Jump to content

Talk:2015 Persib Bandung season: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:


A month ago I edited this page, adding quite much sections that are not in line with [[WP:MoS]]. I was fully aware of this but I think it was fine to add some useful information to this page, like in other club season's Wikipedia page (i.e. [[2014-15 Chelsea F.C. season]] and [[2014-15 Liverpool F.C. season]]). But then one of you reverted it to the old and boring, but in line with MoS style. Although stated on the MoS page: "Its goal is to make using Wikipedia easier and more intuitive by promoting clarity and cohesion while helping editors write articles with consistent and precise language, layout, and formatting", please keep in mind that it also said: "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason", and in my opinion, my edit was fine. I hope the following edit is fine and be kept on the page. Thanks! [[User:Imanureko|Imanureko]] ([[User talk:Imanureko|talk]]) 07:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
A month ago I edited this page, adding quite much sections that are not in line with [[WP:MoS]]. I was fully aware of this but I think it was fine to add some useful information to this page, like in other club season's Wikipedia page (i.e. [[2014-15 Chelsea F.C. season]] and [[2014-15 Liverpool F.C. season]]). But then one of you reverted it to the old and boring, but in line with MoS style. Although stated on the MoS page: "Its goal is to make using Wikipedia easier and more intuitive by promoting clarity and cohesion while helping editors write articles with consistent and precise language, layout, and formatting", please keep in mind that it also said: "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason", and in my opinion, my edit was fine. I hope the following edit is fine and be kept on the page. Thanks! [[User:Imanureko|Imanureko]] ([[User talk:Imanureko|talk]]) 07:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
* Hi, the main thing is it should follow the general [[WP:MOS]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Club seasons|MOS for Club Seasons]], boring or not boring. [[User:MbahGondrong|MbahGondrong]] ([[User talk:MbahGondrong|talk]]) 21:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:08, 3 February 2015

WikiProject iconIndonesia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFootball Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edits that are not in line with MoS

Hi

A month ago I edited this page, adding quite much sections that are not in line with WP:MoS. I was fully aware of this but I think it was fine to add some useful information to this page, like in other club season's Wikipedia page (i.e. 2014-15 Chelsea F.C. season and 2014-15 Liverpool F.C. season). But then one of you reverted it to the old and boring, but in line with MoS style. Although stated on the MoS page: "Its goal is to make using Wikipedia easier and more intuitive by promoting clarity and cohesion while helping editors write articles with consistent and precise language, layout, and formatting", please keep in mind that it also said: "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason", and in my opinion, my edit was fine. I hope the following edit is fine and be kept on the page. Thanks! Imanureko (talk) 07:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]