User talk:Georgia Bird

September 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to T.I.. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. See this [1] [2] [3] Roh^G ??· 04:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello

What's up with certain individuals trying to make everybody "multiracial"? People like LL Cool J, Monica, Beyonce, and the rest identify as black/African American. Why are they vandalizing these articles with their nonsensical agenda? B-Machine (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

It's like they think there's something wrong with being black. The overwhelming majority of black people in the U.S. have no trace of Indian heritage at all. A few do, but most don't. All of that lightness is from white European men having their way with black African women. It could be a romanticization of our past, which is wrong because it attempts to rewrite our history since some Indian tribes had black slaves and treated them like shit, but I think it's mostly self-hatred. They must think anything black or African is ugly or evil while anything not black or African is cute or good. And why do they think indigenous Africans are all jet black with flat broad noses and kinky afros? Some are like that, but others are brown-skinned with medium-sized noses and curly hair. They're not "multiracial," it's just that Africans have the most diverse DNA on the planet, which proves the black man is the original man and the black woman is the original woman. Also, they seem to think a light-skinned black man or woman is not black even if that person identifies as black. What? If you notice, this mostly exists among some ignorant and confused black Americans. It's all self-hating, "I-want-to-be-anything-but-black" nonsense. B-Machine (talk) 15:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In T.I., you recently added a link to the disambiguation page The View (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited T.I. discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Part II (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

It Seems like wikipedia are mad with T.I., hey look is not because I Say it, if you ask T.I. you will now if his discography its right. Look T.I. said in many interviews how many of his singles have been certified gold and platinum by RIAA. 27 December 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.14 (talk) 03:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Say what now? Georgia Peachez (talk) 16:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

T.I. notification

Hey man I understand, If you dont like T.I., ok, of course wikipedia is angry with T.i. since get back up (song). you always talk about neutral point of view, you are hiding record sales information and using old sources on T.I. DISCOGRAPHY, most of the rappers wikipages have new sources of information in their discographies until 2013, but t.i. doesnt has it, look what u did to no matter what, you know the fact it has been platinum, of course is part of your campaign against t.i.. so if gonna change or hide t.i. information, ¿ why wikipedia made a page of t.i.? yeah and later u will show me old sources. t.i. said in many interviews that he has multi-platinum albums, trap muzik and king in july 2010 were 2x platinum, paper trail has been 3x platinum as july 2012. no mercy sold over one million in the US as december 2012. , but you have to think in the Fans. t.i. is not an artist, is a movement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.12 (talk) 20:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

T.I. discography certifications

Hey. I noticed that you changed the certifications listed for "Blurred Lines" at T.I. discography – per WP:DISCOGSTYLE, you should not add certifications into discography tables that do not correspond for the countries within them, hence why I removed the Belgian and Italian certifications (as those countries' charts are not used) and put in the Swiss one (as that country is used). I just thought I should justify myself before mindlessly reverting, and to avoid a dispute. Have a nice day! I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 18:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm not disputing that it was actually certified in Belgium and Italy, as the references you use are reliable. The point is that unless the country that the certification is from is also included as one of the charts used in the table (i.e. represented by the headings US, AUS, GER, UK, etc.), you shouldn't list said certification (i.e. if Belgium and Italy were used as charts in the table, then you could keep those certifications. But they're not. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 18:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

The reference which I actually used shows that it was indeed certified in Switzerland. Just because this certification hasn't been added to the article for the song yet (which I'll do right now) doesn't mean that it's false, as curiously these are the only ones you have so far accepted as true (hey, it's been certified in Denmark as well). And yes, I could have just removed them manually, but I was just too lazy. Sorry. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 18:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Template: T.I. singles, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. STATic message me! 18:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

"Cut the crap", "Back off", "go away". You are so funny. Please see Help:Minor edit, when you are edit warring it is not a minor edit. "A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." When two editors have changed it, it is time to stop showing ownership and see the talk page of the template for discussion.STATic message me! 18:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lupita Nyong'o, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)