Talk:Köhler illumination: Difference between revisions
physica |
Assessment: Physics: class=Start, importance=Low (assisted) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Microbiology|class=start|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Microbiology |class=start |importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology|importance=low|class=start}} |
{{WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology |importance=low |class=start}} |
||
{{WikiProject Physics}} |
{{WikiProject Physics |class=Start |importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
==Creation== |
==Creation== |
Revision as of 02:52, 3 February 2015
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Template:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Creation
I created this article...I plan to add more referances and elaborate on the technique...if anybody has input I would love to hear it & I hope people add their own edits Coolbrdr 09:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Suggestions
Thanks. A diagram would be great to explain/show. Rod57 15:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Telecentric ?
I have seen some suggestions that microscope objectives and condensers are generally telecentric. Can anyone here confirm or deny that? Please update that talk page or article. Thanks. --195.137.93.171 (talk) 07:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
For an optical system to be telecentric, the chief-rays of all ray-bundles must be parallel to the optic axis. That is clearly not so in microscope optics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.20.8.1 (talk) 02:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Nuclearnova
I'm doing a project on this in class now, a diagram would be great for future students if anyone has one or could make one! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeleveto (talk • contribs) 15:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Advantages
'By adjustment of the field diaphragm the amount of light entering the sample can be freely adjusted without altering the wavelengths of light present, in contrast to reducing power to the light source with critical illumination.' - These two techniques are not comparable. Reducing the field diaphragm reduces the field of illumination but does nothing to change the intensity of the illumination. In Koehler illumination the intensity of the illumination may be changed either by changing the power to the light source (thus changing the temperature of the light generated by the source) or by inserting neutral density filter into the light path, usually in the collimated beam between the collector lens and the field diaphragm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.102.115.129 (talk) 01:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)