Jump to content

User talk:Majora4: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; font-size:11pt">'''If I leave you a message on your talk page, please reply there.'''</div>
<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; font-size:11pt">'''If I leave you a message on your talk page, please reply there.'''</div>
I'm sorry I messed about

Matt from the UK
==[[Eesaia Jude Filbrun]]==
==[[Eesaia Jude Filbrun]]==
I could find the book - it's self-published with lulu. That doesn't make it notable, but it shows it does exist... [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 22:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
I could find the book - it's self-published with lulu. That doesn't make it notable, but it shows it does exist... [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 22:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:47, 18 February 2015

If I leave you a message on your talk page, please reply there.

I'm sorry I messed about Matt from the UK

I could find the book - it's self-published with lulu. That doesn't make it notable, but it shows it does exist... Peridon (talk) 22:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback?

I see you've been doing a lot of anti-vandalism work. Thanks a lot! Would you like me to enable rollback on your account to make vandalism reversion easier? Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would, thank you. I appreciate being trusted with the privilege. – Majora4 (leave a message) 22:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Pokémon

Thank you for your help giving the empty, split sections summaries. I did the first half of 1-50, but never found time for more. I hope you continue. Blake (Talk·Edits) 14:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry. I didn't catch the synonym. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. It's possible that they're distinct. I can't find info on synonyms. Perhaps the genus is called Purple Emperor. I've asked at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lepidoptera#Possible duplicate article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Two different species. Sorry if I freaked you out.

By the way, good job on the article. And, it's always a good idea to make redirects for the synonyms. Best wishes,  :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. You did a great job. This was the first article I've created, so I wasn't certain about all the procedures and such. Thanks a bunch. – Majora4 (leave a message) 21:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The racist edit

A level 3 warning would be justified, I think. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion. I had wondered if a higher level warning might have been appropriate, but I figured the warnings could always escalate if the user continued to vandalize Wikipedia. – Majora4 (leave a message) 22:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, my friend. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hamsa

Hamsa

My removing the text where fatima's hand is associated to islam was not a mistake, the text was a mistake. Fatima's hand is purely cultural and is actually considered shirk in islam (a major sin). It is not believed to bring good luck on Islam, to the contrary believing in things such as amulets bringing luck is a major sin.

If you have other questions about shirk or the symbolism of fatima's hand in Islam please read the contents of these links

http://islamqa.info/en/126359 http://islamqa.info/en/34817 I hope you will understand why I have deleted the content from the article and not restore the inaccurate ( and offensive) content

Proposed deletion of Ariel 3 (disambiguation)

I accept your argument and I would not object to a deletion. Arrivisto (talk) 09:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lambert's Cafe

Ok, so that's 5 for me, and 3 for you, but I think ClueBot NG is still in the lead. :P Deunanknute (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my friend. Would you permit me to revert this edit? I have found that leaving a few blue links really helps to show that articles are being actively created. This helps encourage others to create articles. Best wishes. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, of course, revert away. I'd love to see more users helping out with the project. Sometimes it feels like I'm the only one. (I know it's not though). Cheers – Majora4 (leave a message) 23:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've done it. Many, many thanks, and keep up the good work! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

lobachevsky formula redirect

Hi, I think we were in an editing conflict on Angle of parallelism (I first made the new redirect for Lobachevsky's formula to Angle of parallelism and then found that i had to rewrite Angle of parallelism. ((one of them rewriting the section you changed the redirect to). Can you check if all works correct (I am just a beginning editor) WillemienH (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]