to as a reference) Because of this I politely ask you to reconsider the deletion of this article. In addition if the position that this article is promotional is still maintained, may you please outline what needs to be changed to fix this? -Pinkfloydfan97 (talk) 17:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Notwithstanding that the article comes across as a corporate brochure regardless of how neutrally it was worded, it was also deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and therefore ineligible for restoration by request on this page. Take it up with the deleting administrator Bbb23, and if you are not satisfied with the admin's explanation, you may take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Grizzle

All content was original, though mistakenly labeled 'copyrighted' by bots or something. I'd appreciate the opportunity to review, fix anything necessary and resubmit. -2601:A:3B80:7C00:2844:9F13:1693:2942 (talk) 17:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, nothing to do. No article by that name (uppercase or lowercase) has ever existed on the Wikipedia, neither in main space, draft space, nor AFC space. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there's Draft:David Grizzle, but it hasn't been deleted. I have no idea if that draft is what the IP is referring to. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. I was looking only in the deleted article history, and nothing by that name (or variations) has ever been deleted. That draft does contain copyvio (see https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Draft:David_Grizzle&url=http://www.dazzlepartners.com for proof) but the problems are fixable. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Demian Gregory

I, 80.4.164.118, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 80.4.164.118 (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Demian Gregory. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Notability and WP:Notability (summary) - to establish notability requires independent references. IMDb is not considered reliable, because content is user-generated. JohnCD (talk) 23:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dizzyzane/Jeb 's Law

I, Dizzyzane, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dizzyzane (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dizzyzane: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It is quite hard to get an article about a neologism accepted - read WP:NEO. It's not enough that he announced it on Twitter: there needs to be evidence that it is in use, and has been discussed as well as used. JohnCD (talk) 23:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raju Thapa

I, Drunkhead, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drunkhead (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done It looks like this was a copyright violation from this website, among others. Please be aware that even if you have permission from Thapa, Wikipedia cannot take copyrighted material. You can file a ticket through WP:OTRS to give Wikipedia permission to use the material, however you would still have to re-write substantial parts of the article due to it being somewhat promotional in its tone. This is the catch of using material taken from other places. In most cases the material was written in order to promote the subject (in this case Mr. Thapa) and would be considered inappropriate for an encyclopedic entry, so it would still have to be re-written to meet the NPOV policies of Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ICBM (THE BAND)

Further data aquired -173.56.212.79 (talk) 02:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done I ran into a bit of trouble with this. The first is that the entry was fairly promotional/non-neutral in its writing style, enough to where it reads suspiciously like copyvio. At the very least it'd have to be pretty much re-written to meet the guidelines for NPOV. The second issue I ran into while looking to see if it was copyvio is that I can't find anything to actually substantiate that this band actually existed at all. Some of the claims in the article were a little outlandish, such as saying that a 14-year-old Allen Scott Plotkin discovered the band and "refined the sound". A look at his discography does not back up the claims that he worked with the band at all. Assuming that the band did exist, the lack of any sources mentioning the band does kind of make it seem like it is fairly non-notable. By all practical purposes the article itself said that the band never really did much beyond playing at a few local bars and clubs, at least not the type of performances that seemed to gain a ton of coverage. If you want to try to make a new entry at AfC then you can, but you will need to show where the band has received coverage in reliable sources like newspapers, academic sources, and the like. Word of mouth isn't considered to be a reliable source per Wikipedia and sadly, most small "never took off" bands will never gain this coverage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vertiver

I, Kishan04, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kishan04 (talk) 06:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kamran Zahid

I, Poetawan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kindly undelete the page so that I can make appropriate changes and make it published. and then click the "Save page" button below -Kamran Zahid 15:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetawan‎ (talk • contribs)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Joseph DiGiovanni (again)

He was a major KC Crime Boss -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.27.156.146 (talk) 16:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That's as may be, but the deleted article is about a hand surgeon, so it's of no use to you. Same answer as last time, in other words. BencherliteTalk 23:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, go ahead and create a new article from scratch if you like. Try the article wizard for help or ask a human at the help desk. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BHAVATARINI N

Enter your "she is an epitom of art and versetile lady. she having lots of achievement and i wanna express her talent. she is inspiration to other and a good social reformer from childhood" here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bittuworth (talk) 21:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Bittuworth, having a one-line article about a living person with no references is never going to be acceptable as an entry on Wikipedia. You need to read Wikipedia:Your first article and find out how to do it properly. BencherliteTalk 23:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Efthimiou

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -184.101.106.23 (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC) It's under my conclusion that the reason it was deleted is because he was not notable enough because he didn't play as many professional soccer games as his team mates yet he is one of 11 players to have won two championships in indoor soccer. Also I will add that notable people are usually well rounded an Mr Efthimiou was that and more by 1 He donates 100% of ALL of his profits from his art sales to 3 huge charities. 2 He was drafted and was ill his entire professional career yet played through his physical and mental pain 3 He was a published author 4 His college team was ranked #1 and always in the top 10 his entire college career 5 He was awarded the Scholar Athlete Award 6 He is the only player EVER TO HAVE SPONSored THE OFFICIAL PRACTICE GEAR of the very same team he played for. 7 He played a lot more games than the unofficial website states.[reply]

Just because there is no other source one can't pick one and expect it to be correct when in a huge contradiction all his team mates were judged by the same source. So its good enough a source for great facts but not for others?

THE VERY TEAM THAT HE WAS A MEMBER OF AND ALSO WON THE CHAMPIONSHIP THE SAME YEAR All these accomplishments and more were edited out and then the article looked like a skeleton of it's former self only to be sliced and diced without any defendants with a fair mind.

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.101.106.23 (talk • contribs)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Efthimiou, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. BencherliteTalk 23:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ICBM (THE BAND) #2

I, Amecincco, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Amecincco (talk) 23:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You received a response to your previous request here. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Grass it up

I, Wymiller, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wymiller (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wymiller: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. I am willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it. Please advise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Web Health Solution

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -59.152.96.250 (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: what is the exact title of the page you mean? I have tried Web Health Solution and Web Health Solutions, and variations of capitalisation, and tried the Draft and AfC spaces, without result. If you do not know the exact name, do you know the username of the account that created it? JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UBA-Universal Basketball Alliance

I want to share the information about Universal basketball Alliance and its not what I'm doing wrong I'm not getting. the rules and regulations I have read, but still not getting why my page got deleted. I really need help please please help me -331dot (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iederpino (talk • contribs) 12:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles are just promotional pieces for your company which is not permitted. Further, if you are associated with it, you should not be creating pages about it per the conflict of interest policy. 331dot (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done and will not be done. Article was properly deleted as an advertisement (" we can bring ideas to life... We know the unbridled passion... We serve as experts... " etc.) Requester has been blocked as a sockpuppet. JohnCD (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sharmini Jayawardena

I, Xander.Jay, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Xander.Jay (talk) 12:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Xander.Jay: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Blake (musician)

I, Paulgblake, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paulgblake (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" You will need citations on this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blackhillsstate1

I was unaware that my content was posted for review. I was still developing and revising the content. Now that it has been deleted, I"m unable to continue working on it. Can my content be reinstated so I can work on it? Thank you for your time. -20:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Blackhillsstate1 (talk)

Done and draft moved to Draft:Tom Jackson, Jr. -- GB fan 21:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ira Lujan

Citations were included at the end of the article. " button below -Sanibelart (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Writer will happily edit the article to meet Wikipedia standards requirements. Lujan is an important Native American Artist and deserves to be searchable by people who want to know more about him.[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Just Chilling (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. A7s likewise will not be restored here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ira lujan

Please transfer the article to draft status so I may have time to research additional sources and edit with changes that meet Wikipedia standards, without having to recreate the entire article. Thank you. -Sanibelart (talk) 22:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Sanibelart (talk) 22:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Article is now at Draft:Ira Lujan. Please use the Article for Creation process by hitting the "submit for review" button on the draft page when you feel it is ready (i.e. after sources have been added). --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lena Boone

Please move this article to draft status so I may have time to do additional research, edit the article per Wikipedia standards and present a proper case for the noteworthiness of this person. Thank you -Sanibelart (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Sanibelart (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nitesh estates limited

The company is notable so must present on wikipedia. Let's put a non-promotional content and create this page. -Rowmanwhite (talk) 11:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nitesh estates

WP:N -Rowmanwhite (talk) 12:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Give it a rest, Ramesh: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramesh985 Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
request I want to create this page wih a modified and non-promotional content. Please allow me to do that and if in case the content seems to be promotional then please do modify it. User talk: Rowmanwhite (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TSPĮ

I, Booraz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Booraz (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=644845756"