Template:Did you know nominations/Violet (opera): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
to prep 4 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
{{DYKsubpage |
|||
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
|||
|monthyear=January 2015 |
|||
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no--> |
|||
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 05:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
|||
|2= |
|||
{{DYK conditions}} |
{{DYK conditions}} |
||
====Violet (opera)==== |
====Violet (opera)==== |
||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Violet (opera)|Violet (opera)}} |
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Violet (opera)|Violet (opera)}} |
||
<!-- |
|||
Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion. |
|||
--> |
|||
* <s>... that in [[Roger Scruton]]'s '''[[Violet (opera)|musical take]]''' on the eccentric menage of [[Violet Gordon-Woodhouse]], [[Ethel Smyth]] is a [[baritone]]? </s> |
* <s>... that in [[Roger Scruton]]'s '''[[Violet (opera)|musical take]]''' on the eccentric menage of [[Violet Gordon-Woodhouse]], [[Ethel Smyth]] is a [[baritone]]? </s> |
||
<!-- |
|||
--> |
|||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cola nitida|Cola nitida]] |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cola nitida|Cola nitida]] |
||
<small>Created by [[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]). Self nominated at 16:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)</small>. |
<small>Created by [[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]). Self nominated at 16:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)</small>. |
||
<!-- |
|||
* {{DYKmake|Violet (opera)|Smerus}} |
|||
--> |
|||
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting plot! Good sources, some accepted AGF. "Menage" is not an everyday word, and not in the article. (That may be just me.) "Musical take" is a bit harmless, and doesn't prepare for anything vocal. Ideas? How about "a leading woman" (or a better term) instead of giving her name away? (Every other link in the hook takes away from the article clicks, - wisdom from Andy Mabbett) Perhaps: "... a baritone sings the part of a leading lady" (a woman composer ...), --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 10:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting plot! Good sources, some accepted AGF. "Menage" is not an everyday word, and not in the article. (That may be just me.) "Musical take" is a bit harmless, and doesn't prepare for anything vocal. Ideas? How about "a leading woman" (or a better term) instead of giving her name away? (Every other link in the hook takes away from the article clicks, - wisdom from Andy Mabbett) Perhaps: "... a baritone sings the part of a leading lady" (a woman composer ...), --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 10:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
Line 28: | Line 18: | ||
: [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Happy. Be prepared to defend "vision", because that is also not a term used in the article. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 11:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
: [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Happy. Be prepared to defend "vision", because that is also not a term used in the article. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 11:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
:: *"Vision"="[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vision a creation of fancy]". (Wiktionary).--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 12:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
:: *"Vision"="[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vision a creation of fancy]". (Wiktionary).--[[User:Smerus|Smerus]] ([[User talk:Smerus|talk]]) 12:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 05:37, 31 January 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 05:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Violet (opera)
... that in Roger Scruton's musical take on the eccentric menage of Violet Gordon-Woodhouse, Ethel Smyth is a baritone?
- Reviewed: Cola nitida
Created by Smerus (talk). Self nominated at 16:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC).
- Interesting plot! Good sources, some accepted AGF. "Menage" is not an everyday word, and not in the article. (That may be just me.) "Musical take" is a bit harmless, and doesn't prepare for anything vocal. Ideas? How about "a leading woman" (or a better term) instead of giving her name away? (Every other link in the hook takes away from the article clicks, - wisdom from Andy Mabbett) Perhaps: "... a baritone sings the part of a leading lady" (a woman composer ...), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt:OK I would be happy with - would you prefer? -
Alt 1: ... that in Roger Scruton's musical vision of the eccentric love-life of Violet Gordon-Woodhouse, a leading lady is sung by a baritone?
--Smerus (talk) 11:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Happy. Be prepared to defend "vision", because that is also not a term used in the article. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- *"Vision"="a creation of fancy". (Wiktionary).--Smerus (talk) 12:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)