Talk:2015 Persib Bandung season: Difference between revisions
→Edits that are not in line with MoS: new section |
MbahGondrong (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
A month ago I edited this page, adding quite much sections that are not in line with [[WP:MoS]]. I was fully aware of this but I think it was fine to add some useful information to this page, like in other club season's Wikipedia page (i.e. [[2014-15 Chelsea F.C. season]] and [[2014-15 Liverpool F.C. season]]). But then one of you reverted it to the old and boring, but in line with MoS style. Although stated on the MoS page: "Its goal is to make using Wikipedia easier and more intuitive by promoting clarity and cohesion while helping editors write articles with consistent and precise language, layout, and formatting", please keep in mind that it also said: "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason", and in my opinion, my edit was fine. I hope the following edit is fine and be kept on the page. Thanks! [[User:Imanureko|Imanureko]] ([[User talk:Imanureko|talk]]) 07:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
A month ago I edited this page, adding quite much sections that are not in line with [[WP:MoS]]. I was fully aware of this but I think it was fine to add some useful information to this page, like in other club season's Wikipedia page (i.e. [[2014-15 Chelsea F.C. season]] and [[2014-15 Liverpool F.C. season]]). But then one of you reverted it to the old and boring, but in line with MoS style. Although stated on the MoS page: "Its goal is to make using Wikipedia easier and more intuitive by promoting clarity and cohesion while helping editors write articles with consistent and precise language, layout, and formatting", please keep in mind that it also said: "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason", and in my opinion, my edit was fine. I hope the following edit is fine and be kept on the page. Thanks! [[User:Imanureko|Imanureko]] ([[User talk:Imanureko|talk]]) 07:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
* Hi, the main thing is it should follow the general [[WP:MOS]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Club seasons|MOS for Club Seasons]], boring or not boring. [[User:MbahGondrong|MbahGondrong]] ([[User talk:MbahGondrong|talk]]) 21:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:08, 3 February 2015
Indonesia Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Football Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Edits that are not in line with MoS
Hi
A month ago I edited this page, adding quite much sections that are not in line with WP:MoS. I was fully aware of this but I think it was fine to add some useful information to this page, like in other club season's Wikipedia page (i.e. 2014-15 Chelsea F.C. season and 2014-15 Liverpool F.C. season). But then one of you reverted it to the old and boring, but in line with MoS style. Although stated on the MoS page: "Its goal is to make using Wikipedia easier and more intuitive by promoting clarity and cohesion while helping editors write articles with consistent and precise language, layout, and formatting", please keep in mind that it also said: "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason", and in my opinion, my edit was fine. I hope the following edit is fine and be kept on the page. Thanks! Imanureko (talk) 07:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, the main thing is it should follow the general WP:MOS and MOS for Club Seasons, boring or not boring. MbahGondrong (talk) 21:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)